You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@felix.apache.org by ri...@apache.org on 2010/01/05 17:42:38 UTC
svn commit: r896122 -
/felix/sandbox/rickhall/resolver/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/resolver/Main.java
Author: rickhall
Date: Tue Jan 5 16:42:37 2010
New Revision: 896122
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896122&view=rev
Log:
Added some comments to scenarios.
Modified:
felix/sandbox/rickhall/resolver/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/resolver/Main.java
Modified: felix/sandbox/rickhall/resolver/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/resolver/Main.java
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/sandbox/rickhall/resolver/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/resolver/Main.java?rev=896122&r1=896121&r2=896122&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- felix/sandbox/rickhall/resolver/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/resolver/Main.java (original)
+++ felix/sandbox/rickhall/resolver/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/resolver/Main.java Tue Jan 5 16:42:37 2010
@@ -616,6 +616,8 @@
return target;
}
+ // SOLUTION:
+ // A: bar->[B,C]
private static Module scenario12(List<Module> moduleList)
{
Module m, target;
@@ -629,8 +631,8 @@
moduleList.add(
(m = new Module("B"))
.providing(new CapabilityImpl(m, Capability.MODULE_NAMESPACE).with("bundle-symbolic-name=B"))
-// .providing(new CapabilityImpl(m, Capability.PACKAGE_NAMESPACE).with("package=bar").using("foo"))
- .providing(new CapabilityImpl(m, Capability.PACKAGE_NAMESPACE).with("package=bar"))
+ .providing(new CapabilityImpl(m, Capability.PACKAGE_NAMESPACE).with("package=bar").using("foo"))
+// .providing(new CapabilityImpl(m, Capability.PACKAGE_NAMESPACE).with("package=bar"))
.requiring(new RequirementImpl(Capability.PACKAGE_NAMESPACE).with("package=foo").with("version=[1.0.0,2.0.0)")));
// Bundle C
moduleList.add(
@@ -687,6 +689,8 @@
return target;
}
+ // SOLUTION:
+ // A: bar->[A,B,C]
private static Module scenario14(List<Module> moduleList)
{
Module m, target;
@@ -711,6 +715,10 @@
return target;
}
+ // SOLUTION:
+ // A: bar->B, foo->F
+ // B: bar->[B,C,D]
+ // D: foo->F
private static Module scenario15(List<Module> moduleList)
{
Module m, target;
@@ -719,7 +727,7 @@
moduleList.add(
target = (m = new Module("A"))
.requiring(new RequirementImpl(Capability.PACKAGE_NAMESPACE).with("package=bar").with("vendor=B"))
- .requiring(new RequirementImpl(Capability.PACKAGE_NAMESPACE).with("package=foo").with("vendor=E")));
+ .requiring(new RequirementImpl(Capability.PACKAGE_NAMESPACE).with("package=foo").with("vendor=F")));
// Bundle B
moduleList.add(
(m = new Module("B"))
@@ -744,11 +752,17 @@
// Bundle F
moduleList.add(
(m = new Module("F"))
- .providing(new CapabilityImpl(m, Capability.PACKAGE_NAMESPACE).with("package=foo").with("vendor=E")));
+ .providing(new CapabilityImpl(m, Capability.PACKAGE_NAMESPACE).with("package=foo").with("vendor=F")));
return target;
}
+ // SOLUTION:
+ // A: bar->C, foo->B
+ // B: foo->B, bar->[B,C,D]
+// TODO: PROTO3 RESOLVER - Uses constraints are not added to the package space if
+// there is a matching imported/exported package. It probably still needs to
+// be to detect future conflicts or does it since the hard constraint rules?
private static Module scenario16(List<Module> moduleList)
{
Module m, target;
@@ -779,6 +793,8 @@
return target;
}
+ // SOLUTION:
+ // Cannot resolve A's import of bar.
private static Module scenario17(List<Module> moduleList)
{
Module m, target;
@@ -827,6 +843,10 @@
return target;
}
+ // SOLUTION:
+ // A: foo->B, bar->D, woz->BB
+ // B: bar->[B,C,D]
+ // BB: bar->[BB,CC,D]
private static Module scenario18(List<Module> moduleList)
{
Module m, target;