[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-3476) Travel sample fullapp and fullapp-domain launchers use different contributions

["Simon Laws (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12838312#action_12838312 ] 

Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3476:
-------------------------------------

I expect they're different historically just because the domain launcher was created at a point that that was the set of launchers being used. Subsequently the fullapp laucher was changed to bring in a different implementation type and to show policy in action. I think the real answer is that they should be the same (however it is interesting the see the pluggability of contributions in action) 

> Travel sample fullapp and fullapp-domain launchers use different contributions
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-3476
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3476
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java SCA Travel Sample
>            Reporter: Simon Nash
>
> The travel sample fullapp launcher uses a different set of contributions from the fullapp-domain (distributed) launcher.
> In fullapp, the payment-spring-policy and creditcard-payment-jaxb-policy contributions are used.
> In fullapp-domain, the payment-java and creditcard-payment-jaxb contributions are used.
> Presumably the contributions in fullapp are correct and therefore fullapp-domain should be changed to use the same contributions.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.