Re: [DISCUSS] Planning for 0.9.1 Release

[larry mccay <lm...@apache.org>]

All -

Just an FYI - I committed the final outstanding patch last night for the
0.9.1 release and am in the process of building the first rc for testing.

I will send an email announcing its availability for testing and a VOTE
once it is staged and ready to go.

thanks,

--larry

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 8:56 AM, larry mccay <la...@gmail.com> wrote:

> All -
>
> As we are closing done on 11 or so days to our target release, I thought
> it would be good to provide a status.
>
> We have addressed a few JIRAs that have been targeted for 0.9.1 and still
> have a handful to tackle.
>
> KNOX-711 has a patch available for review and I will be taking some time
> to review and test it. This is a fundamental change to how rewrite fuels
> are applied to services and therefore does require review in order to be
> committed.
>
> At the moment, we have the following open JIRAs:
>
>
>    1. [image: Bug] KNOX-705
>    Views in Ambari UI don't render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705>
>    2. [image: Bug] KNOX-711
>    Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711>
>    3. [image: Bug] KNOX-714
>    Remove Permissive MIT License from NOTICE File
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-714>
>    4. [image: Bug] KNOX-715
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-715>submitJava should
>    allow multiple argument via arg()
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-715>
>
>
> I am in the process of reviewing and testing KNOX-715 and hope to commit
> it today or early this week.
> KNOX-714 is a no brainer to just clean up the NOTICE file.
>
> Also at this point, we have the following list as the total bug fixes for
> 0.9.1:
>
>
>    1. [image: Bug] KNOX-705
>    Views in Ambari UI don't render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705>
>    2. [image: Bug] KNOX-711
>    Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711>
>    3. [image: Bug] KNOX-712
>    submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg()
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712>
>    4. [image: Bug] KNOX-713
>    Knox Shell HDFS.get.Request is Package Private
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-713>
>    5. [image: Bug] KNOX-714
>    Remove Permissive MIT License from NOTICE File
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-714>
>    6. [image: Bug] KNOX-715
>    submitJava should allow multiple argument via arg()
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-715>
>    7. [image: Bug] KNOX-716
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-716>Parameter setting for
>    'replayBufferSize' is no longer representing KBytes.
>    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-716>
>
>
> If there are any other issues that you feel need to be addressed please
> raise this as a discussion point so that we can plan accordingly.
>
> As we close down on this release, we should also start thinking about the
> 0.10.0 (perhaps a 1.0 candidate?) release and what would be required.
>
> thanks,
>
> --larry
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Minder <ke...@oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 on a bug fix 0.9.1 release targeted around June 10th.
>> I agree that it should be tightly scoped and the current candidate list
>> seems like a good starting point.
>>
>> +1 on Larry as the release manager for 0.9.1 also.
>>
>> > On May 12, 2016, at 3:38 PM, larry mccay <lm...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Let's see what Kevin has in mind...
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM, larry mccay <la...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Sounds good, Sumit!
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Sumit Gupta <
>> sumit.gupta@hortonworks.com
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Thanks for initiating the discussion Larry. +1 for you to be the
>> release
>> >>> manager and the date looks good to me as well. I agree that this
>> should be
>> >>> a bug fix release that is tightly scoped. I can¹t think of any other
>> bugs
>> >>> at this time that should be added to the list (other than some docs
>> >>> updates that I¹ll file Jiras for), but if I find any candidates I¹ll
>> reply
>> >>> to this thread.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sumit.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 5/12/16, 11:43 AM, "larry mccay" <lm...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> All -
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I believe that we need to start collecting and/or filing the JIRAs
>> that
>> >>> we
>> >>>> need for a 0.9.1 release. There were a handful of things in 0.9.0
>> that we
>> >>>> were aware of at release time that need to have quick follow up
>> fixes.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Currently, we have the following three JIRAs:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>  1. [image: Bug] KNOX-712
>> >>>>  submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg()
>> >>>>  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712>
>> >>>>  2. [image: Bug] KNOX-711
>> >>>>  Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic
>> >>>>  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711>
>> >>>>  3. [image: Bug] KNOX-705
>> >>>>  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705>Views in Ambari UI
>> >>>> don't
>> >>>>  render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service
>> >>>>  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I have a couple things in mind to file for the KnoxSSO default IDP
>> form
>> >>>> and
>> >>>> will file those shortly.
>> >>>> My feeling is that 0.9.1 should be a bug fix release and scoped as
>> >>> tightly
>> >>>> as possible.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> New features should target 0.10.0.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'd like to volunteer as release manager for 0.9.1 and propose a
>> target
>> >>>> release date of 6/10th.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thoughts?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --larry
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>>
>