You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tamaya.apache.org by "Werner Keil (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/12/10 12:40:12 UTC

[jira] [Created] (TAMAYA-22) Do we really need ConfigOperator?

Werner Keil created TAMAYA-22:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Do we really need ConfigOperator?
                 Key: TAMAYA-22
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAMAYA-22
             Project: Tamaya
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: API
    Affects Versions: 0.1-incubating
            Reporter: Werner Keil


As of now using Lambdas (since {{@FunctionalInterface}} and similar types are heavily used) limit the minimal Java version for Tamaya to SE 8. 

Unless this was to change, the {{ConfigOperator}} interface seems rather redundant. Using {{UnaryOperator<Configuration>}} instead would simplify the API and make it more Lambda-friendly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)