You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jakarta.apache.org by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> on 2010/04/22 17:29:02 UTC
Gump nags
Hi all,
Gump nag mails need to be adjusted so they go to the new list(s) rather
than get re-routed. Do people prefer to have the nag mails go to the
notifications@ list or to dev@?
Stefan
Re: Gump nags
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2010-04-22, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>
>>> Gump nag mails need to be adjusted so they go to the new list(s) rather
>>> than get re-routed. Do people prefer to have the nag mails go to the
>>> notifications@ list or to dev@?
>
>> Per design, all automated messages should go to notifications@ -- that
>> would include JIRA (already done), SVN commit messages (already done,
>> though may need moderation for each committers first commit), Bugzilla
>> and Gump.
>
> I thought so - and have already changed the Gump descriptors to reflect
> this. As I discovered I am a moderator for both lists so can help with
> moderating through. 8-)
>
<snip/>
Cool, thanks for updating the descriptors and thanks in advance for
the help with moderation.
As a reminder, the progress is being tracked here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2335
Please add a comment indicating you've updated the Gump descriptors. I
can add the comment too, but you've done the work so I'll leave it to
you :-)
-Rahul
> Stefan
>
Re: Gump nags
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2010-04-22, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Gump nag mails need to be adjusted so they go to the new list(s) rather
>> than get re-routed. Do people prefer to have the nag mails go to the
>> notifications@ list or to dev@?
> Per design, all automated messages should go to notifications@ -- that
> would include JIRA (already done), SVN commit messages (already done,
> though may need moderation for each committers first commit), Bugzilla
> and Gump.
I thought so - and have already changed the Gump descriptors to reflect
this. As I discovered I am a moderator for both lists so can help with
moderating through. 8-)
Stefan
Re: Gump nags
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 2010-04-22, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Do we have a Bugzilla admin on this list? Atleast the following use
>>> Bugzilla and would need to be updated:
>>
>>> BCEL, BSF, JMeter, ORO, Regexp
>>
>> If notifications@jakarta was the email of a valid Bugzilla user I could
>> modify the products and their compoments to have this as the default
>> owner - and thus the address that gets all notifications. Unfortunately
>> I lack the karma to create new bugzilla users.
>>
> <snip/>
>
> OK, please add a comment to INFRA-2335 indicating what we need (unless
> someone on this list jumps in before that and does the deed).
>
> Currently, Bugzilla notifications are going to dev@ (due to qmail
> redirects) but we should get that changed to notifications@ soon.
>
<snip/>
I've asked for Bugzilla help on the infra list.
-Rahul
Re: Gump nags
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2010-04-22, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Do we have a Bugzilla admin on this list? Atleast the following use
>> Bugzilla and would need to be updated:
>
>> BCEL, BSF, JMeter, ORO, Regexp
>
> If notifications@jakarta was the email of a valid Bugzilla user I could
> modify the products and their compoments to have this as the default
> owner - and thus the address that gets all notifications. Unfortunately
> I lack the karma to create new bugzilla users.
>
<snip/>
OK, please add a comment to INFRA-2335 indicating what we need (unless
someone on this list jumps in before that and does the deed).
Currently, Bugzilla notifications are going to dev@ (due to qmail
redirects) but we should get that changed to notifications@ soon.
-Rahul
> Stefan
>
Re: Gump nags
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2010-04-22, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do we have a Bugzilla admin on this list? Atleast the following use
> Bugzilla and would need to be updated:
> BCEL, BSF, JMeter, ORO, Regexp
If notifications@jakarta was the email of a valid Bugzilla user I could
modify the products and their compoments to have this as the default
owner - and thus the address that gets all notifications. Unfortunately
I lack the karma to create new bugzilla users.
Stefan
Re: Gump nags
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Gump nag mails need to be adjusted so they go to the new list(s) rather
> than get re-routed. Do people prefer to have the nag mails go to the
> notifications@ list or to dev@?
>
<snip/>
Thanks, was about to send a similar email :-)
Per design, all automated messages should go to notifications@ -- that
would include JIRA (already done), SVN commit messages (already done,
though may need moderation for each committers first commit), Bugzilla
and Gump.
Do we have a Bugzilla admin on this list? Atleast the following use
Bugzilla and would need to be updated:
BCEL, BSF, JMeter, ORO, Regexp
-Rahul
> Stefan
>