You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to bugs@apr.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2006/11/22 15:30:33 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28718] - apr_sdbm_lock does not pass the APR_FLOCK_NONBLOCK flag to apr_file_lock

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28718>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28718


wrowe@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From wrowe@apache.org  2006-11-22 06:30 -------
Here's my thought - flock nonblock wasn't supported yet - so beginning with 1.3.0
we apply this patch as a feature of 1.3 family?

Versioning rules allow us to add new facilities in minor (1.X) bumps, while the
removal of features or binary ABI changes require major (2.0) bumps.

A bug fix could be applied to any subversion, but in this case it's a behavior as
opposed to a flaw.  So I'll commit this to trunk this weekend for 1.3.0.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.