You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2006/11/03 18:45:07 UTC
[Bug 5164] New: Adopt Bob's score-estimation algorithm for sa-update rules
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5164
Summary: Adopt Bob's score-estimation algorithm for sa-update
rules
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: sa-update
AssignedTo: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
ReportedBy: jm@jmason.org
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5164] Adopt Bob's score-estimation algorithm for sa-update rules
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5164
felicity@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.2.0 |Future
------- Additional Comments From felicity@apache.org 2006-12-05 08:08 -------
sa-update is outside the scope of a release, so just move to future. :)
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5164] Adopt Bob's score-estimation algorithm for sa-update rules
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5164
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.2.0
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2006-11-03 09:47 -------
right now, picking scores for sa-update rules is a bit of a "finger in the air"
thing -- not good.
We could use the perceptron, but I'm hesitant to do that every day or two. in
particularly, I can see rules fluctuating back and forth due to chaotic effects;
those aren't a big problem once every N months, but every day -- not so good.
also I don't think it's yet possible to run it safely unattended.
Bob Menschel uses (I think) a freqs-based algorithm for SARE rules -- we should
adopt that (or something similar), I think.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.