M2

[Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>]

Thread name change - new topic..


To add to John's comments... if we are on option 3 (consensus holds 
tomorrow) we should do a M2 with all the other pieces also. like end of 
year time frame. We should include all the meaningful merges and some 
JIRA's, but doubt that any of the next publication of the spec will be 
included as the publication date will be to late to include in this 
version. -- agree again.

In addition to persistence, new code generators, obviously maven, and 
some JMS fixes that can complete should go in.
HA requires the spec update so that will need to be done Q1 with 
protocol update.

Let's plan to start reworking M2 JIRA's later this week
Carl.


John O'Hara wrote:
> If I understand Rob, persistence is looking pretty good.
> So an M2 for Christmas might be worth just persistence and Maven.
> Nailing JMS might be a long piece of string depending on how TCK testing
> goes.  I wouldn't bet on that for Christmas.
>
> M1 - something that works
> M2 - works with persistence, builds purdy
>

Re: M2

[Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>]

Sounds a good way forward - sorry, should've sent my reply to the M1 thread
to this thread :-)

Marnie


On 11/15/06, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thread name change - new topic..
>
>
> To add to John's comments... if we are on option 3 (consensus holds
> tomorrow) we should do a M2 with all the other pieces also. like end of
> year time frame. We should include all the meaningful merges and some
> JIRA's, but doubt that any of the next publication of the spec will be
> included as the publication date will be to late to include in this
> version. -- agree again.
>
> In addition to persistence, new code generators, obviously maven, and
> some JMS fixes that can complete should go in.
> HA requires the spec update so that will need to be done Q1 with
> protocol update.
>
> Let's plan to start reworking M2 JIRA's later this week
> Carl.
>
>
> John O'Hara wrote:
> > If I understand Rob, persistence is looking pretty good.
> > So an M2 for Christmas might be worth just persistence and Maven.
> > Nailing JMS might be a long piece of string depending on how TCK testing
> > goes.  I wouldn't bet on that for Christmas.
> >
> > M1 - something that works
> > M2 - works with persistence, builds purdy
> >
>
>