You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airavata.apache.org by Chathuri Wimalasena <ka...@gmail.com> on 2014/08/21 17:39:41 UTC
Removing previous registry API usage from airavata components
Hi Devs,
I'm planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2) usage from
airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on previous
registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or concerns.
Thanks..
Chathuri
Re: Removing previous registry API usage from airavata components
Posted by Chathuri Wimalasena <ka...@gmail.com>.
I think I removed all the places where we use AiravataRegistry2 in airavata
code base. If you see any issues, please let me know. I built with a clean
repo and ran some applications without any issues. Let me know if you face
any issues.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Saminda Wijeratne <sa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Great. Then RIP AiravataRegistry2, Fair-well!!!
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena <kamalasini@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Yes I did update app catalog to support workflows.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <gl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Saminda Wijeratne <sa...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> I gather you've updated the app catalog to support workflows right?
>>>>
>>> I haven't touched app-catalog or workflows.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Lahiru
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <glahiru@gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena <
>>>>> kamalasini@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Lahiru,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have another question regarding GFac. We have two classes called
>>>>>> GFacImpl and BetterGFacImpl. Why are we using the both ? Is it ok if I
>>>>>> change all the places that uses GFacImpl to use BetterGFacImpl ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> + 1, great idea and thanks for volunteering Chathuri.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But did we get GFac away from using it yet?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 21, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Chathuri Wimalasena <
>>>>>>> kamalasini@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > Hi Devs,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I'm planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2)
>>>>>>> usage from airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on
>>>>>>> previous registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or
>>>>>>> concerns.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Thanks..
>>>>>>> > Chathuri
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> System Analyst Programmer
>>>>> PTI Lab
>>>>> Indiana University
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> System Analyst Programmer
>>> PTI Lab
>>> Indiana University
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Removing previous registry API usage from airavata components
Posted by Saminda Wijeratne <sa...@gmail.com>.
Great. Then RIP AiravataRegistry2, Fair-well!!!
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena <ka...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes I did update app catalog to support workflows.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <gl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Saminda Wijeratne <sa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I gather you've updated the app catalog to support workflows right?
>>>
>> I haven't touched app-catalog or workflows.
>>
>> Regards
>> Lahiru
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <gl...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena <
>>>> kamalasini@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Lahiru,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have another question regarding GFac. We have two classes called
>>>>> GFacImpl and BetterGFacImpl. Why are we using the both ? Is it ok if I
>>>>> change all the places that uses GFacImpl to use BetterGFacImpl ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> + 1, great idea and thanks for volunteering Chathuri.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But did we get GFac away from using it yet?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 21, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Chathuri Wimalasena <
>>>>>> kamalasini@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Hi Devs,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I'm planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2)
>>>>>> usage from airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on
>>>>>> previous registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or
>>>>>> concerns.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks..
>>>>>> > Chathuri
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> System Analyst Programmer
>>>> PTI Lab
>>>> Indiana University
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> System Analyst Programmer
>> PTI Lab
>> Indiana University
>>
>
>
Re: Removing previous registry API usage from airavata components
Posted by Chathuri Wimalasena <ka...@gmail.com>.
Yes I did update app catalog to support workflows.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <gl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Saminda Wijeratne <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I gather you've updated the app catalog to support workflows right?
>>
> I haven't touched app-catalog or workflows.
>
> Regards
> Lahiru
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <gl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena <
>>> kamalasini@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Lahiru,
>>>>
>>>> I have another question regarding GFac. We have two classes called
>>>> GFacImpl and BetterGFacImpl. Why are we using the both ? Is it ok if I
>>>> change all the places that uses GFacImpl to use BetterGFacImpl ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> + 1, great idea and thanks for volunteering Chathuri.
>>>>>
>>>>> But did we get GFac away from using it yet?
>>>>>
>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 21, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Chathuri Wimalasena <
>>>>> kamalasini@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Hi Devs,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I'm planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2)
>>>>> usage from airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on
>>>>> previous registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or
>>>>> concerns.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks..
>>>>> > Chathuri
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> System Analyst Programmer
>>> PTI Lab
>>> Indiana University
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> System Analyst Programmer
> PTI Lab
> Indiana University
>
Re: Removing previous registry API usage from airavata components
Posted by Lahiru Gunathilake <gl...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Saminda Wijeratne <sa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> I gather you've updated the app catalog to support workflows right?
>
I haven't touched app-catalog or workflows.
Regards
Lahiru
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <gl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena <
>> kamalasini@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Lahiru,
>>>
>>> I have another question regarding GFac. We have two classes called
>>> GFacImpl and BetterGFacImpl. Why are we using the both ? Is it ok if I
>>> change all the places that uses GFacImpl to use BetterGFacImpl ?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> + 1, great idea and thanks for volunteering Chathuri.
>>>>
>>>> But did we get GFac away from using it yet?
>>>>
>>>> Suresh
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 21, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Chathuri Wimalasena <ka...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi Devs,
>>>> >
>>>> > I'm planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2)
>>>> usage from airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on
>>>> previous registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or
>>>> concerns.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks..
>>>> > Chathuri
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> System Analyst Programmer
>> PTI Lab
>> Indiana University
>>
>
>
--
System Analyst Programmer
PTI Lab
Indiana University
Re: Removing previous registry API usage from airavata components
Posted by Saminda Wijeratne <sa...@gmail.com>.
+1
I gather you've updated the app catalog to support workflows right?
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <gl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena <
> kamalasini@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lahiru,
>>
>> I have another question regarding GFac. We have two classes called
>> GFacImpl and BetterGFacImpl. Why are we using the both ? Is it ok if I
>> change all the places that uses GFacImpl to use BetterGFacImpl ?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> + 1, great idea and thanks for volunteering Chathuri.
>>>
>>> But did we get GFac away from using it yet?
>>>
>>> Suresh
>>>
>>> On Aug 21, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Chathuri Wimalasena <ka...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Devs,
>>> >
>>> > I'm planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2) usage
>>> from airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on previous
>>> registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or concerns.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks..
>>> > Chathuri
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> System Analyst Programmer
> PTI Lab
> Indiana University
>
Re: Removing previous registry API usage from airavata components
Posted by Lahiru Gunathilake <gl...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena <ka...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Lahiru,
>
> I have another question regarding GFac. We have two classes called
> GFacImpl and BetterGFacImpl. Why are we using the both ? Is it ok if I
> change all the places that uses GFacImpl to use BetterGFacImpl ?
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> + 1, great idea and thanks for volunteering Chathuri.
>>
>> But did we get GFac away from using it yet?
>>
>> Suresh
>>
>> On Aug 21, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Chathuri Wimalasena <ka...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Devs,
>> >
>> > I'm planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2) usage
>> from airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on previous
>> registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or concerns.
>> >
>> > Thanks..
>> > Chathuri
>>
>>
>
--
System Analyst Programmer
PTI Lab
Indiana University
Re: Removing previous registry API usage from airavata components
Posted by Chathuri Wimalasena <ka...@gmail.com>.
Hi Lahiru,
I have another question regarding GFac. We have two classes called GFacImpl
and BetterGFacImpl. Why are we using the both ? Is it ok if I change all
the places that uses GFacImpl to use BetterGFacImpl ?
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> + 1, great idea and thanks for volunteering Chathuri.
>
> But did we get GFac away from using it yet?
>
> Suresh
>
> On Aug 21, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Chathuri Wimalasena <ka...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> > I'm planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2) usage
> from airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on previous
> registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or concerns.
> >
> > Thanks..
> > Chathuri
>
>
Re: Removing previous registry API usage from airavata components
Posted by Lahiru Gunathilake <gl...@gmail.com>.
Hi Chathuri,
I was about to start it. Yes we are not using it even though we use the old
GFac schemas we do not use registry.
Thank you for volunteering for this.
Lahiru
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> + 1, great idea and thanks for volunteering Chathuri.
>
> But did we get GFac away from using it yet?
>
> Suresh
>
> On Aug 21, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Chathuri Wimalasena <ka...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> > I'm planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2) usage
> from airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on previous
> registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or concerns.
> >
> > Thanks..
> > Chathuri
>
>
--
System Analyst Programmer
PTI Lab
Indiana University
Re: Removing previous registry API usage from airavata components
Posted by Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>.
+ 1, great idea and thanks for volunteering Chathuri.
But did we get GFac away from using it yet?
Suresh
On Aug 21, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Chathuri Wimalasena <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> I'm planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2) usage from airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on previous registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or concerns.
>
> Thanks..
> Chathuri