You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Michael W Thelen <mi...@pietdepsi.com> on 2005/11/08 04:02:52 UTC
Re: [PATCH] svn_load_dirs should check for existing .svn directories
Daniel Rall wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Jay Levitt wrote:
> ...
>
>>That's because I was being -so- careful about the attachment that I sent
>>the patch to myself first, to make sure that Thunderbird's MIME output
>>would be acceptable to the automated patch-seeking scripts. Then I
>>carefully viewed the source of the generated message, and decided it
>>looked OK. So I resent it to the list... without the attachment.
>
>>Here it is now. It doesn't look for _svn; when is that used instead of
>>.svn? My Windows client creates .svn dirs.
It still looks like the patch didn't make it to the list... Jay, I think
you may have sent it just to Daniel. Would you mind resending it to the
list?
--
Michael W Thelen
It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with
potatoes. -- Douglas Adams
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: [PATCH] svn_load_dirs should check for existing .svn directories
Posted by Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com>.
Michael W Thelen wrote:
> Daniel Rall wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Jay Levitt wrote:
>>...
>>
>>
>>>That's because I was being -so- careful about the attachment that I sent
>>>the patch to myself first, to make sure that Thunderbird's MIME output
>>>would be acceptable to the automated patch-seeking scripts. Then I
>>>carefully viewed the source of the generated message, and decided it
>>>looked OK. So I resent it to the list... without the attachment.
>>
>>>Here it is now. It doesn't look for _svn; when is that used instead of
>>>.svn? My Windows client creates .svn dirs.
>
>
> It still looks like the patch didn't make it to the list... Jay, I think
> you may have sent it just to Daniel. Would you mind resending it to the
> list?
I just ran into this bug myself and committed a fix for it in r18549. I'll be
proposing this fix for the 1.3.x branch.
I read this message after I committed the fix, but I don't see the point in
bailing out if .svn or _svn directories exist. My solution just ignores the
.svn and _svn directories.
Regards,
Blair
--
Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
CTO, OrcaWare Technologies
<bl...@orcaware.com>
Subversion training, consulting and support
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org