You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucy.apache.org by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com> on 2013/07/23 06:14:10 UTC
[lucy-dev] Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucy 0.3.3 RC 1
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com> wrote:
> [ ] +1 Release RC 1 as Apache Lucy 0.3.3.
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release RC 1 as Apache Lucy 0.3.3 because...
Here's my +1.
Checking <https://wiki.apache.org/lucy/ReleasePrep>:
* There are no new files in 0.3.3 compared to 0.3.2, so the RAT report won't
have changed.
* The issue tracker is clean for 0.3.3.
* The NOTICE file has an up-to-date copyright.
* The CHANGES file has a list of issues and today's date.
* No changes to LICENSE and NOTICE from 0.3.2.
* I tested the branch (though not this tarball) on the following systems:
* Strawberry Perl 5.14.2
* Cygwin Perl 5.10.1
* ActivePerl 5.14.2
* Perl 5.18.0 OS X
* Perl 5.10.0 CentOS 5
* I ran test_valgrind under a debugging Perl 5.18.0 and though it didn't
pass per se, I examined the output and found no problems.
Checking <https://wiki.apache.org/lucy/ReleaseVerification>:
* Sigs and sums OK.
* Builds and tests under Perl 5.18.0 and stock 5.12.4 on OS X.
* CPAN downstream dist builds and tests OK.
Marvin Humphrey
Re: [lucy-dev] Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucy 0.3.3 RC 1
Posted by Logan Bell <lo...@gmail.com>.
+1
* Sigs and sums match
* All downstream artifacts are in place
* Able to build successfully with Perl 5.18.0 on Mac OSX 10.8.4
Congrats!
Logan
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>
> wrote:
>
> > [ ] +1 Release RC 1 as Apache Lucy 0.3.3.
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release RC 1 as Apache Lucy 0.3.3 because...
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Checking <https://wiki.apache.org/lucy/ReleasePrep>:
>
> * There are no new files in 0.3.3 compared to 0.3.2, so the RAT report
> won't
> have changed.
> * The issue tracker is clean for 0.3.3.
> * The NOTICE file has an up-to-date copyright.
> * The CHANGES file has a list of issues and today's date.
> * No changes to LICENSE and NOTICE from 0.3.2.
> * I tested the branch (though not this tarball) on the following systems:
> * Strawberry Perl 5.14.2
> * Cygwin Perl 5.10.1
> * ActivePerl 5.14.2
> * Perl 5.18.0 OS X
> * Perl 5.10.0 CentOS 5
> * I ran test_valgrind under a debugging Perl 5.18.0 and though it didn't
> pass per se, I examined the output and found no problems.
>
> Checking <https://wiki.apache.org/lucy/ReleaseVerification>:
>
> * Sigs and sums OK.
> * Builds and tests under Perl 5.18.0 and stock 5.12.4 on OS X.
> * CPAN downstream dist builds and tests OK.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>