You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@druid.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/01/13 10:39:40 UTC

[GitHub] [druid] JulianJaffePinterest commented on pull request #12060: IN filters for numeric go through selector filters and in filters now

JulianJaffePinterest commented on pull request #12060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/12060#issuecomment-1012009899


   Do you know how much of the 10 second runtime was planning vs execution? (e.g. does this fix resolve #7904 and the 10 seconds are due to execution, or is there still additional room for improvement in planning large IN clauses?)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@druid.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@druid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@druid.apache.org