You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@ponymail.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/06/14 07:45:04 UTC

[GitHub] [incubator-ponymail-foal] sbp opened a new issue #46: Consider the Archived-At header in DKIM-ID generation

sbp opened a new issue #46:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-ponymail-foal/issues/46


   The `Archived-At` header was introduced by [RFC 5064](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5064) for mailing list managers to give a link to an archived message. It was not included in [RFC 6376 § 5.4.1](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6376#section-5.4.1) as a recommended header to sign, even though it did recommend signing `List-Archive`. Since `Archived-At` is a refinement of `List-Archive` with a very similar purpose it may be worthwhile including it in the DKIM-ID generation algorithm. Its omission from RFC 6376, whose recommendations are not anyway intended to be exhaustive, was possibly an oversight.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [incubator-ponymail-foal] sebbASF commented on issue #46: Consider the Archived-At header in DKIM-ID generation

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.

sebbASF commented on issue #46:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-ponymail-foal/issues/46#issuecomment-859514121


   It depends when it is added as a header. If it is only ever added by the original list manager, that would be OK.
   However if it can be added later, then it would affect the stability of id generation.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org