You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/03/14 01:49:42 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6038) Allow JournalNode to handle editlog produced by new release with future layoutversion

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13934370#comment-13934370 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6038:
---------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12634559/HDFS-6038.008.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 16 new or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests in hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/contrib/bkjournal:

                  org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.tools.offlineEditsViewer.TestOfflineEditsViewer

                                      The test build failed in hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/contrib/bkjournal 

    {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/6398//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/6398//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Allow JournalNode to handle editlog produced by new release with future layoutversion
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6038
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6038
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: journal-node, namenode
>            Reporter: Haohui Mai
>            Assignee: Jing Zhao
>         Attachments: HDFS-6038.000.patch, HDFS-6038.001.patch, HDFS-6038.002.patch, HDFS-6038.003.patch, HDFS-6038.004.patch, HDFS-6038.005.patch, HDFS-6038.006.patch, HDFS-6038.007.patch, HDFS-6038.008.patch, editsStored
>
>
> In HA setup, the JNs receive edit logs (blob) from the NN and write into edit log files. In order to write well-formed edit log files, the JNs prepend a header for each edit log file. The problem is that the JN hard-codes the version (i.e., {{NameNodeLayoutVersion}} in the edit log, therefore it generates incorrect edit logs when the newer release bumps the {{NameNodeLayoutVersion}} during rolling upgrade.
> In the meanwhile, currently JN tries to decode the in-progress editlog segment in order to know the last txid in the segment. In the rolling upgrade scenario, the JN with the old software may not be able to correctly decode the editlog generated by the new software.
> This jira makes the following changes to allow JN to handle editlog produced by software with future layoutversion:
> 1. Change the NN--JN startLogSegment RPC signature and let NN specify the layoutversion for the new editlog segment.
> 2. Persist a length field for each editlog op to indicate the total length of the op. Instead of calling EditLogFileInputStream#validateEditLog to get the last txid of an in-progress editlog segment, a new method scanEditLog is added and used by JN which does not decode each editlog op but uses the length to quickly jump to the next op.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)