You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by "Michael Dick (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/08/02 17:24:52 UTC

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-295) ArrayIndexOutofBoundsException when under load and within a managed Transaction

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517291 ] 

Michael Dick commented on OPENJPA-295:
--------------------------------------

Getting back to Marc's comment. I think the difference in this case is that WebSphere Application Server (and I'm guessing Geronimo) use the TransactionSynchronizationRegistry. 

When we use the TSR to get a TransactionManager it returns a TransactionManagerFacade (a singleton), calling getTransaction() on the facade returns a singleton (itself) as well. If I haven't misread the code, we'll hit this problem fairly quickly with any Application Server that uses the TSR.

I can think of two potential fixes (assuming I've identified the problem correctly) : 

1. Use a concurrent set (similar to the patch I attached earlier). 

2. The TSR API provides a getTransactionKey() method. The TransactionManagerFacade could be modified to return a new "TransactionFacade" Object when getTransaction is called. The TransactionFacade could use the transactionKey's hashcode (which should be unique to each transaction), and we'll avoid the collision. 

Does anyone see a problem with either approach (or something I've missed) ? 


> ArrayIndexOutofBoundsException when under load and within a managed Transaction
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-295
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-295
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jpa
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>         Environment: openjpa running under WebSphere development builds, as well as Geronimo development builds
>            Reporter: Rob Wisniewski
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: OPENJPA-295.diff.txt
>
>
> Recent development builds of our WAS products as well as the Geronimo project are seeing exceptions when running under load.  An example of the exception is below:
> Caused by: 
> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
> 	at java.util.ArrayList.add(ArrayList.java:378)
> 	at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.AbstractBrokerFactory.syncWithManagedTransaction(AbstractBrokerFactory.java:684)
> 	... 39 more
> This is the deepest trace I can get with the actual exception, but the wrappering exception shows this stack trace for geronimo:
> <1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-SNAPSHOT nonfatal general error> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.PersistenceException: null
> 	at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.AbstractBrokerFactory.syncWithManagedTransaction(AbstractBrokerFactory.java:690)
> 	at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.initialize(BrokerImpl.java:304)
> 	at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.AbstractBrokerFactory.newBroker(AbstractBrokerFactory.java:182)
> 	at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingBrokerFactory.newBroker(DelegatingBrokerFactory.java:142)
> 	at org.apache.openjpa.persistence.EntityManagerFactoryImpl.createEntityManager(EntityManagerFactoryImpl.java:190)
> 	at org.apache.openjpa.persistence.EntityManagerFactoryImpl.createEntityManager(EntityManagerFactoryImpl.java:55)
> 	at org.apache.geronimo.persistence.CMPEntityManagerTxScoped.createEntityManager(CMPEntityManagerTxScoped.java:74)
> 	at org.apache.geronimo.persistence.CMPEntityManagerTxScoped.getEntityManager(CMPEntityManagerTxScoped.java:55)
> 	at org.apache.geronimo.persistence.CMPEntityManagerTxScoped.createNamedQuery(CMPEntityManagerTxScoped.java:259)
> 	at org.apache.geronimo.samples.daytrader.ejb3.TradeSLSBBean.getClosedOrders(TradeSLSBBean.java:335)
> This is happening in two separate products with two different JTA implementations, and also both of these products were working at one point.
> Any ideas?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.