JEXL change desired

[Do...@percussion.com]

Hi,

I would like to propose a  change to JEXL to allow the introspector to be 
plugged in rather than hardcoded. It looks like this would be a fairly 
simple change.  My specific reason is that I would like to plug in a new 
Introspector into both Velocity and JEXL in our implementation to allow 
the recognition of certain Java 1.5 constructs - specifically varargs.

Regards,
Doug

Re: JEXL change desired

[Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>]

Sounds reasonable.

On 1/18/06, Doug_Rand@percussion.com <Do...@percussion.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a  change to JEXL to allow the introspector to be
> plugged in rather than hardcoded. It looks like this would be a fairly
> simple change.  My specific reason is that I would like to plug in a new
> Introspector into both Velocity and JEXL in our implementation to allow
> the recognition of certain Java 1.5 constructs - specifically varargs.
>
> Regards,
> Doug
>
>
>


--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
"In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than
your fear of failure." - Bill Cosby

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: JEXL change desired

[peter royal <pr...@apache.org>]

On Jan 17, 2006, at 2:15 PM, Doug_Rand@percussion.com wrote:
> I would like to propose a  change to JEXL to allow the introspector  
> to be
> plugged in rather than hardcoded. It looks like this would be a fairly
> simple change.  My specific reason is that I would like to plug in  
> a new
> Introspector into both Velocity and JEXL in our implementation to  
> allow
> the recognition of certain Java 1.5 constructs - specifically varargs.

go for it.. it'd be great to have a java 1.5-ish introspector  
shipping with jexl as well! :)
-pete