You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org> on 2018/05/08 09:53:31 UTC

"system readiness check framework" contribution

Thanks Karl.

Before we push the code to felix, we need to change the namespace.

@all, what do you think the best name should be?
I was thinking:

GID: org.apache.felix
AID: org.apache.felix.systemreadiness
VER: 0.1.0-SNAPSHOT
destination dir: /org.apache.felix.systemreadiness (or just
"systemreadiness" ?)

What do you think? I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name;
suggestions more than welcome.

- Andrei

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:22 PM Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The ip clearance is done.
>
> Andrei, Christian, you can proceed to get the code into Felix.
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Time to call the vote on accepting the "system readiness check
> > framework" contribution by Andrei
> > Dulvac and Christian Schneider.
> >
> > * +1 votes from Neil Bartlett, Karl Pauls, Carsten Ziegeler, Raymond
> > Auge, Pierre De Rop, and David Bosschaert.
> >
> > * No other votes.
> >
> > The vote is successful. I will follow-up with Andrei and Christian and
> > get the ip-clearance started asap.
>
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpauls@gmail.com
>

Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution

Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
Done - added systemready-0.1.0 :)

Best,

David

On 9 May 2018 at 12:57, Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org> wrote:

> David, I'll not settle for the finger and go for the hand :)
> Could I have a systemready-0.1.0  version as well?
>
> - Andrei
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:56 PM Andrei Dulvac <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot!
> >
> > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:51 PM David Bosschaert <
> > david.bosschaert@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Andrei,
> >>
> >> I just added it.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >> On 9 May 2018 at 12:46, Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > "systemready" it is then.
> >> > Can someone help me out with the jira component or make it so that i
> can
> >> > help myself out?
> >> >
> >> > I think we need a "System Ready" component on the project.
> >> >
> >> > - Andrei
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM Christian Schneider <
> >> > chris@die-schneider.net>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I like systemready as it is simpler and describes our desired state.
> >> > >
> >> > > Christian
> >> > >
> >> > > 2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz <
> >> bdelacretaz@apache.org>:
> >> > >
> >> > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac <dulvac@apache.org
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name;
> >> > > > > suggestions more than welcome....
> >> > > >
> >> > > > "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -Bertrand
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > --
> >> > > Christian Schneider
> >> > > http://www.liquid-reality.de
> >> > >
> >> > > Computer Scientist
> >> > > http://www.adobe.com
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution

Posted by Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org>.
David, I'll not settle for the finger and go for the hand :)
Could I have a systemready-0.1.0  version as well?

- Andrei

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:56 PM Andrei Dulvac <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks a lot!
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:51 PM David Bosschaert <
> david.bosschaert@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrei,
>>
>> I just added it.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> David
>>
>> On 9 May 2018 at 12:46, Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > "systemready" it is then.
>> > Can someone help me out with the jira component or make it so that i can
>> > help myself out?
>> >
>> > I think we need a "System Ready" component on the project.
>> >
>> > - Andrei
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM Christian Schneider <
>> > chris@die-schneider.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > I like systemready as it is simpler and describes our desired state.
>> > >
>> > > Christian
>> > >
>> > > 2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz <
>> bdelacretaz@apache.org>:
>> > >
>> > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name;
>> > > > > suggestions more than welcome....
>> > > >
>> > > > "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-)
>> > > >
>> > > > -Bertrand
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > --
>> > > Christian Schneider
>> > > http://www.liquid-reality.de
>> > >
>> > > Computer Scientist
>> > > http://www.adobe.com
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution

Posted by Andrei Dulvac <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks a lot!

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:51 PM David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Andrei,
>
> I just added it.
>
> Best regards,
>
> David
>
> On 9 May 2018 at 12:46, Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > "systemready" it is then.
> > Can someone help me out with the jira component or make it so that i can
> > help myself out?
> >
> > I think we need a "System Ready" component on the project.
> >
> > - Andrei
> >
> > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM Christian Schneider <
> > chris@die-schneider.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I like systemready as it is simpler and describes our desired state.
> > >
> > > Christian
> > >
> > > 2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org
> >:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name;
> > > > > suggestions more than welcome....
> > > >
> > > > "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-)
> > > >
> > > > -Bertrand
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Christian Schneider
> > > http://www.liquid-reality.de
> > >
> > > Computer Scientist
> > > http://www.adobe.com
> > >
> >
>

Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution

Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Andrei,

I just added it.

Best regards,

David

On 9 May 2018 at 12:46, Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org> wrote:

> "systemready" it is then.
> Can someone help me out with the jira component or make it so that i can
> help myself out?
>
> I think we need a "System Ready" component on the project.
>
> - Andrei
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM Christian Schneider <
> chris@die-schneider.net>
> wrote:
>
> > I like systemready as it is simpler and describes our desired state.
> >
> > Christian
> >
> > 2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name;
> > > > suggestions more than welcome....
> > >
> > > "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-)
> > >
> > > -Bertrand
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Christian Schneider
> > http://www.liquid-reality.de
> >
> > Computer Scientist
> > http://www.adobe.com
> >
>

Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution

Posted by Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org>.
"systemready" it is then.
Can someone help me out with the jira component or make it so that i can
help myself out?

I think we need a "System Ready" component on the project.

- Andrei

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>
wrote:

> I like systemready as it is simpler and describes our desired state.
>
> Christian
>
> 2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>:
>
> > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name;
> > > suggestions more than welcome....
> >
> > "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-)
> >
> > -Bertrand
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Computer Scientist
> http://www.adobe.com
>

Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution

Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
I like systemready as it is simpler and describes our desired state.

Christian

2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>:

> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org> wrote:
> > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name;
> > suggestions more than welcome....
>
> "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-)
>
> -Bertrand
>



-- 
-- 
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Computer Scientist
http://www.adobe.com

Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution

Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
+1

I am also open to other names if anyone has a good idea.

Christian

2018-05-08 12:10 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>:

> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org> wrote:
> > ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name;
> > suggestions more than welcome....
>
> "systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-)
>
> -Bertrand
>



-- 
-- 
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Computer Scientist
http://www.adobe.com

Re: "system readiness check framework" contribution

Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Andrei Dulvac <du...@apache.org> wrote:
> ...I'm personally not hung up on the systemreadiness name;
> suggestions more than welcome....

"systemready" might be less likely to be mistyped ;-)

-Bertrand