You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/02/18 02:13:05 UTC

[GitHub] [airflow] TV4Fun commented on issue #7098: [AIRFLOW-4453] Make behavior of `none_failed` consistent with documentation

TV4Fun commented on issue #7098: [AIRFLOW-4453] Make behavior of `none_failed` consistent with documentation
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7098#issuecomment-587240265
 
 
   Hi @yuqian90! I would like to work more on this, but am going to he very
   busy for the foreseeable future. If someone would like to take this over or
   make their own version, I have no objection.
   
   On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 5:28 PM yuqian90 <no...@github.com> wrote:
   
   > Hi, @TV4Fun <https://github.com/TV4Fun> would you like to continue
   > working on this PR? This is definitely a good change to make. The issue
   > regarding nested BranchPythonOperator can be addressed with something
   > like the create_join() in my previous comment. Please consider it. Thanks!
   >
   > —
   > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
   > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7098?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABD4ECE6QP4BQNOAQCR5SJ3RDM2T5A5CNFSM4KEBP7VKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEMAHBQA#issuecomment-587231424>,
   > or unsubscribe
   > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABD4ECFHJWESFZCYKYAVELTRDM2T5ANCNFSM4KEBP7VA>
   > .
   >
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services