RE: AxKit Shutdown

[Matt Sergeant <ms...@startechgroup.co.uk>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick [mailto:pat@patoche.org]
> 
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 09:48:52AM -0000, Matt Sergeant took 
> time to write:
> > This is sad indeed. Once everything is up and running again 
> I'll write a
> > complete document of the nightmares that getting it back up 
> again has been
> > and post it to the mod_perl and axkit lists.
> > 
> > Meanwhile you can get there at http://217.158.50.178/ - the 
> mailing list
> > links are back to axkit.org, so you need to edit the links 
> with the IP
> > address again.
> > 
> > Sorry for the downtime, it's *really* not my fault. Blame 
> NetSol, and Demon,
> > and BT, and ClaraNet (get the idea yet?).
> 
> This is understandable. However I'm sure that some people may like to
> host mirrors for you.
> I already offered you in private email to be a secondary NS for your
> domain names so that network outages have less consequences. It still
> stands.

As I've said to everyone of these offers: mirroring isn't the problem right
now - the web site is up at http://217.158.50.178/, it just doesn't have the
domain name. We don't really get the sort of traffic that requires a mirror
for bandwidth problems, and I've yet to get a complaint that it's down.

Thanks though.

Matt.

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

RE: AxKit Shutdown

[Dave Baker <da...@dsb3.com>]

> As I've said to everyone of these offers: mirroring isn't the problem right
> now - the web site is up at http://217.158.50.178/, it just doesn't have the
> domain name. We don't really get the sort of traffic that requires a mirror
> for bandwidth problems, and I've yet to get a complaint that it's down.
> 

Not that big a deal, but I'd have complained [1] long ago if the MX
records were working.

dave

[1] though, of course, I'd have used the word 'mention'