You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> on 2008/02/01 00:34:22 UTC
[VOTE] Release the specs
I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/specs-1.4
The tag is available at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4
All the jars, source and javadocs should contain the legal files, the
resources have been fixed in the jsp spec and the servlet legal
files have been updated with w3c license.
Please double check and vote:
[ ] +1 Release the specs
[ ] -1 Do not release those specs (another problem ?)
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release the specs
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 1, 2008 4:25 PM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >
> > What do you mean by skipped version numbers and different formats ?
>
> By format, I meant the new, non-standard tags/specs-1.4 destination.
> By skipped version numbers -- the current released version of
> annotations is 1.0, the previous vote was for 1.1.1, and this vote was
> for 1.1.2 (IIRC). Looks like in your new vote, the version number is
> back to 1.1.1.
I guess I did something wrong but I think both problems has been fixed.
I have rebuild the whole release a few hours ago and restarted a vote.
>
> --kevan
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release the specs
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 1, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> What do you mean by skipped version numbers and different formats ?
By format, I meant the new, non-standard tags/specs-1.4 destination.
By skipped version numbers -- the current released version of
annotations is 1.0, the previous vote was for 1.1.1, and this vote was
for 1.1.2 (IIRC). Looks like in your new vote, the version number is
back to 1.1.1.
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release the specs
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 1, 2008 6:24 AM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/specs-1.4
> The tag is available at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4
>
> All the jars, source and javadocs should contain the legal files, the
> resources have been fixed in the jsp spec and the servlet legal
> files have been updated with w3c license.
> Please double check and vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the specs
> [ ] -1 Do not release those specs (another problem ?)
>
> Guillaume,
> We should not be releasing the jaspi spec. So happens, it also has a problem
> with the src license headers. I've fixed the jaspi src in trunk. But jaspi
> should be removed from tags and should not be released. FYI, we'll be
> removing jaspi-related code from 2.1 after we create the 2.1 server branch.
>
> I'm surprised to see the skipped version numbers and different format in the
> tags directory for the new releases. However, src and binaries look good.
> Assuming the new binaries pass tck and the jaspi spec is deleted, I'm +1.
>
> --kevan
What do you mean by skipped version numbers and different formats ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release the specs
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/specs-1.4
> The tag is available at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4
>
> All the jars, source and javadocs should contain the legal files, the
> resources have been fixed in the jsp spec and the servlet legal
> files have been updated with w3c license.
> Please double check and vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the specs
> [ ] -1 Do not release those specs (another problem ?)
Guillaume,
We should not be releasing the jaspi spec. So happens, it also has a
problem with the src license headers. I've fixed the jaspi src in
trunk. But jaspi should be removed from tags and should not be
released. FYI, we'll be removing jaspi-related code from 2.1 after we
create the 2.1 server branch.
I'm surprised to see the skipped version numbers and different format
in the tags directory for the new releases. However, src and binaries
look good. Assuming the new binaries pass tck and the jaspi spec is
deleted, I'm +1.
--kevan
[CLOSED][VOTE] Release the specs
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/specs-1.4
> The tag is available at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4
>
> All the jars, source and javadocs should contain the legal files, the
> resources have been fixed in the jsp spec and the servlet legal
> files have been updated with w3c license.
> Please double check and vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the specs
> [ ] -1 Do not release those specs (another problem ?)
There were some issues uncovered with these specs builds. This vote
has been cancelled and a new vote started
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release the specs
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
The vote is cancelled.
On Feb 1, 2008 12:34 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/specs-1.4
> The tag is available at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4
>
> All the jars, source and javadocs should contain the legal files, the
> resources have been fixed in the jsp spec and the servlet legal
> files have been updated with w3c license.
> Please double check and vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the specs
> [ ] -1 Do not release those specs (another problem ?)
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release the specs
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
I'm also -1 due to the tagging changes.
David Jencks wrote:
> Sorry but this does not follow our agreed policy of tagging the specs
> individually. IMO the tagging is unacceptable. We had a long drawn
> out war on this and I'm afraid I think that changing it without
> agreement is not a good idea and will lead to too much confusion.
>
> I also don't think the root pom should have the list of spec modules
> in it.
>
> I apologize for not raising this concern earlier but I assumed you
> intended to have one vote on all the specs rather than change the
> manner in which they are built.
>
> -1 due to the tagging.
>
>
> david jencks
>
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
>> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/specs-1.4
>> The tag is available at
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4
>>
>> All the jars, source and javadocs should contain the legal files, the
>> resources have been fixed in the jsp spec and the servlet legal
>> files have been updated with w3c license.
>> Please double check and vote:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release the specs
>> [ ] -1 Do not release those specs (another problem ?)
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release the specs
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
Sorry but this does not follow our agreed policy of tagging the specs
individually. IMO the tagging is unacceptable. We had a long drawn
out war on this and I'm afraid I think that changing it without
agreement is not a good idea and will lead to too much confusion.
I also don't think the root pom should have the list of spec modules
in it.
I apologize for not raising this concern earlier but I assumed you
intended to have one vote on all the specs rather than change the
manner in which they are built.
-1 due to the tagging.
david jencks
On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/specs-1.4
> The tag is available at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4
>
> All the jars, source and javadocs should contain the legal files, the
> resources have been fixed in the jsp spec and the servlet legal
> files have been updated with w3c license.
> Please double check and vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the specs
> [ ] -1 Do not release those specs (another problem ?)
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/