You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> on 2021/08/20 04:49:01 UTC

[VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.32.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)


Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release
candidate, and vote +1 if
no issues are found.

The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
* the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org [2],
which is signed with the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3],
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
* source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
* website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
* Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and OpenJDK/Oracle JDK
1.8.0_181.
* Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
dist.apache.org [2].
* Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with validation
[9].
* Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.

For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out our
blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.

Thanks,
Release Manager

[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
[2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
[3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
[4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
[5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
[6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
[7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
[8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
[9]
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
[10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com>.

Thanks for validations!
Just a reminder that voting and validations will be open 24th Aug 11:59
PM PST
Please feel free to validate and vote.

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:48 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev <va...@google.com>
wrote:

> +1, ran several Python batch and streaming pipelines from quickstarts and
> examples without issues and checked Dataflow containers for dependency
> compatibility.
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:41 PM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding). The artifacts and signatures look good to me.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:24 PM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Cham
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the validations.
>> >>
>> >> As for the errors. Externally built containers were not pulled
>> internally. The error should be fixed now.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM Chamikara Jayalath <
>> chamikara@google.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Are Dataflow containers not available yet ?
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm getting following when running some verifications.
>> >>>
>> >>> [failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with ImagePullBackOff:
>> "Back-off pulling image \"
>> gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>"",
>> failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off
>> pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>""
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pa...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> +1
>> >>>> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing
>> Dataflow templates.
>> >>>> Best
>> >>>> -P.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct
>> runners. Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but
>> I wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Ahmet
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <
>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues
>> were introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any
>> regressions.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 and
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 - These are flakiness
>> issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do not think
>> it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a RC2, we can
>> choose to cherry pick https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 - This was
>> introduced after release-2.32.0 in
>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165. We can ignore this for 2.32.0
>> release.
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 - this is
>> another flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after
>> release-2.32.0 (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859). This
>> is probably also not worth fixing for 2.32.0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <
>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this
>> release?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am
>> I missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
>> version 2.32.0, as follows:
>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>> comments)
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the
>> release candidate, and vote +1 if
>> >>>>>>>> no issues are found.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> includes:
>> >>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> >>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>> A6699985948 [3],
>> >>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>> [4],
>> >>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>> >>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the
>> API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>> >>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and
>> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
>> >>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to
>> the dist.apache.org [2].
>> >>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with
>> validation [9].
>> >>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check
>> out our blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>> Release Manager
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
>> >>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
>> >>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> >>>>>>>> [4]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
>> >>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
>> >>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
>> >>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
>> >>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
>> >>>>>>>> [9]
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
>> >>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com>.

Thanks for letting me know.
Yes, it is a false duplicate. I will get it removed.

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 6:23 AM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ankur, could you take a look on this branch?
> https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/release-2.32
>
> Is it a "false duplicate" of
> https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/release-2.32.0 or something else?
>
> —
> Alexey
>
> On 25 Aug 2021, at 20:10, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
>
> Update:
> We have 8 votes in favor of release and 3 of them are binding.
> I will wait till 25 Aug 6 PM PST to start finalizing the release.
>
> Thanks for helping with the validations.
>
> Thanks,
> Ankur
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 9:49 AM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Tested a few more configurations.
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 3:20 PM Alexey Romanenko <
>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> Tested by beam-samples and Spark Runner
>>>
>>> On 24 Aug 2021, at 10:14, Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Validated my downstream dependencies build fine against the RC.
>>> On 8/23/21 11:48 PM, Valentyn Tymofieiev wrote:
>>>
>>> +1, ran several Python batch and streaming pipelines from quickstarts
>>> and examples without issues and checked Dataflow containers for dependency
>>> compatibility.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:41 PM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding). The artifacts and signatures look good to me.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:24 PM Chamikara Jayalath <
>>>> chamikara@google.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > +1 (binding)
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Cham
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thanks for the validations.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> As for the errors. Externally built containers were not pulled
>>>> internally. The error should be fixed now.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM Chamikara Jayalath <
>>>> chamikara@google.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Are Dataflow containers not available yet ?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I'm getting following when running some verifications.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> [failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with ImagePullBackOff:
>>>> "Back-off pulling image \"
>>>> gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>>>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>"",
>>>> failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off
>>>> pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>>>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>""
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pa...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> +1
>>>> >>>> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing
>>>> Dataflow templates.
>>>> >>>> Best
>>>> >>>> -P.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct
>>>> runners. Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues,
>>>> but I wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Ahmet
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <
>>>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues
>>>> were introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any
>>>> regressions.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 and
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 - These are flakiness
>>>> issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do not think
>>>> it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a RC2, we can
>>>> choose to cherry pick https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 - This was
>>>> introduced after release-2.32.0 in
>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165. We can ignore this for
>>>> 2.32.0 release.
>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 - this is
>>>> another flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after
>>>> release-2.32.0 (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859). This
>>>> is probably also not worth fixing for 2.32.0
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <
>>>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this
>>>> release?
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1].
>>>> Am I missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> [1]
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> >>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
>>>> version 2.32.0, as follows:
>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>> comments)
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the
>>>> release candidate, and vote +1 if
>>>> >>>>>>>> no issues are found.
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>> includes:
>>>> >>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>> >>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>>>> A6699985948 [3],
>>>> >>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>>>> [4],
>>>> >>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>>>> >>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the
>>>> API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>> >>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and
>>>> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
>>>> >>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release
>>>> to the dist.apache.org [2].
>>>> >>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with
>>>> validation [9].
>>>> >>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects,
>>>> check out our blog post at
>>>> https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>> >>>>>>>> Release Manager
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> [1]
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
>>>> >>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
>>>> >>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>> >>>>>>>> [4]
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
>>>> >>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
>>>> >>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
>>>> >>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
>>>> >>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
>>>> >>>>>>>> [9]
>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
>>>> >>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>.

Ankur, could you take a look on this branch?
https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/release-2.32 <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/release-2.32> 

Is it a "false duplicate" of https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/release-2.32.0 <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/release-2.32.0> or something else?

—
Alexey

> On 25 Aug 2021, at 20:10, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Update:
> We have 8 votes in favor of release and 3 of them are binding.
> I will wait till 25 Aug 6 PM PST to start finalizing the release.
> 
> Thanks for helping with the validations.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ankur
> 
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 9:49 AM Kenneth Knowles <kenn@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> 
> Tested a few more configurations.
> 
> Kenn
> 
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 3:20 PM Alexey Romanenko <aromanenko.dev@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> +1 
> Tested by beam-samples and Spark Runner
> 
>> On 24 Aug 2021, at 10:14, Jan Lukavský <je.ik@seznam.cz <ma...@seznam.cz>> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> 
>> Validated my downstream dependencies build fine against the RC.
>> 
>> On 8/23/21 11:48 PM, Valentyn Tymofieiev wrote:
>>> +1, ran several Python batch and streaming pipelines from quickstarts and examples without issues and checked Dataflow containers for dependency compatibility.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:41 PM Robert Bradshaw <robertwb@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> +1 (binding). The artifacts and signatures look good to me.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:24 PM Chamikara Jayalath <chamikara@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1 (binding)
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Cham
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ankur Goenka <goenka@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks for the validations.
>>> >>
>>> >> As for the errors. Externally built containers were not pulled internally. The error should be fixed now.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM Chamikara Jayalath <chamikara@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Are Dataflow containers not available yet ?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I'm getting following when running some verifications.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\ <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>"", failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\ <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>""
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pabloem@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> +1
>>> >>>> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing Dataflow templates.
>>> >>>> Best
>>> >>>> -P.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct runners. Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but I wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Ahmet
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <aromanenko.dev@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues were introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any regressions.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683> and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733> - These are flakiness issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do not think it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a RC2, we can choose to cherry pick https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330>
>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764> - This was introduced after release-2.32.0 in https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165>. We can ignore this for 2.32.0 release.
>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766> - this is another flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after release-2.32.0 (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859>). This is probably also not worth fixing for 2.32.0
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <aromanenko.dev@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release?
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am I missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <goenka@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>> >>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.32.0, as follows:
>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release candidate, and vote +1 if
>>> >>>>>>>> no issues are found.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>> >>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> >>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3],
>>> >>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>> >>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>>> >>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>> >>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
>>> >>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2].
>>> >>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with validation [9].
>>> >>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out our blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/ <https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/>.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>> >>>>>>>> Release Manager
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992>
>>> >>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/>
>>> >>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>>> >>>>>>>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/>
>>> >>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1 <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1>
>>> >>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317>
>>> >>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618 <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618>
>>> >>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324>
>>> >>>>>>>> [9] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107>
>>> >>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image <https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com>.

Update:
We have 8 votes in favor of release and 3 of them are binding.
I will wait till 25 Aug 6 PM PST to start finalizing the release.

Thanks for helping with the validations.

Thanks,
Ankur

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 9:49 AM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Tested a few more configurations.
>
> Kenn
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 3:20 PM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> Tested by beam-samples and Spark Runner
>>
>> On 24 Aug 2021, at 10:14, Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Validated my downstream dependencies build fine against the RC.
>> On 8/23/21 11:48 PM, Valentyn Tymofieiev wrote:
>>
>> +1, ran several Python batch and streaming pipelines from quickstarts and
>> examples without issues and checked Dataflow containers for dependency
>> compatibility.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:41 PM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding). The artifacts and signatures look good to me.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:24 PM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1 (binding)
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Cham
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks for the validations.
>>> >>
>>> >> As for the errors. Externally built containers were not pulled
>>> internally. The error should be fixed now.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM Chamikara Jayalath <
>>> chamikara@google.com> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Are Dataflow containers not available yet ?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I'm getting following when running some verifications.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with ImagePullBackOff:
>>> "Back-off pulling image \"
>>> gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>"",
>>> failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off
>>> pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>""
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pa...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> +1
>>> >>>> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing
>>> Dataflow templates.
>>> >>>> Best
>>> >>>> -P.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct
>>> runners. Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but
>>> I wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Ahmet
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <
>>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues
>>> were introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any
>>> regressions.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 and
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 - These are flakiness
>>> issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do not think
>>> it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a RC2, we can
>>> choose to cherry pick https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 - This was
>>> introduced after release-2.32.0 in
>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165. We can ignore this for
>>> 2.32.0 release.
>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 - this is
>>> another flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after
>>> release-2.32.0 (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859). This
>>> is probably also not worth fixing for 2.32.0
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <
>>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this
>>> release?
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1].
>>> Am I missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> [1]
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>> >>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
>>> version 2.32.0, as follows:
>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>> comments)
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the
>>> release candidate, and vote +1 if
>>> >>>>>>>> no issues are found.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>> includes:
>>> >>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> >>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>>> A6699985948 [3],
>>> >>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>>> [4],
>>> >>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>>> >>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the
>>> API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>> >>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and
>>> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
>>> >>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release
>>> to the dist.apache.org [2].
>>> >>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with
>>> validation [9].
>>> >>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects,
>>> check out our blog post at
>>> https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>> >>>>>>>> Release Manager
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> [1]
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
>>> >>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
>>> >>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>> >>>>>>>> [4]
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
>>> >>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
>>> >>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
>>> >>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
>>> >>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
>>> >>>>>>>> [9]
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
>>> >>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org>.

+1 (binding)

Tested a few more configurations.

Kenn

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 3:20 PM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
> Tested by beam-samples and Spark Runner
>
> On 24 Aug 2021, at 10:14, Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Validated my downstream dependencies build fine against the RC.
> On 8/23/21 11:48 PM, Valentyn Tymofieiev wrote:
>
> +1, ran several Python batch and streaming pipelines from quickstarts and
> examples without issues and checked Dataflow containers for dependency
> compatibility.
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:41 PM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding). The artifacts and signatures look good to me.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:24 PM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Cham
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the validations.
>> >>
>> >> As for the errors. Externally built containers were not pulled
>> internally. The error should be fixed now.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM Chamikara Jayalath <
>> chamikara@google.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Are Dataflow containers not available yet ?
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm getting following when running some verifications.
>> >>>
>> >>> [failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with ImagePullBackOff:
>> "Back-off pulling image \"
>> gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>"",
>> failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off
>> pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>""
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pa...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> +1
>> >>>> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing
>> Dataflow templates.
>> >>>> Best
>> >>>> -P.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct
>> runners. Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but
>> I wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Ahmet
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <
>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues
>> were introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any
>> regressions.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 and
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 - These are flakiness
>> issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do not think
>> it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a RC2, we can
>> choose to cherry pick https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 - This was
>> introduced after release-2.32.0 in
>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165. We can ignore this for 2.32.0
>> release.
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 - this is
>> another flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after
>> release-2.32.0 (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859). This
>> is probably also not worth fixing for 2.32.0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <
>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this
>> release?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am
>> I missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
>> version 2.32.0, as follows:
>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>> comments)
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the
>> release candidate, and vote +1 if
>> >>>>>>>> no issues are found.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> includes:
>> >>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> >>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>> A6699985948 [3],
>> >>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>> [4],
>> >>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>> >>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the
>> API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>> >>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and
>> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
>> >>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to
>> the dist.apache.org [2].
>> >>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with
>> validation [9].
>> >>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check
>> out our blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>> Release Manager
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
>> >>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
>> >>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> >>>>>>>> [4]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
>> >>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
>> >>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
>> >>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
>> >>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
>> >>>>>>>> [9]
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
>> >>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>.

+1 
Tested by beam-samples and Spark Runner

> On 24 Aug 2021, at 10:14, Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> wrote:
> 
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> Validated my downstream dependencies build fine against the RC.
> 
> On 8/23/21 11:48 PM, Valentyn Tymofieiev wrote:
>> +1, ran several Python batch and streaming pipelines from quickstarts and examples without issues and checked Dataflow containers for dependency compatibility.
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:41 PM Robert Bradshaw <robertwb@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> +1 (binding). The artifacts and signatures look good to me.
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:24 PM Chamikara Jayalath <chamikara@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Cham
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ankur Goenka <goenka@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the validations.
>> >>
>> >> As for the errors. Externally built containers were not pulled internally. The error should be fixed now.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM Chamikara Jayalath <chamikara@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Are Dataflow containers not available yet ?
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm getting following when running some verifications.
>> >>>
>> >>> [failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\ <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>"", failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\ <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>""
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pabloem@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> +1
>> >>>> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing Dataflow templates.
>> >>>> Best
>> >>>> -P.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct runners. Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but I wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Ahmet
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <aromanenko.dev@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues were introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any regressions.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683> and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733> - These are flakiness issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do not think it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a RC2, we can choose to cherry pick https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330>
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764> - This was introduced after release-2.32.0 in https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165>. We can ignore this for 2.32.0 release.
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766> - this is another flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after release-2.32.0 (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859>). This is probably also not worth fixing for 2.32.0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <aromanenko.dev@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am I missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <goenka@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.32.0, as follows:
>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release candidate, and vote +1 if
>> >>>>>>>> no issues are found.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> >>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> >>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3],
>> >>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> >>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>> >>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>> >>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
>> >>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2].
>> >>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with validation [9].
>> >>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out our blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/ <https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/>.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>> Release Manager
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992>
>> >>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/>
>> >>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>> >>>>>>>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/>
>> >>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1 <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1>
>> >>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317>
>> >>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618 <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618>
>> >>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324>
>> >>>>>>>> [9] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107>
>> >>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image <https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz>.

+1 (non-binding)

Validated my downstream dependencies build fine against the RC.

On 8/23/21 11:48 PM, Valentyn Tymofieiev wrote:
> +1, ran several Python batch and streaming pipelines from quickstarts 
> and examples without issues and checked Dataflow containers for 
> dependency compatibility.
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:41 PM Robert Bradshaw <robertwb@google.com 
> <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>
>     +1 (binding). The artifacts and signatures look good to me.
>
>     On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:24 PM Chamikara Jayalath
>     <chamikara@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>     >
>     > +1 (binding)
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     > Cham
>     >
>     > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ankur Goenka <goenka@google.com
>     <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> Thanks for the validations.
>     >>
>     >> As for the errors. Externally built containers were not pulled
>     internally. The error should be fixed now.
>     >>
>     >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM Chamikara Jayalath
>     <chamikara@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>     >>>
>     >>> Are Dataflow containers not available yet ?
>     >>>
>     >>> I'm getting following when running some verifications.
>     >>>
>     >>> [failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with
>     ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off pulling image
>     \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>     <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>"",
>     failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff:
>     "Back-off pulling image
>     \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>     <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>""
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada
>     <pabloem@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>     >>>>
>     >>>> +1
>     >>>> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on
>     existing Dataflow templates.
>     >>>> Best
>     >>>> -P.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com
>     <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on
>     direct runners. Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open
>     issues, but I wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> Ahmet
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay
>     <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>     >>>>>>
>     >>>>>>
>     >>>>>>
>     >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko
>     <aromanenko.dev@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0
>     issues were introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we
>     don’t have any regressions.
>     >>>>>>
>     >>>>>>
>     >>>>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4
>     four:
>     >>>>>>
>     >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683> and
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733> - These are
>     flakiness issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for
>     2.32.0. I do not think it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1.
>     If there will be a RC2, we can choose to cherry pick
>     https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
>     <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330>
>     >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764> - This was
>     introduced after release-2.32.0 in
>     https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165
>     <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165>. We can ignore this
>     for 2.32.0 release.
>     >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766> - this is
>     another flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after
>     release-2.32.0 (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859
>     <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859>). This is probably
>     also not worth fixing for 2.32.0
>     >>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com
>     <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko
>     <aromanenko.dev@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect
>     this release?
>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release
>     [1]. Am I missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0
>     release?
>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>> [1]
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC>
>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <goenka@google.com
>     <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>     >>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for
>     the version 2.32.0, as follows:
>     >>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>     >>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>     specific comments)
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with
>     the release candidate, and vote +1 if
>     >>>>>>>> no issues are found.
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
>     which includes:
>     >>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>     >>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>     dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> [2], which is signed with
>     the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3],
>     >>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>     Repository [4],
>     >>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>     >>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6],
>     publishing the API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>     >>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and
>     OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
>     >>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source
>     release to the dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
>     >>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help
>     with validation [9].
>     >>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is
>     adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your
>     projects, check out our blog post at
>     https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/
>     <https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/>.
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>     >>>>>>>> Release Manager
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>> [1]
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992>
>     >>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/>
>     >>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>     >>>>>>>> [4]
>     https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
>     <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/>
>     >>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
>     <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1>
>     >>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
>     <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317>
>     >>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
>     <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618>
>     >>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
>     <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324>
>     >>>>>>>> [9]
>     https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
>     <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107>
>     >>>>>>>> [10]
>     https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>     <https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image>
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>>
>     >>>>>>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Valentyn Tymofieiev <va...@google.com>.

+1, ran several Python batch and streaming pipelines from quickstarts and
examples without issues and checked Dataflow containers for dependency
compatibility.

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:41 PM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding). The artifacts and signatures look good to me.
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:24 PM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cham
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for the validations.
> >>
> >> As for the errors. Externally built containers were not pulled
> internally. The error should be fixed now.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM Chamikara Jayalath <
> chamikara@google.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Are Dataflow containers not available yet ?
> >>>
> >>> I'm getting following when running some verifications.
> >>>
> >>> [failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with ImagePullBackOff:
> "Back-off pulling image \"
> gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>"",
> failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off
> pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>""
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pa...@google.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing
> Dataflow templates.
> >>>> Best
> >>>> -P.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct
> runners. Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but I
> wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ahmet
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <
> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues
> were introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any
> regressions.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 and
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 - These are flakiness
> issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do not think
> it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a RC2, we can
> choose to cherry pick https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 - This was
> introduced after release-2.32.0 in
> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165. We can ignore this for 2.32.0
> release.
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 - this is another
> flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after release-2.32.0
> (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859). This is probably also
> not worth fixing for 2.32.0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <
> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this
> release?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am
> I missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
> version 2.32.0, as follows:
> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the
> release candidate, and vote +1 if
> >>>>>>>> no issues are found.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> includes:
> >>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
> A6699985948 [3],
> >>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> [4],
> >>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
> >>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the
> API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
> >>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and
> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
> >>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to
> the dist.apache.org [2].
> >>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with
> validation [9].
> >>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check
> out our blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> Release Manager
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
> >>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
> >>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> >>>>>>>> [4]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
> >>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
> >>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
> >>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
> >>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
> >>>>>>>> [9]
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
> >>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>.

+1 (binding). The artifacts and signatures look good to me.

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:24 PM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Cham
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the validations.
>>
>> As for the errors. Externally built containers were not pulled internally. The error should be fixed now.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Are Dataflow containers not available yet ?
>>>
>>> I'm getting following when running some verifications.
>>>
>>> [failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\"", failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\""
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pa...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing Dataflow templates.
>>>> Best
>>>> -P.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct runners. Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but I wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ahmet
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues were introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any regressions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 - These are flakiness issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do not think it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a RC2, we can choose to cherry pick https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 - This was introduced after release-2.32.0 in https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165. We can ignore this for 2.32.0 release.
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 - this is another flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after release-2.32.0 (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859). This is probably also not worth fixing for 2.32.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am I missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.32.0, as follows:
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release candidate, and vote +1 if
>>>>>>>> no issues are found.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3],
>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
>>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with validation [9].
>>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out our blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Release Manager
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>>>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
>>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
>>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
>>>>>>>> [9] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
>>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>.

+1 (binding)

Thanks,
Cham

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the validations.
>
> As for the errors. Externally built containers were not pulled internally.
> The error should be fixed now.
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Are Dataflow containers not available yet ?
>>
>> I'm getting following when running some verifications.
>>
>> [failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with ImagePullBackOff:
>> "Back-off pulling image \"
>> gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>"",
>> failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off
>> pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>""
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pa...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing
>>> Dataflow templates.
>>> Best
>>> -P.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct
>>>> runners. Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
>>>>
>>>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but I
>>>> wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
>>>>
>>>> Ahmet
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <
>>>>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues were
>>>>>> introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any
>>>>>> regressions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 and
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 - These are
>>>>> flakiness issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do
>>>>> not think it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a
>>>>> RC2, we can choose to cherry pick
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 - This was
>>>>> introduced after release-2.32.0 in
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165. We can ignore this for
>>>>> 2.32.0 release.
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 - this is another
>>>>> flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after release-2.32.0
>>>>> (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859). This is probably
>>>>> also not worth fixing for 2.32.0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <
>>>>>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am I
>>>>>> missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>>>>>>> 2.32.0, as follows:
>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the
>>>>>>> release candidate, and vote +1 if
>>>>>>> no issues are found.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>>>>>>> A6699985948 [3],
>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
>>>>>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and
>>>>>>> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with
>>>>>>> validation [9].
>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out
>>>>>>> our blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Release Manager
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
>>>>>>> [9]
>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com>.

Thanks for the validations.

As for the errors. Externally built containers were not pulled internally.
The error should be fixed now.

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>
wrote:

> Are Dataflow containers not available yet ?
>
> I'm getting following when running some verifications.
>
> [failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off
> pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>"",
> failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off
> pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>""
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pa...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing Dataflow
>> templates.
>> Best
>> -P.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct runners.
>>> Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
>>>
>>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but I
>>> wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
>>>
>>> Ahmet
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <
>>>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues were
>>>>> introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any
>>>>> regressions.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 and
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 - These are flakiness
>>>> issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do not
>>>> think it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a RC2, we
>>>> can choose to cherry pick https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 - This was introduced
>>>> after release-2.32.0 in https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165. We
>>>> can ignore this for 2.32.0 release.
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 - this is another
>>>> flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after release-2.32.0
>>>> (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859). This is probably
>>>> also not worth fixing for 2.32.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <
>>>>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am I
>>>>> missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>>>>>> 2.32.0, as follows:
>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release
>>>>>> candidate, and vote +1 if
>>>>>> no issues are found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>>>>>> A6699985948 [3],
>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
>>>>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and
>>>>>> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with
>>>>>> validation [9].
>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out
>>>>>> our blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Release Manager
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
>>>>>> [9]
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>.

Are Dataflow containers not available yet ?

I'm getting following when running some verifications.

[failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off
pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\"",
failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff: "Back-off
pulling image \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\""



On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pa...@google.com> wrote:

> +1
> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing Dataflow
> templates.
> Best
> -P.
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct runners.
>> Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
>>
>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but I
>> wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
>>
>> Ahmet
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <
>>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>>>>
>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues were
>>>> introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any
>>>> regressions.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 and
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 - These are flakiness
>>> issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do not
>>> think it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a RC2, we
>>> can choose to cherry pick https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 - This was introduced
>>> after release-2.32.0 in https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165. We
>>> can ignore this for 2.32.0 release.
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 - this is another
>>> flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after release-2.32.0
>>> (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859). This is probably
>>> also not worth fixing for 2.32.0
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <
>>>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>>>>>
>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am I
>>>> missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>>>>> 2.32.0, as follows:
>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release
>>>>> candidate, and vote +1 if
>>>>> no issues are found.
>>>>>
>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>>>>> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3],
>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
>>>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and OpenJDK/Oracle
>>>>> JDK 1.8.0_181.
>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with
>>>>> validation [9].
>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>>>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>
>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out
>>>>> our blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Release Manager
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>> [4]
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
>>>>> [9]
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Pablo Estrada <pa...@google.com>.

+1
I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing Dataflow
templates.
Best
-P.

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:

> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct runners.
> Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
>
> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but I
> wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
>
> Ahmet
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <
>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>>>
>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues were
>>> introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any
>>> regressions.
>>>
>>
>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 and
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 - These are flakiness
>> issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do not
>> think it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a RC2, we
>> can choose to cherry pick https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 - This was introduced
>> after release-2.32.0 in https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165. We
>> can ignore this for 2.32.0 release.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 - this is another flaky
>> integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after release-2.32.0 (after
>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859). This is probably also not
>> worth fixing for 2.32.0
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <
>>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>>>>
>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am I
>>> missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>>>> 2.32.0, as follows:
>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release
>>>> candidate, and vote +1 if
>>>> no issues are found.
>>>>
>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>>>> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3],
>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
>>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and OpenJDK/Oracle
>>>> JDK 1.8.0_181.
>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with
>>>> validation [9].
>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>
>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out
>>>> our blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Release Manager
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>> [4]
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
>>>> [9]
>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>.

+1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct runners.
Thank you Ankur for preparing this.

I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but I wanted
to start the validation as much as possible.

Ahmet

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>>
>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues were
>> introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any
>> regressions.
>>
>
> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 and
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 - These are flakiness
> issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do not
> think it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a RC2, we
> can choose to cherry pick https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 - This was introduced
> after release-2.32.0 in https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165. We can
> ignore this for 2.32.0 release.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 - this is another flaky
> integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after release-2.32.0 (after
> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859). This is probably also not
> worth fixing for 2.32.0
>
>
>>
>>
>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <
>> aromanenko.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>>>
>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release?
>>>
>>
>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am I
>> missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>>
>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>>> 2.32.0, as follows:
>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>>
>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release
>>> candidate, and vote +1 if
>>> no issues are found.
>>>
>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>>> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3],
>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and OpenJDK/Oracle
>>> JDK 1.8.0_181.
>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with validation
>>> [9].
>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>
>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out our
>>> blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Release Manager
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>> [4]
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
>>> [9]
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>.

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>
> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues were
> introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any
> regressions.
>

Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 - These are flakiness
issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0. I do not
think it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there will be a RC2, we
can choose to cherry pick https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 - This was introduced
after release-2.32.0 in https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165. We can
ignore this for 2.32.0 release.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 - this is another flaky
integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after release-2.32.0 (after
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859). This is probably also not worth
fixing for 2.32.0


>
>
> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Ankur!
>>
>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release?
>>
>
> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am I
> missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>
>
>
>>
>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>> 2.32.0, as follows:
>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>>
>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release
>> candidate, and vote +1 if
>> no issues are found.
>>
>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3],
>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and OpenJDK/Oracle
>> JDK 1.8.0_181.
>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>> dist.apache.org [2].
>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with validation
>> [9].
>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>
>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out our
>> blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Release Manager
>>
>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> [4]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
>> [9]
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>.

Yes, you are right, Ahmet.

Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues were introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any regressions. 


> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <aromanenko.dev@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Thanks, Ankur! 
> 
> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release?
> 
> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am I missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
> 
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC>
> 
>  
> 
>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <goenka@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.32.0, as follows:
>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> 
>> 
>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release candidate, and vote +1 if
>> no issues are found.
>> 
>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3],
>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2].
>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with validation [9].
>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>> 
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> 
>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out our blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/ <https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/>.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Release Manager
>> 
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992>
>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/>
>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/>
>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1 <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1>
>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317>
>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618 <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618>
>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324>
>> [9] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107>
>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image <https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>.

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks, Ankur!
>
> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release?
>

I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am I missing
something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?

[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC



>
> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.32.0,
> as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
>
> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release
> candidate, and vote +1 if
> no issues are found.
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and OpenJDK/Oracle JDK
> 1.8.0_181.
> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
> dist.apache.org [2].
> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with validation
> [9].
> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>
> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out our
> blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.
>
> Thanks,
> Release Manager
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
> [9]
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.32.0, release candidate #1

Posted by Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>.

Thanks, Ankur! 

There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release?

> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <go...@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.32.0, as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> 
> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release candidate, and vote +1 if
> no issues are found.
> 
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2].
> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with validation [9].
> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> 
> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out our blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/ <https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/>.
> 
> Thanks,
> Release Manager
> 
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992>
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/>
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/>
> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1 <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1>
> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317>
> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618 <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618>
> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324>
> [9] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107>
> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image <https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image>