Processing Changes found in SCM

[D D <da...@gmail.com>]

Hello,

I'm running into an issue where a project that carries a very large number
of static website files takes too long to deploy. Does anyone know of a
mechanism in Maven that would allow me to check out through scm plugin only
changed files?

Personally I'm opposed to deploying only changed files but higher powers
dictate this solution to me. I would rather use Maven than write a shell
script to handle this special case.

Thanks in advance,
Dave

Re: Processing Changes found in SCM

[Ron Wheeler <rw...@artifact-software.com>]

On 09/07/2010 1:58 AM, D D wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running into an issue where a project that carries a very large number
> of static website files takes too long to deploy. Does anyone know of a
> mechanism in Maven that would allow me to check out through scm plugin only
> changed files?
>
> Personally I'm opposed to deploying only changed files but higher powers
> dictate this solution to me. I would rather use Maven than write a shell
> script to handle this special case.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Dave
>
>    
Another alternative would be to break the project up into smaller units 
that could be deployed separately.

Ron

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org

Re: Processing Changes found in SCM

[Anders Hammar <an...@hammar.net>]

Maybe the update goal of the maven-scm-plugin?
http://maven.apache.org/scm/plugins/update-mojo.html

/Anders

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 07:58, D D <da...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm running into an issue where a project that carries a very large number
> of static website files takes too long to deploy. Does anyone know of a
> mechanism in Maven that would allow me to check out through scm plugin only
> changed files?
>
> Personally I'm opposed to deploying only changed files but higher powers
> dictate this solution to me. I would rather use Maven than write a shell
> script to handle this special case.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Dave
>