You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by "Warren Togami Jr." <wt...@gmail.com> on 2011/01/13 12:19:09 UTC
Question about ReturnPath and IADB
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/felicity/70_iadb.cf?revision=789457&view=co
# we already check for this
#header RCVD_IN_IADB_HABEAS
eval:check_rbl_sub('iadb-firsttrusted', '^127.2.255.101$')
#describe RCVD_IN_IADB_HABEAS IADB: Sender participates in
Habeas program
#tflags RCVD_IN_IADB_HABEAS net nice
# we already check for this
#header RCVD_IN_IADB_BONDEDSENDER
eval:check_rbl_sub('iadb-firsttrusted', '^127.2.255.102$')
#describe RCVD_IN_AIDB_BONDEDSENDER IADB: Sender participates in
Bonded Sender program
#tflags RCVD_IN_IADB_BONDEDSENDER net nice
Does this mean that IADB syndicates ReturnPath's "safe" and "certified"
lists? How up-to-date is this syndication?
I ask, because if they are kept up-to-date, we could eliminate two DNS
queries per mail and reuse this existing DNS query for these two rules.
http://www.spamtips.org/2011/01/usage-limits-of-spamassassin-network.html
This further matters because ReturnPath advertises a limit of 100k
queries per today, while IADB seems to have no query limit and they have
free data feeds.
Warren
Re: Question about ReturnPath and IADB
Posted by "Warren Togami Jr." <wt...@gmail.com>.
http://www.isipp.com/iadb.php
It is a little confusing. I can only guess that this company inherited
the "assets" of a previous company or rebranded, kind of like how
ReturnPath's two lists were not always branded ReturnPath.
On 1/13/2011 5:46 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> IADB was replaced with SuretyMail. I'm not sure we can detangle that one
> is a replacement for the other:
>
> http://www.isipp.com/others.html
>
> Regards,
> KAM
>
> On 1/13/2011 6:19 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/felicity/70_iadb.cf?revision=789457&view=co
>>
>> # we already check for this
>> #header RCVD_IN_IADB_HABEAS eval:check_rbl_sub('iadb-firsttrusted',
>> '^127.2.255.101$')
>> #describe RCVD_IN_IADB_HABEAS IADB: Sender participates in Habeas program
>> #tflags RCVD_IN_IADB_HABEAS net nice
>>
>> # we already check for this
>> #header RCVD_IN_IADB_BONDEDSENDER
>> eval:check_rbl_sub('iadb-firsttrusted', '^127.2.255.102$')
>> #describe RCVD_IN_AIDB_BONDEDSENDER IADB: Sender participates in
>> Bonded Sender program
>> #tflags RCVD_IN_IADB_BONDEDSENDER net nice
>>
>> Does this mean that IADB syndicates ReturnPath's "safe" and
>> "certified" lists? How up-to-date is this syndication?
>>
>> I ask, because if they are kept up-to-date, we could eliminate two DNS
>> queries per mail and reuse this existing DNS query for these two rules.
>>
>> http://www.spamtips.org/2011/01/usage-limits-of-spamassassin-network.html
>> This further matters because ReturnPath advertises a limit of 100k
>> queries per today, while IADB seems to have no query limit and they
>> have free data feeds.
>>
>> Warren
>
Re: Question about ReturnPath and IADB
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <KM...@PCCC.com>.
IADB was replaced with SuretyMail. I'm not sure we can detangle that
one is a replacement for the other:
http://www.isipp.com/others.html
Regards,
KAM
On 1/13/2011 6:19 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/felicity/70_iadb.cf?revision=789457&view=co
>
> # we already check for this
> #header RCVD_IN_IADB_HABEAS eval:check_rbl_sub('iadb-firsttrusted',
> '^127.2.255.101$')
> #describe RCVD_IN_IADB_HABEAS IADB: Sender participates in
> Habeas program
> #tflags RCVD_IN_IADB_HABEAS net nice
>
> # we already check for this
> #header RCVD_IN_IADB_BONDEDSENDER
> eval:check_rbl_sub('iadb-firsttrusted', '^127.2.255.102$')
> #describe RCVD_IN_AIDB_BONDEDSENDER IADB: Sender participates in
> Bonded Sender program
> #tflags RCVD_IN_IADB_BONDEDSENDER net nice
>
> Does this mean that IADB syndicates ReturnPath's "safe" and
> "certified" lists? How up-to-date is this syndication?
>
> I ask, because if they are kept up-to-date, we could eliminate two DNS
> queries per mail and reuse this existing DNS query for these two rules.
>
> http://www.spamtips.org/2011/01/usage-limits-of-spamassassin-network.html
> This further matters because ReturnPath advertises a limit of 100k
> queries per today, while IADB seems to have no query limit and they
> have free data feeds.
>
> Warren
Re: Question about ReturnPath and IADB
Posted by "J.D. Falk" <jd...@cybernothing.org>.
On Jan 13, 2011, at 3:19 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> Does this mean that IADB syndicates ReturnPath's "safe" and "certified" lists? How up-to-date is this syndication?
I'll check, but I'm fairly sure that IADB is /not/ republishing our current data.
It's possible that they republished Bonded Sender at some point in the distant past.
Not sure if IADB's stuff is even being actively maintained anymore.
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc.