You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2009/11/10 23:56:33 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
The SDO and DAS projects are now structured as Tuscany subprojects
- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/das-java/
- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sdo-java/
I'll start working on the 1.x code base sometime tomorrow PST time and
move all branches and tags. As for the 1.5.2 branch and 1.x branch
(actually trunk) I would like to get a confirmation that nobody have
any big uncommitted changes before I can move it as the 1.x trunk.
For more details on the proposed changes, see the update SVN Structure
proposal [1]
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+SVN+Structure
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
<js...@apache.org> wrote:
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> Done. The new structure follows the description on the Wiki [1] and is
> similar to what has been done for the Java projects:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/das-cpp/
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-cpp/
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sdo-cpp/
>
> and under each directory:
> branches/
> tags/
> trunk/
>
> I've left a few cpp tags under:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/
>
> I think they can be removed as they're just interim release candidate tags
> and the final release tags are available in the new structure, if anybody
> has time to do it later this week...
>
Thanks Sebastien, I have also cleaned up the interim release candidate
tags you have mentioned.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> Luciano Resende wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Luciano Resende
>> <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Luciano Resende
>>> <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The SDO and DAS projects are now structured as Tuscany subprojects
>>>>
>>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/das-java/
>>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sdo-java/
>>>>
>>>> I'll start working on the 1.x code base sometime tomorrow PST time and
>>>> move all branches and tags. As for the 1.5.2 branch and 1.x branch
>>>> (actually trunk) I would like to get a confirmation that nobody have
>>>> any big uncommitted changes before I can move it as the 1.x trunk.
>>>>
>>>> For more details on the proposed changes, see the update SVN Structure
>>>> proposal [1]
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+SVN+Structure
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Most of the branches and tags for 1.x and 2.x are now on the new SVN
>>> structure
>>>
>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-1.x/
>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/
>>>
>>> As I didn't hear back from anyone regarding any big changes in 1.x or
>>> 1.5.2 branches, I'll move them to the new structure on Thursday around
>>> lunch PST time.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The new SVN structure is mostly in place, except for Natice (CPP) and
>> the 2.x trunk.
>> It would be good to get some help from the folks working on
>> Native(CPP) to get that in place.
>> As for the 2.x, when would be a good time to migrate that ? Is this
>> weekend a good time ?
>>
>
> OK, I'll try to do the cpp tree if I find some time tonight.
>
Done. The new structure follows the description on the Wiki [1] and is
similar to what has been done for the Java projects:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/das-cpp/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-cpp/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sdo-cpp/
and under each directory:
branches/
tags/
trunk/
I've left a few cpp tags under:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/
I think they can be removed as they're just interim release candidate
tags and the final release tags are available in the new structure, if
anybody has time to do it later this week...
[1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+SVN+Structure
--
Jean-Sebastien
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The SDO and DAS projects are now structured as Tuscany subprojects
>>>
>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/das-java/
>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sdo-java/
>>>
>>> I'll start working on the 1.x code base sometime tomorrow PST time and
>>> move all branches and tags. As for the 1.5.2 branch and 1.x branch
>>> (actually trunk) I would like to get a confirmation that nobody have
>>> any big uncommitted changes before I can move it as the 1.x trunk.
>>>
>>> For more details on the proposed changes, see the update SVN Structure
>>> proposal [1]
>>>
>>> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+SVN+Structure
>>>
>> Most of the branches and tags for 1.x and 2.x are now on the new SVN structure
>>
>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-1.x/
>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/
>>
>> As I didn't hear back from anyone regarding any big changes in 1.x or
>> 1.5.2 branches, I'll move them to the new structure on Thursday around
>> lunch PST time.
>>
>>
>
> The new SVN structure is mostly in place, except for Natice (CPP) and
> the 2.x trunk.
> It would be good to get some help from the folks working on
> Native(CPP) to get that in place.
> As for the 2.x, when would be a good time to migrate that ? Is this
> weekend a good time ?
>
OK, I'll try to do the cpp tree if I find some time tonight.
--
Jean-Sebastien
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Ok by me. I don't have any big changes outstanding at the moment.
>
> Simon
>
Done. I have also updated Website, 2.x development guide and posted in
Tuscany blog a summary of the recent changes.
Please let me know if you find any issues, I'll keep a close eye to
the list in the next couple hours/days just in case...
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
Ok by me. I don't have any big changes outstanding at the moment.
Simon
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
+1.
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Luciano Resende" <lu...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 10:04 AM
To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm done with the big check-in. Feel free to move the svn repo for 2.x
>>> trunk
>>> now :-).
>>>
>>
>> Others ?
>>
>
> Any chance we can move the current 2.x trunk [1] to it's new position
> in the new svn structure [2] in the next couple days ? I'd like to do
> it tomorrow around noon PST time if others are done with any big
> pending commits.
>
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/sca/
> [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm done with the big check-in. Feel free to move the svn repo for 2.x trunk
>> now :-).
>>
>
> Others ?
>
Any chance we can move the current 2.x trunk [1] to it's new position
in the new svn structure [2] in the next couple days ? I'd like to do
it tomorrow around noon PST time if others are done with any big
pending commits.
[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/sca/
[2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm done with the big check-in. Feel free to move the svn repo for 2.x trunk
> now :-).
>
Others ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I'm done with the big check-in. Feel free to move the svn repo for 2.x trunk
now :-).
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Luciano Resende" <lu...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 9:22 PM
To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can you wait a bit for 2.x? I'm working on the
>> RuntimeEndpoint/RuntimeEndpointReference to replace RuntimeWire [1]. Many
>> files are touched. I'll check them in as soon as the build is passing.
>>
>> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg07856.html
>>
>
> Sure, just wanted to check...
> I'll check next weekend again...
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you wait a bit for 2.x? I'm working on the
> RuntimeEndpoint/RuntimeEndpointReference to replace RuntimeWire [1]. Many
> files are touched. I'll check them in as soon as the build is passing.
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg07856.html
>
Sure, just wanted to check...
I'll check next weekend again...
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Can you wait a bit for 2.x? I'm working on the
RuntimeEndpoint/RuntimeEndpointReference to replace RuntimeWire [1]. Many
files are touched. I'll check them in as soon as the build is passing.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg07856.html
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Luciano Resende" <lu...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 8:37 PM
To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> The SDO and DAS projects are now structured as Tuscany subprojects
>>>
>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/das-java/
>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sdo-java/
>>>
>>> I'll start working on the 1.x code base sometime tomorrow PST time and
>>> move all branches and tags. As for the 1.5.2 branch and 1.x branch
>>> (actually trunk) I would like to get a confirmation that nobody have
>>> any big uncommitted changes before I can move it as the 1.x trunk.
>>>
>>> For more details on the proposed changes, see the update SVN Structure
>>> proposal [1]
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+SVN+Structure
>>>
>>
>> Most of the branches and tags for 1.x and 2.x are now on the new SVN
>> structure
>>
>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-1.x/
>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/
>>
>> As I didn't hear back from anyone regarding any big changes in 1.x or
>> 1.5.2 branches, I'll move them to the new structure on Thursday around
>> lunch PST time.
>>
>>
>
> The new SVN structure is mostly in place, except for Natice (CPP) and
> the 2.x trunk.
> It would be good to get some help from the folks working on
> Native(CPP) to get that in place.
> As for the 2.x, when would be a good time to migrate that ? Is this
> weekend a good time ?
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The SDO and DAS projects are now structured as Tuscany subprojects
>>
>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/das-java/
>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sdo-java/
>>
>> I'll start working on the 1.x code base sometime tomorrow PST time and
>> move all branches and tags. As for the 1.5.2 branch and 1.x branch
>> (actually trunk) I would like to get a confirmation that nobody have
>> any big uncommitted changes before I can move it as the 1.x trunk.
>>
>> For more details on the proposed changes, see the update SVN Structure
>> proposal [1]
>>
>> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+SVN+Structure
>>
>
> Most of the branches and tags for 1.x and 2.x are now on the new SVN structure
>
> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-1.x/
> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/
>
> As I didn't hear back from anyone regarding any big changes in 1.x or
> 1.5.2 branches, I'll move them to the new structure on Thursday around
> lunch PST time.
>
>
The new SVN structure is mostly in place, except for Natice (CPP) and
the 2.x trunk.
It would be good to get some help from the folks working on
Native(CPP) to get that in place.
As for the 2.x, when would be a good time to migrate that ? Is this
weekend a good time ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The SDO and DAS projects are now structured as Tuscany subprojects
>
> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/das-java/
> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sdo-java/
>
> I'll start working on the 1.x code base sometime tomorrow PST time and
> move all branches and tags. As for the 1.5.2 branch and 1.x branch
> (actually trunk) I would like to get a confirmation that nobody have
> any big uncommitted changes before I can move it as the 1.x trunk.
>
> For more details on the proposed changes, see the update SVN Structure
> proposal [1]
>
> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+SVN+Structure
>
Most of the branches and tags for 1.x and 2.x are now on the new SVN structure
- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-1.x/
- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/
As I didn't hear back from anyone regarding any big changes in 1.x or
1.5.2 branches, I'll move them to the new structure on Thursday around
lunch PST time.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/