You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to slide-user@jakarta.apache.org by Eirikur Hrafnsson <ei...@idega.is> on 2005/02/04 16:18:21 UTC
CMS language strategy?
I'm curious to know what strategy other Slide users creating content
management systems have taken in linking together translated version of
the "same" article.
e.g. I write an article in english and then someone does a Swedish
version of it but that is a different file in Slide.
I have thought about using the file names as identifiers e.g. english
version would be called "article_27_EN.article" and the swedish version
"article_27_SE.article".
But is there a "standard" webdav way of handling this "problem"? Or a
best way someone has discovered?
Best Regards
Eirikur S. Hrafnsson, eiki@idega.is
Chief Software Engineer
Idega Software
http://www.idega.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: slide-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: CMS language strategy?
Posted by delbd <de...@oma.be>.
Hello,
we ran into this problem at work because we have multilingual documents
content and multilingual document metadatas, however documents needed to be
manipulated as a whole.
Before using slide we were using a commercial CM. In this commercial CM we
used the following way for multilingual content:
- create an 'empty' document (named metadocument)
- create a multilingual category
- link metadocuments to that category (so we know they are metadocuments)
- add a translation in each language as child docs of the meta documents
- each translation is linked to a language category (FR, NL, EN) (so we know
in which language it's translated)
- generic metadatas were stored in metadocument and translated ones (like
title) were stored in the language document.
This could be achieved with slides (using linknodes) i think.
However, we are thinking about using some other way now, This looks more easy
to do the following:
- when user wants file.pdf, give him file_userlanguage.pdf (file_en.pdf for
english user) or file.pdf if translation does not exist.
- Same thing for metadatas.
This appear to be more consistent with the java localisation of properties
files and easier to manipulate, though we still need a metadocument to
manipulate the publication.
Am opened to discussions about it.
Le Vendredi 4 Février 2005 16:18, Eirikur Hrafnsson a écrit :
> I'm curious to know what strategy other Slide users creating content
> management systems have taken in linking together translated version of
> the "same" article.
> e.g. I write an article in english and then someone does a Swedish
> version of it but that is a different file in Slide.
>
> I have thought about using the file names as identifiers e.g. english
> version would be called "article_27_EN.article" and the swedish version
> "article_27_SE.article".
> But is there a "standard" webdav way of handling this "problem"? Or a
> best way someone has discovered?
>
> Best Regards
>
> Eirikur S. Hrafnsson, eiki@idega.is
> Chief Software Engineer
> Idega Software
> http://www.idega.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: slide-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
--
David Delbecq
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: slide-user-help@jakarta.apache.org