You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@apr.apache.org by tr...@apache.org on 2011/03/21 15:13:47 UTC
svn commit: r1083793 - /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/CHANGES
Author: trawick
Date: Mon Mar 21 14:13:47 2011
New Revision: 1083793
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1083793&view=rev
Log:
document a 1.4.0 change in the Windows build
Modified:
apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/CHANGES
Modified: apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/CHANGES
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/CHANGES?rev=1083793&r1=1083792&r2=1083793&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/CHANGES [utf-8] (original)
+++ apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/CHANGES [utf-8] Mon Mar 21 14:13:47 2011
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ Changes for APR 1.4.1
Changes for APR 1.4.0
+ *) Windows: Default build configurations assume NT or higher at run-time;
+ use Release9x/Debug9x build configurations to support Win9x.
+
*) Add apr_global_mutex_lockfile() for retrieving the file, if any,
associated with the mutex. Add apr_global_mutex_name() for retrieving
the name of the lock mechanism used by the underlying proc mutex.
Re: svn commit: r1083793 - /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/CHANGES
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:33 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
<wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On 3/21/2011 9:13 AM, trawick@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Changes for APR 1.4.0
>>
>> + *) Windows: Default build configurations assume NT or higher at run-time;
>> + use Release9x/Debug9x build configurations to support Win9x.
>
> I'd suggest we drop that second line (the first was good). 9x is long dead
> ancient history and we shouldn't imply support.
>
> For that matter, I was expecting to drop 9x from the next apr minor release.
works for me; will edit the CHANGES entry
Re: svn commit: r1083793 - /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/CHANGES
Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On 3/21/2011 9:13 AM, trawick@apache.org wrote:
>
> Changes for APR 1.4.0
>
> + *) Windows: Default build configurations assume NT or higher at run-time;
> + use Release9x/Debug9x build configurations to support Win9x.
I'd suggest we drop that second line (the first was good). 9x is long dead
ancient history and we shouldn't imply support.
For that matter, I was expecting to drop 9x from the next apr minor release.