You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Bryan Kennedy <sp...@hotmail.com> on 2007/08/25 16:04:07 UTC
Backport request: r26077 to 1.4.5
Howdy,
I'd like to request that r26077 (adding neon 0.26.4 to the allowed list) be backported to 1.4.5.
Thanks,
--
Bryan Kennedy
_________________________________________________________________
Explore the seven wonders of the world
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
Re: Backport request: r26077 to 1.4.5
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@collab.net>.
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> 2007-08-25 22:57:48 Blair Zajac napisał(a):
> > Has anybody else used svn 1.4.x with neon 0.26.4?
>
> I was using them for a relatively short time, and I can confirm that they were working correctly.
I've nominated it for backport.
Re: Backport request: r26077 to 1.4.5
Posted by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <ar...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
2007-08-25 22:57:48 Blair Zajac napisał(a):
> Has anybody else used svn 1.4.x with neon 0.26.4?
I was using them for a relatively short time, and I can confirm that they were working correctly.
- --
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG0KPA/axNJ4Xo/ZERAh8GAKCVlkHER/HjLgfcGpRYPKgJnJ0/ZQCdEFdX
ADnw2MeJMUmRx8rPKSdZaNc=
=0Evn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Backport request: r26077 to 1.4.5
Posted by Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com>.
On Aug 25, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Bryan Kennedy wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I'd like to request that r26077 (adding neon 0.26.4 to the allowed
> list) be backported to 1.4.5.
>
> Thanks,
I was going to nominate this, but after looking at my MacPorts
install, it's still using 0.26.3 (which I was surprised about), so I
haven't personally verified that 0.26.4 works.
Has anybody else used svn 1.4.x with neon 0.26.4?
Regards,
Blair
--
Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
CTO, OrcaWare Technologies
<bl...@orcaware.com>
Subversion training, consulting and support
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org