You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@texera.apache.org by "carloea2 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2026/08/31 03:04:08 UTC

[PR] fix(pyamber): validate table row fields [texera]

carloea2 opened a new pull request, #8206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/8206

   ### What changes were proposed in this PR?
   
   Use an explicit ValueError when table rows have different field names, so optimized Python cannot remove the validation.
   
   ### Any related issues, documentation, discussions?
   
   Closes #8205
   
   ### How was this PR tested?
   
   ```text
   python -c "import sys,pytest; sys.path[:0]=[r'<worktree>ambersrcmainpython',r'<main-checkout>ambersrcmainpython']; raise SystemExit(pytest.main([r'amber/src/test/python/core/models/test_table.py','-q','-p','no:cacheprovider']))"
   18 passed
   
   python -O -c "import sys,pytest; sys.path[:0]=[r'<worktree>ambersrcmainpython',r'<main-checkout>ambersrcmainpython']; raise SystemExit(pytest.main([r'amber/src/test/python/core/models/test_table.py::TestTable::test_validation_of_schema','-q','-p','no:cacheprovider']))"
   1 passed
   
   ruff check amber/src/main/python amber/src/test/python
   All checks passed
   
   ruff format --check amber/src/main/python amber/src/test/python
   213 files already formatted
   ```
   
   ### Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   
   Generated-by: Codex


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@texera.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] fix(pyamber): validate table row fields [texera]

Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #8206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/8206#issuecomment-5473171482

   <!-- texera-reviewer-suggestion -->
   ### Automated Reviewer Suggestions
   
   Based on the `git blame` history of the changed files, we recommend the following reviewers:
   
   - **Contributors with relevant context:** `@aglinxinyuan`
     You can notify them by mentioning `@aglinxinyuan` in a comment.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@texera.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] fix(pyamber): validate table row fields [texera]

Posted by "codecov-commenter (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
codecov-commenter commented on PR #8206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/8206#issuecomment-5473189071

   ## [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/pull/8206?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) Report
   :white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
   :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 93.94%. Comparing base ([`70c2114`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/commit/70c21145887920528d7d5540e3fb790b43e8b759?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)) to head ([`936f416`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/commit/936f41650e079b5432cba455d62c865b23c6fe69?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)).
   
   <details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>
   
   
   
   ```diff
   @@            Coverage Diff            @@
   ##               main    #8206   +/-   ##
   =========================================
     Coverage     93.94%   93.94%           
     Complexity     4759     4759           
   =========================================
     Files          1185     1185           
     Lines         48069    48069           
     Branches       5359     5359           
   =========================================
     Hits          45159    45159           
     Misses         1480     1480           
     Partials       1430     1430           
   ```
   
   | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/pull/8206/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | Coverage Δ | | *Carryforward flag |
   |---|---|---|---|
   | [access-control-service](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/pull/8206/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | `81.00% <ø> (ø)` | | Carriedforward from [70c2114](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/commit/70c21145887920528d7d5540e3fb790b43e8b759?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) |
   | [agent-service](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/pull/8206/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | `99.32% <ø> (ø)` | | Carriedforward from [70c2114](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/commit/70c21145887920528d7d5540e3fb790b43e8b759?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) |
   | [amber](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/pull/8206/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | `89.99% <ø> (ø)` | | Carriedforward from [70c2114](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/commit/70c21145887920528d7d5540e3fb790b43e8b759?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) |
   | [computing-unit-managing-service](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/pull/8206/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | `73.67% <ø> (ø)` | | Carriedforward from [70c2114](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/commit/70c21145887920528d7d5540e3fb790b43e8b759?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) |
   | [config-service](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/pull/8206/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | `86.86% <ø> (ø)` | | Carriedforward from [70c2114](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/commit/70c21145887920528d7d5540e3fb790b43e8b759?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) |
   | [file-service](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/pull/8206/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | `87.91% <ø> (ø)` | | Carriedforward from [70c2114](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/commit/70c21145887920528d7d5540e3fb790b43e8b759?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) |
   | [frontend](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/pull/8206/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | `96.49% <ø> (ø)` | | Carriedforward from [70c2114](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/commit/70c21145887920528d7d5540e3fb790b43e8b759?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) |
   | [notebook-migration-service](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/pull/8206/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | `79.31% <ø> (ø)` | | Carriedforward from [70c2114](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/commit/70c21145887920528d7d5540e3fb790b43e8b759?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) |
   | [pyamber](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/pull/8206/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | `98.87% <100.00%> (ø)` | | |
   | [workflow-compiling-service](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/pull/8206/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | `77.19% <ø> (ø)` | | Carriedforward from [70c2114](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/commit/70c21145887920528d7d5540e3fb790b43e8b759?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) |
   
   *This pull request uses carry forward flags. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) to find out more.
   </details>
   
   [:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Harness](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/texera/pull/8206?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache).   
   :loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? [Share it here](https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache).
   <details><summary> :rocket: New features to boost your workflow: </summary>
   
   - :package: [JS Bundle Analysis](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/javascript-bundle-analysis): Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
   </details>


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@texera.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] fix(pyamber): validate table row fields [texera]

Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #8206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/8206#issuecomment-5473171175

   <!-- backport-auto-label-report -->
   ### Backport auto-label report
   
   This `fix:` PR was checked against each actively-supported release branch. `release/*` labels drive the post-merge backport, so add or remove one to change where this fix lands.
   
   | Release branch | Analysis |
   | --- | --- |
   | ⚠️ `release/v1.3` | Not labeled automatically — none of the files this PR modifies exist on this branch (`amber/src/main/python/core/models/table.py`, `amber/src/test/python/core/models/test_table.py`). The fix may target code that isn't on this release, or the files were moved/renamed after the branch was cut. **Please check and add `release/v1.3` by hand if this fix should be backported here.** |
   | ✅ `release/v1.2` | Change detected on this branch — label added; this fix is queued to backport here. Requested review from @xuang7. |
   
   _[Auto-label run](https://github.com/apache/texera/actions/runs/33352622793)._


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@texera.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] feat(pyamber): validate table row fields [texera]

Posted by "carloea2 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
carloea2 closed pull request #8206: feat(pyamber): validate table row fields
URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/8206


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@texera.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] fix(pyamber): validate table row fields [texera]

Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #8206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/8206#issuecomment-5473212074

   <!-- texera-benchmarks-comment -->
   ## ⚠️ Benchmark changes need a look
   
   🟢 2 better · 🔴 4 worse · ⚪ 9 noise (<±5%) · 0 without baseline
   
   > Compared against main `70c2114` benchmarked on **this same runner**, so the delta is largely free of cross-runner hardware noise. The "7d avg" column still reflects the gh-pages dashboard. Treat <±5% as noise unless repeated.
   
   [Dashboard](https://apache.github.io/texera/dev/bench/) · [Run](https://github.com/apache/texera/actions/runs/33352633895)
   
   | | config | throughput | MB/s | latency | max Δ latest / 7d |
   |---|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
   | 🟢 | bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 | 387 | 0.236 | 25,036/31,791/31,791 us | 🟢 -5.1% / 🔴 +115.0% |
   | 🔴 | bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 | 767 | 0.468 | 125,882/198,743/198,743 us | 🔴 +31.7% / 🔴 +96.9% |
   | ⚪ | bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 | 902 | 0.55 | 1,108,105/1,166,733/1,166,733 us | ⚪ within ±5% / 🔴 +20.6% |
   
   <details><summary>Baseline details</summary>
   
   Latest main `70c2114` from same runner
   
   | config | metric | PR | latest main | 7d avg | Δ latest | Δ 7d |
   |---|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|
   | bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 | throughput | 387 tuples/sec | 400 tuples/sec | 844.57 tuples/sec | -3.3% | -54.2% |
   | bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 | MB/s | 0.236 MB/s | 0.244 MB/s | 0.515 MB/s | -3.3% | -54.2% |
   | bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 | p50 | 25,036 us | 25,200 us | 11,837 us | -0.6% | +111.5% |
   | bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 | p95 | 31,791 us | 33,499 us | 14,788 us | -5.1% | +115.0% |
   | bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 | p99 | 31,791 us | 33,499 us | 17,651 us | -5.1% | +80.1% |
   | bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 | throughput | 767 tuples/sec | 817 tuples/sec | 1,084 tuples/sec | -6.1% | -29.2% |
   | bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 | MB/s | 0.468 MB/s | 0.499 MB/s | 0.662 MB/s | -6.2% | -29.3% |
   | bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 | p50 | 125,882 us | 120,213 us | 94,505 us | +4.7% | +33.2% |
   | bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 | p95 | 198,743 us | 150,940 us | 100,941 us | +31.7% | +96.9% |
   | bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 | p99 | 198,743 us | 150,940 us | 108,642 us | +31.7% | +82.9% |
   | bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 | throughput | 902 tuples/sec | 906 tuples/sec | 1,119 tuples/sec | -0.4% | -19.4% |
   | bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 | MB/s | 0.55 MB/s | 0.553 MB/s | 0.683 MB/s | -0.5% | -19.5% |
   | bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 | p50 | 1,108,105 us | 1,100,545 us | 924,404 us | +0.7% | +19.9% |
   | bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 | p95 | 1,166,733 us | 1,174,712 us | 967,785 us | -0.7% | +20.6% |
   | bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 | p99 | 1,166,733 us | 1,174,712 us | 995,630 us | -0.7% | +17.2% |
   
   </details>
   
   <details><summary>Raw CSV</summary>
   
   ```csv
   config_idx,batch_size,schema_width,string_len,num_batches,total_ms,total_tuples,total_bytes,tuples_per_sec,mb_per_sec,lat_p50_us,lat_p95_us,lat_p99_us
   0,10,10,64,20,517.10,200,128000,387,0.236,25036.40,31791.22,31791.22
   1,100,10,64,20,2607.78,2000,1280000,767,0.468,125882.44,198743.32,198743.32
   2,1000,10,64,20,22180.12,20000,12800000,902,0.550,1108105.40,1166733.05,1166733.05
   ```
   
   </details>
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@texera.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] feat(pyamber): validate table row fields [texera]

Posted by "carloea2 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
carloea2 commented on PR #8206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/8206#issuecomment-6030569808

   Closing this small validation change to focus on higher priority work. The linked issue remains open.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@texera.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org