You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-commits@xmlgraphics.apache.org by je...@apache.org on 2005/11/09 09:58:24 UTC
svn commit: r332007 -
/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo
Author: jeremias
Date: Wed Nov 9 00:58:20 2005
New Revision: 332007
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332007&view=rev
Log:
Test to check FO tree building when no namespace prefix is used.
Added:
xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo (with props)
Added: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo?rev=332007&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo (added)
+++ xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo Wed Nov 9 00:58:20 2005
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!--
+ Copyright 2005 The Apache Software Foundation
+
+ Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+ you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+ You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+ http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+ Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ limitations under the License.
+-->
+<!-- $Id$ -->
+<!-- This test verifies that an FO document can also be loaded if it doesn't use a namespace prefix. -->
+<root xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format" xmlns:test="http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/test">
+ <layout-master-set>
+ <simple-page-master master-name="A4" page-height="29.7cm" page-width="21cm" margin="2cm">
+ <region-body/>
+ </simple-page-master>
+ </layout-master-set>
+ <page-sequence master-reference="A4">
+ <flow flow-name="xsl-region-body">
+ <block>Hello World!
+ <test:assert property="font-family" expected="sans-serif"/>
+ <test:assert property="font-size" expected="12000mpt"/>
+ </block>
+ </flow>
+ </page-sequence>
+</root>
Propchange: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
svn:eol-style = native
Propchange: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
svn:keywords = Id
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-commits-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-commits-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r332007 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>.
I know it's not strictly necessary. It's just there for regression
testing purposes and as a demonstration that you don't have to use the
fo: prefix. It doesn't hurt, does it?
On 09.11.2005 21:38:32 Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:58:24AM -0000, jeremias@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: jeremias
> > Date: Wed Nov 9 00:58:20 2005
> > New Revision: 332007
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332007&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Test to check FO tree building when no namespace prefix is used.
>
> Why is this necessary? Doesn't the parser resolve the prefix and then
> hide it from FOP?
Jeremias Maerki
Re: svn commit: r332007 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo
Posted by Simon Pepping <sp...@leverkruid.nl>.
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:58:24AM -0000, jeremias@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jeremias
> Date: Wed Nov 9 00:58:20 2005
> New Revision: 332007
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332007&view=rev
> Log:
> Test to check FO tree building when no namespace prefix is used.
Why is this necessary? Doesn't the parser resolve the prefix and then
hide it from FOP?
Simon
--
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl