You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by Troy Curtis Jr <tr...@gmail.com> on 2006/09/13 05:03:56 UTC

Perl Repository Lock support

Has anyone created a patch for the perl bindings that support
repository locking?

Barring that, does anyone who is familiar with the perl bindings think
that I can basically s/svn_wc_status_t/svn_wc_status2_t/?  It appears
that v2 has all the original members plus some so maybe all the calls
to the old structures will work still?  Unfortunately I do not know
much about swig.

Thanks for any help,
Troy

-- 
"Beware of spyware. If you can, use the Firefox browser." - USA Today
Download now at http://getfirefox.com
Registered Linux User #354814 ( http://counter.li.org/)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Perl Repository Lock support

Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On 9/13/06, Troy Curtis Jr <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone created a patch for the perl bindings that support
> repository locking?

Not sure.

> Barring that, does anyone who is familiar with the perl bindings think
> that I can basically s/svn_wc_status_t/svn_wc_status2_t/?  It appears
> that v2 has all the original members plus some so maybe all the calls
> to the old structures will work still?  Unfortunately I do not know
> much about swig.

That seems like a reasonable approach to take.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Perl Repository Lock support

Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On 9/13/06, Troy Curtis Jr <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone created a patch for the perl bindings that support
> repository locking?

Not sure.

> Barring that, does anyone who is familiar with the perl bindings think
> that I can basically s/svn_wc_status_t/svn_wc_status2_t/?  It appears
> that v2 has all the original members plus some so maybe all the calls
> to the old structures will work still?  Unfortunately I do not know
> much about swig.

That seems like a reasonable approach to take.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org