You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com> on 2006/04/11 14:57:39 UTC
m2 conversion : rmi-naming configuration
Hi,
The rmi-naming configuration has a long list of dependencies. It
includes almost all the specs. All the GBeans in the configuration
belong to o.a.g.system.* and use o.a.g.naming.* classes. Are these
coming from the org.openejb.corba.* classes used via system properties
listed below?
<gbean name="SystemProperties"
class="org.apache.geronimo.system.properties.SystemProperties">
<attribute name="systemProperties">
javax.rmi.CORBA.UtilClass=org.openejb.corba.util.UtilDelegateImpl
org.openejb.corba.UtilDelegateClass=com.sun.corba.se.internal.POA.ShutdownUtilDelegate
org.omg.CORBA.ORBSingletonClass=com.sun.corba.se.internal.corba.ORBSingleton
org.omg.CORBA.ORBClass=org.openejb.corba.sunorb.OpenEJBORB
javax.rmi.CORBA.PortableRemoteObjectClass=com.sun.corba.se.internal.javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject
javax.net.ssl.keyStorePassword=secret
javax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword=secret
</attribute>
...........................
Thanks
Anita
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: m2 conversion : rmi-naming configuration
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 4/11/06, anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I wish it was a separate package, i.e. had its own jar...
It is. It's not yet M2-ized, but it's at
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/openejb/openejb-core/.
> Anita
Jacek
---
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
Re: m2 conversion : rmi-naming configuration
Posted by anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
I wish it was a separate package, i.e. had its own jar...
Thanks
Anita
--- Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl> wrote:
> On 4/11/06, anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > The rmi-naming configuration has a long list of dependencies.
> It
> > includes almost all the specs. All the GBeans in the configuration
> > belong to o.a.g.system.* and use o.a.g.naming.* classes. Are these
> > coming from the org.openejb.corba.* classes used via system
> properties
> > listed below?
>
> Possibly. See the following:
>
> $ svn info openejb
> Path: openejb
> URL: https://svn.codehaus.org/openejb/trunk/openejb2
> Repository UUID: 2b0c1533-c60b-0410-b8bd-89f67432e5c6
> Revision: 2597
> Node Kind: directory
> Schedule: normal
> Last Changed Author: hogstrom
> Last Changed Rev: 2587
> Last Changed Date: 2006-03-28 23:22:20 +0200 (Tue, 28 Mar 2006)
> Properties Last Updated: 2006-02-04 23:29:21 +0100 (Sat, 04 Feb 2006)
>
>
> jlaskowski@JLASKOWSKI /cygdrive/c/oss/geronimo
> $ grep \<dependency\> openejb/modules/openejb-core/project.xml |wc -l
> 56
>
> 56 - pretty large! I'm certain we could lower their number by a half.
>
> > Anita
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek
> ---------------------
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.laskowski.net.pl
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: m2 conversion : rmi-naming configuration
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 4/11/06, anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> The rmi-naming configuration has a long list of dependencies. It
> includes almost all the specs. All the GBeans in the configuration
> belong to o.a.g.system.* and use o.a.g.naming.* classes. Are these
> coming from the org.openejb.corba.* classes used via system properties
> listed below?
Possibly. See the following:
$ svn info openejb
Path: openejb
URL: https://svn.codehaus.org/openejb/trunk/openejb2
Repository UUID: 2b0c1533-c60b-0410-b8bd-89f67432e5c6
Revision: 2597
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: hogstrom
Last Changed Rev: 2587
Last Changed Date: 2006-03-28 23:22:20 +0200 (Tue, 28 Mar 2006)
Properties Last Updated: 2006-02-04 23:29:21 +0100 (Sat, 04 Feb 2006)
jlaskowski@JLASKOWSKI /cygdrive/c/oss/geronimo
$ grep \<dependency\> openejb/modules/openejb-core/project.xml |wc -l
56
56 - pretty large! I'm certain we could lower their number by a half.
> Anita
Jacek
--
Jacek
---------------------
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
Re: m2 conversion : rmi-naming configuration
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 4/12/06, anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Jacek, Thanks!
Huh? I have done nothing yet aside from asking which wasn't that hard,
believe me ;)
> I have decided to wait for 1.1 merge. Please ignore
> the patches submitted for the packaging plugin. They will have have to
> be redone after the merge.
Please add the comment to the jira entry so I won't forget about it
and apply it accidentaly.
> Anita
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.org.pl
Re: m2 conversion : rmi-naming configuration
Posted by anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
--- Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl> wrote:
> On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> > In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
> > SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
>
> Hi Dain,
>
> Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with trunk,
> should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at
> j2ee-corba
> plan and commit these changes to trunk?
Jacek, Thanks! I have decided to wait for 1.1 merge. Please ignore
the patches submitted for the packaging plugin. They will have have to
be redone after the merge.
Thanks
Anita
>
> > -dain
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.laskowski.org.pl
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: m2 conversion : configurations
Posted by anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
Comments inline..
--- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2006, at 9:00 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>
> > David,
> > Thanks! More comments inline..
> >
> > --- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Apr 19, 2006, at 6:51 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks. What criteria has been used to set the
> >> geronimo.dependency
> >>> property in project.xml? The packaging of most configurations
> >> assumes
> >>> the packaged configuration will be loaded on top of j2ee-system
> >>> configuration. But the 'applications' configurations implicitly
> >> assume
> >>> that a full server, i.e jetty/tomcat is running. Is this correct?
> >>
> >> yes.
> >>> If
> >>> yes, Should we add these configurations (specified by
> >>> deploymnetConfig)
> >>> to the plans for documentation?
> >> no
> >>> Is this information stored in
> >>> config.ser and the deployer makes sure that these are already
> >> loaded?
> >> yes. The secret is in the defaultEnvironment attributes of the
> >> various builders, which add the necessary parents for each type of
> >> j2ee artifact. For instance the jetty builder adds jetty,
> connector
> >>
> >> builder adds connector, etc etc.
> > Ideally , if a user wanted to package a car for a simple
> > application like jsp-examples, he/she should not be required to
> know
> > all about the internal configuraitons? The user should be able to
> > include a single car as a dependency in pom.xml/project.xml for
> > standard servers like j2ee-*-server, web-jms-tomcat-server(?) etc.
>
> For simple apps the user should not have to include any explicit
> dependencies/imports at all: the deployers should figure out what is
>
> needed and add it for them. This is what the defaultEnvironment/
> defaultParentId is for, and as far as I know it works well.
Ah... I remember defaultParentId from TomcatModuleBuilder, it works
fine.
Do you
> know of any problems with this?
You are correct. I just tested that all the dependencies on
various cars are not needed in the project.xml. Should they be removed?
I hope nobody uses it as a sample. They will not be needed in M2
anyway.
One minor problem I haven't had time
>
> to fix is that the axis/ws dependencies are added to all web and ejb
>
> apps whether or not they are needed: they should be added by the web
>
> services builder, but there is currently no way to do this.
yep, it would be nice to have this in future..
Thanks
Anita
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > Anita
> >
> > You can suppress these defaults in
> >>
> >> case you have special requirements by using the
> >> suppressDefaultEnvironment element in environment.
> >>
> >> In 1.0/1.2 this is not as well developed or consistent as in 1.1:
> the
> >>
> >> builders have attributes defaultParentId.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> david jencks
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Anita
> >>> --- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Apr 17, 2006, at 6:45 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> David,
> >>>>> Thanks! How is j2ee-system configuration started now?
> >>>>
> >>>> j2ee-system is the "root" configuration of the main geronimo
> >> server,
> >>>>
> >>>> and the config.ser file is actually in server.jar. The Daemon
> >>>> locates it in the classpath and starts it, see line 251.
> >>>
> >>> The naming is slightly confusing. The server.jar contains
> >>> j2ee-system configuraion and not j2ee-server.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks
> >>>> david jencks
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> Anita
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
> >>>>>>> configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think calling the server side security config j2ee-security
> >>>> might
> >>>>>> be misleading; perhaps we should call it server-security. In
> >> any
> >>>>>> case, it doesn't need anything from j2ee-server, so it doesn't
> >>>> import
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> thanks
> >>>>>> david jencks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>> Anita
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --- Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
> >>>>>>>>>> SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Dain,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with
> >>>>>> trunk,
> >>>>>>>>> should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at
> >>>>>>>> j2ee-corba
> >>>>>>>>> plan and commit these changes to trunk?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> sure
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -dain
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
> around
> >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: m2 conversion : configurations
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Apr 19, 2006, at 9:00 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> David,
> Thanks! More comments inline..
>
> --- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2006, at 6:51 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks. What criteria has been used to set the
>> geronimo.dependency
>>> property in project.xml? The packaging of most configurations
>> assumes
>>> the packaged configuration will be loaded on top of j2ee-system
>>> configuration. But the 'applications' configurations implicitly
>> assume
>>> that a full server, i.e jetty/tomcat is running. Is this correct?
>>
>> yes.
>>> If
>>> yes, Should we add these configurations (specified by
>>> deploymnetConfig)
>>> to the plans for documentation?
>> no
>>> Is this information stored in
>>> config.ser and the deployer makes sure that these are already
>> loaded?
>> yes. The secret is in the defaultEnvironment attributes of the
>> various builders, which add the necessary parents for each type of
>> j2ee artifact. For instance the jetty builder adds jetty, connector
>>
>> builder adds connector, etc etc.
> Ideally , if a user wanted to package a car for a simple
> application like jsp-examples, he/she should not be required to know
> all about the internal configuraitons? The user should be able to
> include a single car as a dependency in pom.xml/project.xml for
> standard servers like j2ee-*-server, web-jms-tomcat-server(?) etc.
For simple apps the user should not have to include any explicit
dependencies/imports at all: the deployers should figure out what is
needed and add it for them. This is what the defaultEnvironment/
defaultParentId is for, and as far as I know it works well. Do you
know of any problems with this? One minor problem I haven't had time
to fix is that the axis/ws dependencies are added to all web and ejb
apps whether or not they are needed: they should be added by the web
services builder, but there is currently no way to do this.
thanks
david jencks
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
> You can suppress these defaults in
>>
>> case you have special requirements by using the
>> suppressDefaultEnvironment element in environment.
>>
>> In 1.0/1.2 this is not as well developed or consistent as in 1.1: the
>>
>> builders have attributes defaultParentId.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Anita
>>> --- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 17, 2006, at 6:45 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> David,
>>>>> Thanks! How is j2ee-system configuration started now?
>>>>
>>>> j2ee-system is the "root" configuration of the main geronimo
>> server,
>>>>
>>>> and the config.ser file is actually in server.jar. The Daemon
>>>> locates it in the classpath and starts it, see line 251.
>>>
>>> The naming is slightly confusing. The server.jar contains
>>> j2ee-system configuraion and not j2ee-server.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Anita
>>>>>
>>>>> --- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
>>>>>>> configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think calling the server side security config j2ee-security
>>>> might
>>>>>> be misleading; perhaps we should call it server-security. In
>> any
>>>>>> case, it doesn't need anything from j2ee-server, so it doesn't
>>>> import
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>> david jencks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Anita
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
>>>>>>>>>> SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Dain,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with
>>>>>> trunk,
>>>>>>>>> should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at
>>>>>>>> j2ee-corba
>>>>>>>>> plan and commit these changes to trunk?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -dain
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: m2 conversion : configurations
Posted by anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
David,
Thanks! More comments inline..
--- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2006, at 6:51 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>
> > Thanks. What criteria has been used to set the
> geronimo.dependency
> > property in project.xml? The packaging of most configurations
> assumes
> > the packaged configuration will be loaded on top of j2ee-system
> > configuration. But the 'applications' configurations implicitly
> assume
> > that a full server, i.e jetty/tomcat is running. Is this correct?
>
> yes.
> > If
> > yes, Should we add these configurations (specified by
> > deploymnetConfig)
> > to the plans for documentation?
> no
> > Is this information stored in
> > config.ser and the deployer makes sure that these are already
> loaded?
> yes. The secret is in the defaultEnvironment attributes of the
> various builders, which add the necessary parents for each type of
> j2ee artifact. For instance the jetty builder adds jetty, connector
>
> builder adds connector, etc etc.
Ideally , if a user wanted to package a car for a simple
application like jsp-examples, he/she should not be required to know
all about the internal configuraitons? The user should be able to
include a single car as a dependency in pom.xml/project.xml for
standard servers like j2ee-*-server, web-jms-tomcat-server(?) etc.
Thanks
Anita
You can suppress these defaults in
>
> case you have special requirements by using the
> suppressDefaultEnvironment element in environment.
>
> In 1.0/1.2 this is not as well developed or consistent as in 1.1: the
>
> builders have attributes defaultParentId.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > Anita
> > --- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Apr 17, 2006, at 6:45 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> >>
> >>> David,
> >>> Thanks! How is j2ee-system configuration started now?
> >>
> >> j2ee-system is the "root" configuration of the main geronimo
> server,
> >>
> >> and the config.ser file is actually in server.jar. The Daemon
> >> locates it in the classpath and starts it, see line 251.
> >
> > The naming is slightly confusing. The server.jar contains
> > j2ee-system configuraion and not j2ee-server.
> >
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> david jencks
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Anita
> >>>
> >>> --- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
> >>>>> configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
> >>>>
> >>>> I think calling the server side security config j2ee-security
> >> might
> >>>> be misleading; perhaps we should call it server-security. In
> any
> >>>> case, it doesn't need anything from j2ee-server, so it doesn't
> >> import
> >>>>
> >>>> it.
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks
> >>>> david jencks
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> Anita
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --- Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
> >>>>>>>> SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Dain,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with
> >>>> trunk,
> >>>>>>> should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at
> >>>>>> j2ee-corba
> >>>>>>> plan and commit these changes to trunk?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> sure
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -dain
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: m2 conversion : configurations
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Apr 19, 2006, at 6:51 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> Thanks. What criteria has been used to set the geronimo.dependency
> property in project.xml? The packaging of most configurations assumes
> the packaged configuration will be loaded on top of j2ee-system
> configuration. But the 'applications' configurations implicitly assume
> that a full server, i.e jetty/tomcat is running. Is this correct?
yes.
> If
> yes, Should we add these configurations (specified by
> deploymnetConfig)
> to the plans for documentation?
no
> Is this information stored in
> config.ser and the deployer makes sure that these are already loaded?
yes. The secret is in the defaultEnvironment attributes of the
various builders, which add the necessary parents for each type of
j2ee artifact. For instance the jetty builder adds jetty, connector
builder adds connector, etc etc. You can suppress these defaults in
case you have special requirements by using the
suppressDefaultEnvironment element in environment.
In 1.0/1.2 this is not as well developed or consistent as in 1.1: the
builders have attributes defaultParentId.
thanks
david jencks
>
> Thanks
> Anita
> --- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2006, at 6:45 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>>
>>> David,
>>> Thanks! How is j2ee-system configuration started now?
>>
>> j2ee-system is the "root" configuration of the main geronimo server,
>>
>> and the config.ser file is actually in server.jar. The Daemon
>> locates it in the classpath and starts it, see line 251.
>
> The naming is slightly confusing. The server.jar contains
> j2ee-system configuraion and not j2ee-server.
>
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Anita
>>>
>>> --- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
>>>>> configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
>>>>
>>>> I think calling the server side security config j2ee-security
>> might
>>>> be misleading; perhaps we should call it server-security. In any
>>>> case, it doesn't need anything from j2ee-server, so it doesn't
>> import
>>>>
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Anita
>>>>>
>>>>> --- Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
>>>>>>>> SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Dain,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with
>>>> trunk,
>>>>>>> should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at
>>>>>> j2ee-corba
>>>>>>> plan and commit these changes to trunk?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -dain
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: m2 conversion : configurations
Posted by anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
Thanks. What criteria has been used to set the geronimo.dependency
property in project.xml? The packaging of most configurations assumes
the packaged configuration will be loaded on top of j2ee-system
configuration. But the 'applications' configurations implicitly assume
that a full server, i.e jetty/tomcat is running. Is this correct? If
yes, Should we add these configurations (specified by deploymnetConfig)
to the plans for documentation? Is this information stored in
config.ser and the deployer makes sure that these are already loaded?
Thanks
Anita
--- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2006, at 6:45 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>
> > David,
> > Thanks! How is j2ee-system configuration started now?
>
> j2ee-system is the "root" configuration of the main geronimo server,
>
> and the config.ser file is actually in server.jar. The Daemon
> locates it in the classpath and starts it, see line 251.
The naming is slightly confusing. The server.jar contains
j2ee-system configuraion and not j2ee-server.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > Anita
> >
> > --- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> >>
> >>> The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
> >>> configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
> >>
> >> I think calling the server side security config j2ee-security
> might
> >> be misleading; perhaps we should call it server-security. In any
> >> case, it doesn't need anything from j2ee-server, so it doesn't
> import
> >>
> >> it.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> david jencks
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Anita
> >>>
> >>> --- Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
> >>>>>> SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Dain,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with
> >> trunk,
> >>>>> should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at
> >>>> j2ee-corba
> >>>>> plan and commit these changes to trunk?
> >>>>
> >>>> sure
> >>>>
> >>>> -dain
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> Do You Yahoo!?
> >>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: m2 conversion : configurations
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Apr 17, 2006, at 6:45 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> David,
> Thanks! How is j2ee-system configuration started now?
j2ee-system is the "root" configuration of the main geronimo server,
and the config.ser file is actually in server.jar. The Daemon
locates it in the classpath and starts it, see line 251.
thanks
david jencks
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
> --- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>>
>>> The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
>>> configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
>>
>> I think calling the server side security config j2ee-security might
>> be misleading; perhaps we should call it server-security. In any
>> case, it doesn't need anything from j2ee-server, so it doesn't import
>>
>> it.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Anita
>>>
>>> --- Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>>>>>> In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
>>>>>> SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Dain,
>>>>>
>>>>> Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with
>> trunk,
>>>>> should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at
>>>> j2ee-corba
>>>>> plan and commit these changes to trunk?
>>>>
>>>> sure
>>>>
>>>> -dain
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: m2 conversion : configurations
Posted by anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
David,
Thanks! How is j2ee-system configuration started now?
Thanks
Anita
--- David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>
> > The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
> > configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
>
> I think calling the server side security config j2ee-security might
> be misleading; perhaps we should call it server-security. In any
> case, it doesn't need anything from j2ee-server, so it doesn't import
>
> it.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > Anita
> >
> > --- Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> >>>> In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
> >>>> SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
> >>>
> >>> Hi Dain,
> >>>
> >>> Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with
> trunk,
> >>> should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at
> >> j2ee-corba
> >>> plan and commit these changes to trunk?
> >>
> >> sure
> >>
> >> -dain
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: m2 conversion : configurations
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
> configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
I think calling the server side security config j2ee-security might
be misleading; perhaps we should call it server-security. In any
case, it doesn't need anything from j2ee-server, so it doesn't import
it.
thanks
david jencks
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
> --- Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>
>> On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>>>> In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
>>>> SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
>>>
>>> Hi Dain,
>>>
>>> Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with trunk,
>>> should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at
>> j2ee-corba
>>> plan and commit these changes to trunk?
>>
>> sure
>>
>> -dain
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: m2 conversion : configurations
Posted by anita kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
Thanks
Anita
--- Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>
> > On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> >> In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
> >> SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
> >
> > Hi Dain,
> >
> > Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with trunk,
> > should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at
> j2ee-corba
> > plan and commit these changes to trunk?
>
> sure
>
> -dain
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: m2 conversion : rmi-naming configuration
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
>> In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
>> SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
>
> Hi Dain,
>
> Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with trunk,
> should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at j2ee-corba
> plan and commit these changes to trunk?
sure
-dain
Re: m2 conversion : rmi-naming configuration
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
> SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
Hi Dain,
Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with trunk,
should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at j2ee-corba
plan and commit these changes to trunk?
> -dain
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.org.pl
Re: m2 conversion : rmi-naming configuration
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
-dain
On Apr 11, 2006, at 5:57 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> Hi,
> The rmi-naming configuration has a long list of dependencies. It
> includes almost all the specs. All the GBeans in the configuration
> belong to o.a.g.system.* and use o.a.g.naming.* classes. Are these
> coming from the org.openejb.corba.* classes used via system
> properties
> listed below?
>
> <gbean name="SystemProperties"
> class="org.apache.geronimo.system.properties.SystemProperties">
> <attribute name="systemProperties">
>
> javax.rmi.CORBA.UtilClass=org.openejb.corba.util.UtilDelegateImpl
>
> org.openejb.corba.UtilDelegateClass=com.sun.corba.se.internal.POA.Shut
> downUtilDelegate
>
> org.omg.CORBA.ORBSingletonClass=com.sun.corba.se.internal.corba.ORBSin
> gleton
> org.omg.CORBA.ORBClass=org.openejb.corba.sunorb.OpenEJBORB
>
> javax.rmi.CORBA.PortableRemoteObjectClass=com.sun.corba.se.internal.ja
> vax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject
> javax.net.ssl.keyStorePassword=secret
> javax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword=secret
> </attribute>
> ...........................
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com