You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@community.apache.org by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> on 2016/02/17 22:51:27 UTC
ApacheCon CFP review committee
By now, you should have received email from the ApacheCon CFP system
with your system credentials. Note that the email was rather confusingly
titled "EVENT NAME: Review Site Now Open" which caused me to overlook it
at first.
Thanks to all who have volunteered for this tasks.
--
Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: ApacheCon CFP review committee
Posted by Jan Willem Janssen <ja...@luminis.eu>.
> On 18 Feb 2016, at 11:57, Sharan Foga <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I've been using the notes field to add my comments; It is a bit slower though as the notes field is not included in the main review window.
I overlooked that completely! Thanks for the pointer. It would be indeed way more handy if that field was included in the review window...
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
> Le 18/02/2016 11:49, Jan Willem Janssen a écrit :
>>> On 18 Feb 2016, at 07:52, Justin Mclean<ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> Rich, I only got access to review ApacheCon (formerly Core) submissions; no
>>>> the Big Data ones.
>>> Same here (I think). If we find big data talk submitted to core should we a)
>>> ask them to be moved to big data OR b) reject them. Seem to recall we had
>>> this issue last time as well.
>> I’ve reviewed a couple of submissions and saw quite a few that should be moved
>> to BigData. So far, I’ve rejected them and added a “move to big data” as
>> category. I hope that somebody “behind the scenes” is willing and able to
>> move these proposals to the right conference track. It would be a shame if
>> proposals are rejected because they’re submitted to the incorrect
>> conference…
>>
>> BTW: am I the only one that is missing out on a comment field to add
>> additional comments why I want to accept or reject a proposal?
>>
>> --
>> Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards
>>
>> Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
>> +31 631 765 814
>>
>>
>> My world is something with Amdatu and Apache
>>
>> Luminis Technologies
>> Churchillplein 1
>> 7314 BZ Apeldoorn
>> +31 88 586 46 00
>>
>> https://www.luminis.eu
>>
>> KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
>> BTW (VAT) NL8170.94.441.B.01
>>
>
--
Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards
Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
+31 631 765 814
My world is something with Amdatu and Apache
Luminis Technologies
Churchillplein 1
7314 BZ Apeldoorn
+31 88 586 46 00
https://www.luminis.eu
KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
BTW (VAT) NL8170.94.441.B.01
Re: ApacheCon CFP review committee
Posted by Sharan Foga <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hi
I've been using the notes field to add my comments; It is a bit slower
though as the notes field is not included in the main review window.
Thanks
Sharan
Le 18/02/2016 11:49, Jan Willem Janssen a écrit :
>> On 18 Feb 2016, at 07:52, Justin Mclean<ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Rich, I only got access to review ApacheCon (formerly Core) submissions; no
>>> the Big Data ones.
>> Same here (I think). If we find big data talk submitted to core should we a)
>> ask them to be moved to big data OR b) reject them. Seem to recall we had
>> this issue last time as well.
> I’ve reviewed a couple of submissions and saw quite a few that should be moved
> to BigData. So far, I’ve rejected them and added a “move to big data” as
> category. I hope that somebody “behind the scenes” is willing and able to
> move these proposals to the right conference track. It would be a shame if
> proposals are rejected because they’re submitted to the incorrect
> conference…
>
> BTW: am I the only one that is missing out on a comment field to add
> additional comments why I want to accept or reject a proposal?
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards
>
> Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
> +31 631 765 814
>
>
> My world is something with Amdatu and Apache
>
> Luminis Technologies
> Churchillplein 1
> 7314 BZ Apeldoorn
> +31 88 586 46 00
>
> https://www.luminis.eu
>
> KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
> BTW (VAT) NL8170.94.441.B.01
>
Re: ApacheCon CFP review committee
Posted by Jan Willem Janssen <ja...@luminis.eu>.
> On 18 Feb 2016, at 07:52, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Rich, I only got access to review ApacheCon (formerly Core) submissions; no
>> the Big Data ones.
>
> Same here (I think). If we find big data talk submitted to core should we a)
> ask them to be moved to big data OR b) reject them. Seem to recall we had
> this issue last time as well.
I’ve reviewed a couple of submissions and saw quite a few that should be moved
to BigData. So far, I’ve rejected them and added a “move to big data” as
category. I hope that somebody “behind the scenes” is willing and able to
move these proposals to the right conference track. It would be a shame if
proposals are rejected because they’re submitted to the incorrect
conference…
BTW: am I the only one that is missing out on a comment field to add
additional comments why I want to accept or reject a proposal?
--
Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards
Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
+31 631 765 814
My world is something with Amdatu and Apache
Luminis Technologies
Churchillplein 1
7314 BZ Apeldoorn
+31 88 586 46 00
https://www.luminis.eu
KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
BTW (VAT) NL8170.94.441.B.01
Re: ApacheCon CFP review committee
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Rich, I only got access to review ApacheCon (formerly Core) submissions; no
> the Big Data ones.
Same here (I think). If we find big data talk submitted to core should we a) ask them to be moved to big data OR b) reject them. Seem to recall we had this issue last time as well.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: ApacheCon CFP review committee
Posted by Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>.
Rich, I only got access to review ApacheCon (formerly Core) submissions; no
the Big Data ones.
Is that something expected or an error?
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm on the road with limited internet so I haven't looked, but when are
>> reviews due?
>>
>
> The CfP says that notifications are due Feb 29, which is also the date
> that conferenceabstracts.com shows.
>
> So if we want to have some time to discuss the final details, we should
> hurry up I guess.
>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
Re: ApacheCon CFP review committee
Posted by Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> I'm on the road with limited internet so I haven't looked, but when are
> reviews due?
>
The CfP says that notifications are due Feb 29, which is also the date that
conferenceabstracts.com shows.
So if we want to have some time to discuss the final details, we should
hurry up I guess.
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
Re: ApacheCon CFP review committee
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Hi Rich,
I'm on the road with limited internet so I haven't looked, but when are
reviews due?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 2/17/16, 1:51 PM, "Rich Bowen" <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>By now, you should have received email from the ApacheCon CFP system
>with your system credentials. Note that the email was rather confusingly
>titled "EVENT NAME: Review Site Now Open" which caused me to overlook it
>at first.
>
>Thanks to all who have volunteered for this tasks.
>
>--
>Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
>http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon