You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Brian Behlendorf <br...@organic.com> on 1995/10/18 07:28:21 UTC
Re: LICENSE
On Thu, 21 Sep 1995, Roy Fielding wrote:
> >BTW, any chance of getting the NeXT people to pay the expenses that
> >Brian mentioned the other day ?.. it's peanuts to them and will show
> >a sign of good-will.
>
> Yes! I had the exact same thought while riding the elevator down
> for another can of Dr. Pepper (it's been a looong week). Maybe
> Cliff or Brian (when he gets back) can wander over and ask them
> for help in setting up a non-profit organization -- it's tax-deductible
> and incredibly good PR.
(following up on old email)
I've seen a couple other companies express interest in helping fund the
project, if only to ensure that it remains a stable and featureful
server. My response has generally been that companies that want to
dedicate resources should dedicate engineering time to the apache
developers' list instead.
The "expenses" related to maintaining the Apache list are minimal - the
$50/year associated with the domain name, the bandwidth and CPU
associated with distributing this list and the server itself, are about
it. That's not even worth itemizing. The only thing I'd like to have
that we don't right now is some sort of cross-platform testing
suite/hardware setup, so patches can be tested simultaneously on a bevy
of platforms and configurations... but I think we could emulate that if
we wanted and were organized enough. I also don't think, even with
donations, a programmer could be hired and paid to work 100% on Apache
code. So, I guess I really don't see the point in trying to accept money
when we don't have a coherent use to put it to. Instead, companies
should be encouraged to donate engineer time and resources like just
about everyone here has.
Brian
--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/