You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by cbu <ch...@puma.com> on 2007/01/19 20:04:55 UTC
Network of Brokers - publishing on broker x - consuming on broker
1...n
Hello,
I think I've read that quite a few people did have problems to setup a
network of brokers where you can publish on publishing on broker x but
consume the message on broker 1...n.
As an example:
- publish on broker 2 a message on a topic
- consume the message from broker 1-9
As additional information:
- I setup such a broker network.
- I can see in the log files the brokers connecting to each other
- I can see in the log file connecting the clients to the assigned brokers
- I did set on the network connector the prefech=1, dynamiconly=false,
networkTTL=99, bridgeTempDestinations=true, failover=true
STILL: I can reveice the message JUST on the broker I published the message.
Any hint ...
-- Chris
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers---publishing-on-broker-x---consuming-on-broker-1...n-tf3041583.html#a8454658
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Spam: 5.0] Network of Brokers - publishing on broker x -
consuming on broker 1...n
Posted by Mathulan <ma...@gmail.com>.
Well I was expecting the same. And the queue/topic length gets updated on B
as soon as a publisher send the message on A. but there is no update on C.
And the consumer/subs doesn't get the message on C.
cbu wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was told that there is no forwarding of the message ... just if a
> consumer connects at Broker D the message will be forwarded from A to D.
> Still interessted?
>
> - C.
>
>
> Mathulan wrote:
>>
>> Hi ,
>>
>> I am newbie for ActiveMQ.
>>
>> Could you please let me know the configuration u used.
>> The set up I am trying to bring up is
>> BrokerA -> BrokerB <-> BrokerC, BrokerD, etc....
>> BrokerA - Pure publisher attached
>> BrokerB - Middleman, will forward Msgs from BrokerA to set of machines
>> (Including BrokerC, D) and distribute Msgs from C->D and visa versa.
>> BrokerC,D - publishers and subscribers are attached
>>
>> After configuring the network connectors (2 on BrokerB, 1 each on
>> BrokerA, C,D). I see in the jconsole that once Msgs are published the
>> appear in A,B but NOT in C,D. And the consumer attached to C never
>> receive any messages. I checked the msg transfer between one by one
>> (A->B, B->). That worked. But not from A ->C.
>>
>> Please help.
>>
>> Kind Regards
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>> cbu wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok, this is aboutthe forward on demand bridge, or? So is there an ALWAYS
>>> FORWARD bridge?
>>>
>>> - C.
>>>
>>>
>>> Marlon Santos wrote:
>>>>
>>>> HI,
>>>>
>>>> The message will not be available to consumers on other brokers mainly
>>>> because messages are forwarded based on demand.. so it will be
>>>> forwarded only to other brokers when there are consumers for the
>>>> message.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> cbu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> both brokers named differently. It seems it was purely the policy
>>>>> settings.
>>>>>
>>>>> Still: if I publish messages on all brokers and shutdown one broker
>>>>> all messages published on that broker are not available to consumers
>>>>> connected to other brokers as long as you don't bring back this
>>>>> broker.
>>>>>
>>>>> - C
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers---publishing-on-broker-x---consuming-on-broker-1...n-tf3041583s2354.html#a9118214
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Spam: 5.0] Network of Brokers - publishing on broker x -
consuming on broker 1...n
Posted by cbu <ch...@puma.com>.
Hello,
I was told that there is no forwarding of the message ... just if a consumer
connects at Broker D the message will be forwarded from A to D.
Still interessted?
- C.
Mathulan wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
> I am newbie for ActiveMQ.
>
> Could you please let me know the configuration u used.
> The set up I am trying to bring up is
> BrokerA -> BrokerB <-> BrokerC, BrokerD, etc....
> BrokerA - Pure publisher attached
> BrokerB - Middleman, will forward Msgs from BrokerA to set of machines
> (Including BrokerC, D) and distribute Msgs from C->D and visa versa.
> BrokerC,D - publishers and subscribers are attached
>
> After configuring the network connectors (2 on BrokerB, 1 each on BrokerA,
> C,D). I see in the jconsole that once Msgs are published the appear in A,B
> but NOT in C,D. And the consumer attached to C never receive any messages.
> I checked the msg transfer between one by one (A->B, B->). That worked.
> But not from A ->C.
>
> Please help.
>
> Kind Regards
> Matt
>
>
>
> cbu wrote:
>>
>> Ok, this is aboutthe forward on demand bridge, or? So is there an ALWAYS
>> FORWARD bridge?
>>
>> - C.
>>
>>
>> Marlon Santos wrote:
>>>
>>> HI,
>>>
>>> The message will not be available to consumers on other brokers mainly
>>> because messages are forwarded based on demand.. so it will be forwarded
>>> only to other brokers when there are consumers for the message.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> cbu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> both brokers named differently. It seems it was purely the policy
>>>> settings.
>>>>
>>>> Still: if I publish messages on all brokers and shutdown one broker all
>>>> messages published on that broker are not available to consumers
>>>> connected to other brokers as long as you don't bring back this broker.
>>>>
>>>> - C
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers---publishing-on-broker-x---consuming-on-broker-1...n-tf3041583s2354.html#a9118103
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Spam: 5.0] Network of Brokers - publishing on broker x -
consuming on broker 1...n
Posted by Mathulan <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi ,
I am newbie for ActiveMQ.
Could you please let me know the configuration u used.
The set up I am trying to bring up is
BrokerA -> BrokerB <-> BrokerC, BrokerD, etc....
BrokerA - Pure publisher attached
BrokerB - Middleman, will forward Msgs from BrokerA to set of machines
(Including BrokerC, D) and distribute Msgs from C->D and visa versa.
BrokerC,D - publishers and subscribers are attached
After configuring the network connectors (2 on BrokerB, 1 each on BrokerA,
C,D). I see in the jconsole that once Msgs are published the appear in A,B
but NOT in C,D. And the consumer attached to C never receive any messages. I
checked the msg transfer between one by one (A->B, B->). That worked. But
not from A ->C.
Please help.
Kind Regards
Matt
cbu wrote:
>
> Ok, this is aboutthe forward on demand bridge, or? So is there an ALWAYS
> FORWARD bridge?
>
> - C.
>
>
> Marlon Santos wrote:
>>
>> HI,
>>
>> The message will not be available to consumers on other brokers mainly
>> because messages are forwarded based on demand.. so it will be forwarded
>> only to other brokers when there are consumers for the message.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> cbu wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> both brokers named differently. It seems it was purely the policy
>>> settings.
>>>
>>> Still: if I publish messages on all brokers and shutdown one broker all
>>> messages published on that broker are not available to consumers
>>> connected to other brokers as long as you don't bring back this broker.
>>>
>>> - C
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers---publishing-on-broker-x---consuming-on-broker-1...n-tf3041583s2354.html#a9117980
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Network of Brokers - publishing on broker x - consuming on
broker 1...n
Posted by cbu <ch...@puma.com>.
Ok, this is aboutthe forward on demand bridge, or? So is there an ALWAYS
FORWARD bridge?
- C.
Marlon Santos wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> The message will not be available to consumers on other brokers mainly
> because messages are forwarded based on demand.. so it will be forwarded
> only to other brokers when there are consumers for the message.
>
> Regards
>
>
> cbu wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> both brokers named differently. It seems it was purely the policy
>> settings.
>>
>> Still: if I publish messages on all brokers and shutdown one broker all
>> messages published on that broker are not available to consumers
>> connected to other brokers as long as you don't bring back this broker.
>>
>> - C
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers---publishing-on-broker-x---consuming-on-broker-1...n-tf3041583.html#a8743954
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Network of Brokers - publishing on broker x - consuming on
broker 1...n
Posted by Marlon Santos <ms...@exist.com>.
HI,
The message will not be available to consumers on other brokers mainly
because messages are forwarded based on demand.. so it will be forwarded
only to other brokers when there are consumers for the message.
Regards
cbu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> both brokers named differently. It seems it was purely the policy
> settings.
>
> Still: if I publish messages on all brokers and shutdown one broker all
> messages published on that broker are not available to consumers connected
> to other brokers as long as you don't bring back this broker.
>
> - C
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers---publishing-on-broker-x---consuming-on-broker-1...n-tf3041583.html#a8742526
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Network of Brokers - publishing on broker x - consuming on
broker 1...n
Posted by cbu <ch...@puma.com>.
Hi,
both brokers named differently. It seems it was purely the policy settings.
Still: if I publish messages on all brokers and shutdown one broker all
messages published on that broker are not available to consumers connected
to other brokers as long as you don't bring back this broker.
- C
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers---publishing-on-broker-x---consuming-on-broker-1...n-tf3041583.html#a8685204
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Network of Brokers - publishing on broker x - consuming on broker 1...n
Posted by Kit Plummer <ki...@gmail.com>.
Are all brokers named something different?
On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:22 PM, cbu wrote:
>
> Try both:
> - publishing 1000 messages on queues and would like to see some
> consumed on
> client's attached to remote brokers as well (did read the thing about
> preferring the fastest consumer ...)
> - publishing 1000 messages on topic and WANT DEFINITLY to see some
> consumed
> on client's attached to remote brokers as well (did read the thing
> about
> preferring the fastest consumer ...)
>
> -- C.
>
>
> Adrian Co wrote:
>>
>> Are you using queues or topics?
>>
>> Are you consuming from all brokers simultaneously? ActiveMQ tends to
>> give preference to local consumers I think.
>>
>> cbu wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I think I've read that quite a few people did have problems to
>>> setup a
>>> network of brokers where you can publish on publishing on broker
>>> x but
>>> consume the message on broker 1...n.
>>>
>>> As an example:
>>> - publish on broker 2 a message on a topic
>>> - consume the message from broker 1-9
>>>
>>> As additional information:
>>> - I setup such a broker network.
>>> - I can see in the log files the brokers connecting to each other
>>> - I can see in the log file connecting the clients to the assigned
>>> brokers
>>> - I did set on the network connector the prefech=1,
>>> dynamiconly=false,
>>> networkTTL=99, bridgeTempDestinations=true, failover=true
>>>
>>> STILL: I can reveice the message JUST on the broker I published the
>>> message.
>>>
>>> Any hint ...
>>>
>>> -- Chris
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-
> Brokers---publishing-on-broker-x---consuming-on-broker-1...n-
> tf3041583.html#a8455050
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Network of Brokers - publishing on broker x - consuming on
broker 1...n
Posted by cbu <ch...@puma.com>.
Hello,
might be - but should a "strictOrderDispatchPolicy" not just simply ensure
the order of the received messages to be consumed also in that order no
matter whether it's one or more consumers?
- C.
elliottjf wrote:
>
> any chance that this issue could be related to the behavior of "exclusive
> consumer" queues on a distributed network? i'm still trying to figure out
> if that is supported or not.
> - joe
>
>
> cbu wrote:
>>
>> NEW FINDING!!!!!
>>
>> if you set this policy - queue messages are not distributed on a network:
>> <policyEntry queue=">">
>> <dispatchPolicy>
>> <strictOrderDispatchPolicy/>
>> </dispatchPolicy>
>> </policyEntry>
>>
>> Is it a bug?
>>
>>
>> - C.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers---publishing-on-broker-x---consuming-on-broker-1...n-tf3041583.html#a8743962
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Network of Brokers - publishing on broker x - consuming on
broker 1...n
Posted by elliottjf <jf...@pobox.com>.
any chance that this issue could be related to the behavior of "exclusive
consumer" queues on a distributed network? i'm still trying to figure out
if that is supported or not.
- joe
cbu wrote:
>
> NEW FINDING!!!!!
>
> if you set this policy - queue messages are not distributed on a network:
> <policyEntry queue=">">
> <dispatchPolicy>
> <strictOrderDispatchPolicy/>
> </dispatchPolicy>
> </policyEntry>
>
> Is it a bug?
>
>
> - C.
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers---publishing-on-broker-x---consuming-on-broker-1...n-tf3041583.html#a8741662
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Network of Brokers - publishing on broker x - consuming on
broker 1...n
Posted by cbu <ch...@puma.com>.
NEW FINDING!!!!!
if you set this policy - queue messages are not distributed on a network:
<policyEntry queue=">">
<dispatchPolicy>
<strictOrderDispatchPolicy/>
</dispatchPolicy>
</policyEntry>
Is it a bug?
- C.
cbu wrote:
>
> Try both:
> - publishing 1000 messages on queues and would like to see some consumed
> on client's attached to remote brokers as well (did read the thing about
> preferring the fastest consumer ...)
> - publishing 1000 messages on topic and WANT DEFINITLY to see some
> consumed on client's attached to remote brokers as well (did read the
> thing about preferring the fastest consumer ...)
>
> -- C.
>
>
> Adrian Co wrote:
>>
>> Are you using queues or topics?
>>
>> Are you consuming from all brokers simultaneously? ActiveMQ tends to
>> give preference to local consumers I think.
>>
>> cbu wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I think I've read that quite a few people did have problems to setup a
>>> network of brokers where you can publish on publishing on broker x but
>>> consume the message on broker 1...n.
>>>
>>> As an example:
>>> - publish on broker 2 a message on a topic
>>> - consume the message from broker 1-9
>>>
>>> As additional information:
>>> - I setup such a broker network.
>>> - I can see in the log files the brokers connecting to each other
>>> - I can see in the log file connecting the clients to the assigned
>>> brokers
>>> - I did set on the network connector the prefech=1, dynamiconly=false,
>>> networkTTL=99, bridgeTempDestinations=true, failover=true
>>>
>>> STILL: I can reveice the message JUST on the broker I published the
>>> message.
>>>
>>> Any hint ...
>>>
>>> -- Chris
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers---publishing-on-broker-x---consuming-on-broker-1...n-tf3041583.html#a8455211
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Network of Brokers - publishing on broker x - consuming on
broker 1...n
Posted by cbu <ch...@puma.com>.
Try both:
- publishing 1000 messages on queues and would like to see some consumed on
client's attached to remote brokers as well (did read the thing about
preferring the fastest consumer ...)
- publishing 1000 messages on topic and WANT DEFINITLY to see some consumed
on client's attached to remote brokers as well (did read the thing about
preferring the fastest consumer ...)
-- C.
Adrian Co wrote:
>
> Are you using queues or topics?
>
> Are you consuming from all brokers simultaneously? ActiveMQ tends to
> give preference to local consumers I think.
>
> cbu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think I've read that quite a few people did have problems to setup a
>> network of brokers where you can publish on publishing on broker x but
>> consume the message on broker 1...n.
>>
>> As an example:
>> - publish on broker 2 a message on a topic
>> - consume the message from broker 1-9
>>
>> As additional information:
>> - I setup such a broker network.
>> - I can see in the log files the brokers connecting to each other
>> - I can see in the log file connecting the clients to the assigned
>> brokers
>> - I did set on the network connector the prefech=1, dynamiconly=false,
>> networkTTL=99, bridgeTempDestinations=true, failover=true
>>
>> STILL: I can reveice the message JUST on the broker I published the
>> message.
>>
>> Any hint ...
>>
>> -- Chris
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers---publishing-on-broker-x---consuming-on-broker-1...n-tf3041583.html#a8455050
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Network of Brokers - publishing on broker x - consuming on broker
1...n
Posted by Adrian Co <ac...@exist.com>.
Are you using queues or topics?
Are you consuming from all brokers simultaneously? ActiveMQ tends to
give preference to local consumers I think.
cbu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I've read that quite a few people did have problems to setup a
> network of brokers where you can publish on publishing on broker x but
> consume the message on broker 1...n.
>
> As an example:
> - publish on broker 2 a message on a topic
> - consume the message from broker 1-9
>
> As additional information:
> - I setup such a broker network.
> - I can see in the log files the brokers connecting to each other
> - I can see in the log file connecting the clients to the assigned brokers
> - I did set on the network connector the prefech=1, dynamiconly=false,
> networkTTL=99, bridgeTempDestinations=true, failover=true
>
> STILL: I can reveice the message JUST on the broker I published the message.
>
> Any hint ...
>
> -- Chris
>
>