You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> on 2013/06/26 16:04:58 UTC
3.0.3 and 3.1B3?
Hi Andrus,
Since you are talking about 3.2M1, should we also consider a 3.0.3 (maybe
make that a final release barring critical bugs) and a 3.1B3 (or maybe RC1)?
mrg
Re: 3.0.3 and 3.1B3?
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Good point. Our only physical limitation is the PMC capacity to evaluate and vote on the releases. I guess let's do them one by one and see how that goes.
A.
On Jun 26, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> No one I know will use 3.1 until it is 3.1 Final (or even 3.1.1) ... so I
> think a 3.0.3 for those people would make a little sense and make that the
> final release.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>wrote:
>
>> I could care less about 3.0.3, but maybe other people do?
>>
>> +1 for 3.1RC1
>>
>> On Jun 26, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrus,
>>>
>>> Since you are talking about 3.2M1, should we also consider a 3.0.3 (maybe
>>> make that a final release barring critical bugs) and a 3.1B3 (or maybe
>> RC1)?
>>>
>>> mrg
>>
>>
Re: 3.0.3 and 3.1B3?
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
No one I know will use 3.1 until it is 3.1 Final (or even 3.1.1) ... so I
think a 3.0.3 for those people would make a little sense and make that the
final release.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>wrote:
> I could care less about 3.0.3, but maybe other people do?
>
> +1 for 3.1RC1
>
> On Jun 26, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrus,
> >
> > Since you are talking about 3.2M1, should we also consider a 3.0.3 (maybe
> > make that a final release barring critical bugs) and a 3.1B3 (or maybe
> RC1)?
> >
> > mrg
>
>
Re: 3.0.3 and 3.1B3?
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
I could care less about 3.0.3, but maybe other people do?
+1 for 3.1RC1
On Jun 26, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> Hi Andrus,
>
> Since you are talking about 3.2M1, should we also consider a 3.0.3 (maybe
> make that a final release barring critical bugs) and a 3.1B3 (or maybe RC1)?
>
> mrg