You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Wei-Chiu Chuang (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/04/02 09:20:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15945) DataNodes with zero capacity and zero blocks should be decommissioned immediately

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17313736#comment-17313736 ] 

Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-15945:
----------------------------------------

Thanks a lot for reporting the issue. Make sense to me. 

> DataNodes with zero capacity and zero blocks should be decommissioned immediately
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-15945
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15945
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Takanobu Asanuma
>            Assignee: Takanobu Asanuma
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Such as when there is a storage problem, DataNode capacity and block count sometimes become zero.
>  When we tried to decommission those DataNodes, we ran into an issue that the decommission did not complete because the NameNode had not received their first block report.
> {noformat}
> INFO  blockmanagement.DatanodeAdminManager (DatanodeAdminManager.java:startDecommission(183)) - Starting decommission of 127.0.0.1:58343 [DISK]DS-a29de094-2b19-4834-8318-76cda3bd86bf:NORMAL:127.0.0.1:58343 with 0 blocks
> INFO  blockmanagement.BlockManager (BlockManager.java:isNodeHealthyForDecommissionOrMaintenance(4587)) - Node 127.0.0.1:58343 hasn't sent its first block report.
> INFO  blockmanagement.DatanodeAdminDefaultMonitor (DatanodeAdminDefaultMonitor.java:check(258)) - Node 127.0.0.1:58343 isn't healthy. It needs to replicate 0 more blocks. Decommission In Progress is still in progress.
> {noformat}
> To make matters worse, even if we stopped these DataNodes afterward, they remained in a dead&decommissioning state until NameNode restarted.
> I think those DataNodes should be decommissioned immediately even if NameNode hasn't recived the first block report.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org