Not installing Berkeley on the client but using Berkeley on the server

[Matthew Kidd <Ma...@cappsdigital.com>]

Our svn server has been set up on a Mac OS X server running 10.3.9 and is using Berkeley DB. I'm installing our first client on a 10.3.9 desktop and could not install Berkeley due to the abscence of libmm which I could also not find anywhere on the net so I could have Berkeley on the client. My question is if our repository is located on teh server does it matter if the clients use FSFS since all changes, commits, etc are being recorded and kept on the server? 

---

R. Matthew Kidd
Junior Engineer
Capps Digital
35 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601
312.220.5596
matthew.kidd@cappsdigital.com

Re: Not installing Berkeley on the client but using Berkeley on the server

[Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>]

On 7/14/06, Matthew Kidd <Ma...@cappsdigital.com> wrote:
>
>
>  Our svn server has been set up on a Mac OS X server running 10.3.9 and is
> using Berkeley DB. I'm installing our first client on a 10.3.9 desktop and
> could not install Berkeley due to the abscence of libmm which I could also
> not find anywhere on the net so I could have Berkeley on the client. My
> question is if our repository is located on teh server does it matter if the
> clients use FSFS since all changes, commits, etc are being recorded and kept
> on the server?

It doesn't matter at all if bdb is installed on the clients or not.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org