You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2017/09/06 13:41:00 UTC
[VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
There are many fixes and improvements since the first rc on 27 April 2017, due
to much testing.
List of changes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12339590
36 new Jiras (out of 51) since rc1; to see, sort by key and looke at UIMA-5407
and newer.
The v3 users guide has many updates and corrections.
Maven artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1154
Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/artifacts/
Eclipse update site (no need to download, just use this as the link in Eclipse's
install):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
mvn clean install svn tag - OK
mvn clean install source-release - OK
spot checked sigs - OK
spot checked notes and friends - OK
tested plugins in Eclispe Oxygen - OK
problems with compile-level compatibility (see previous mails) - not a
blocker
tested ruta-v3 with staged artefacts - OK
[ X] +1 OK to release
Peter
Am 06.09.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
>
> There are many fixes and improvements since the first rc on 27 April 2017, due
> to much testing.
>
> List of changes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12339590
> 36 new Jiras (out of 51) since rc1; to see, sort by key and looke at UIMA-5407
> and newer.
>
> The v3 users guide has many updates and corrections.
>
> Maven artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1154
>
> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/artifacts/
>
> Eclipse update site (no need to download, just use this as the link in Eclipse's
> install):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>
> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE][CANCEL] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
cancelling this to address the issues found by Richard and Peter.
Thanks for testing!
-Marshall
On 9/6/2017 9:41 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
>
> There are many fixes and improvements since the first rc on 27 April 2017, due
> to much testing.
>
> List of changes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12339590
> 36 new Jiras (out of 51) since rc1; to see, sort by key and looke at UIMA-5407
> and newer.
>
> The v3 users guide has many updates and corrections.
>
> Maven artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1154
>
> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/artifacts/
>
> Eclipse update site (no need to download, just use this as the link in Eclipse's
> install):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>
> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
happy to address all issues you find in testing! I don't see a benefit in
voting it through early.
Thanks for all the testing - that's just what it needs :-)
-Marshall
On 9/8/2017 9:15 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> On 06.09.2017, at 16:41, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
> So finally I have set up a DKPro Core branch to build against UIMAv3 and also updated
> the uimaFIT v3 branch to build again.
>
> Doing so, I found a couple of things and have opened issues for them.
>
> We could vote through the beta despite known issues of course in an attempt to
> get further exposure and feedback. Or would you prefer to address internally-detected
> issues first?
>
> Best,
>
> -- Richard
>
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
On 06.09.2017, at 16:41, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
So finally I have set up a DKPro Core branch to build against UIMAv3 and also updated
the uimaFIT v3 branch to build again.
Doing so, I found a couple of things and have opened issues for them.
We could vote through the beta despite known issues of course in an attempt to
get further exposure and feedback. Or would you prefer to address internally-detected
issues first?
Best,
-- Richard
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
I will be cancelling the vote, but would encourage everyone to post about any
issues and/or difficulties they are finding in this candidate.
-Marshall
On 9/6/2017 9:41 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
>
> There are many fixes and improvements since the first rc on 27 April 2017, due
> to much testing.
>
> List of changes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12339590
> 36 new Jiras (out of 51) since rc1; to see, sort by key and looke at UIMA-5407
> and newer.
>
> The v3 users guide has many updates and corrections.
>
> Maven artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1154
>
> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/artifacts/
>
> Eclipse update site (no need to download, just use this as the link in Eclipse's
> install):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>
> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
signatures ok
install into Eclipse (Oxygen), run Component Descriptor, jcasgen: OK
run documentAnalyzer from bin distr, view results: OK
compare source release with tag: OK
issues fixed: 5 issues in category like Duplicate, not a problem, done, etc. 51
issues in Jira web page, 46 in jira report, OK
api compare report: OK (it's easier to review the non-html version, e.g.
japicmp.diff )
build from sources: OK
Dependencies: only change is new versions of procyon compilertools and core,
both under Apache license 2.0, available from maven central
License and Notice: no change from 3.0.0-beta-rc1.
[X] +1 OK to release
- -Marshall Schor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (MingW32)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=YbJj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
actually, I'm adding this to the FSIteratorImplBase class, so it's just a
regular method.
-Marshall
On 9/9/2017 10:33 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> I'll make this new getter on the API a "default method", which should get rid of
> the compile errors.
>
> Thanks! -Marshall
>
> P.S., the quick overview of v3:
>
> 1) FSs are Java objects, can be garbage collected when no longer referenced.
>
> 2) Iterators no longer throw ConcurrentModificationException - the iterators use
> a lazy copy-on-write technique to continue iterating over the unmodified state
> of the index (although that can be reset by using moveToFirst/Last/FS).
>
> 3) Using special JCas classes you can effectively put any Java object into the
> CAS. This is used for 3 new semi-built-in types:
> - FSArrayList (like FSArray, but adjustible, like Java ArrayList
> - FSHashSet
> - IntegerArrayList - like ArrayList, but holds ints
>
> 4) New logging setup, defaults to old one, but allows slf4j and its connection
> to many alternative loggers
>
> 5) new "select" api allowing comprehensive iterator/stream ops on Uima indexes,
> with support for
> - ignoring typeOrdering (the default)
> - coveredBy, covering
> - many other options (inspired by uimaFIT)
>
> 6) Lots of new APIs integrate with new Java 8 constructs. UIMA Logger supports
> lambda values to allow deferring log message construction unless needed.
> Indexes support Iterable.
>
> 7) performance seems better, but likely depends on particular kinds of use.
>
> 8) except for needed regenerated or migrated JCas classes (migration tool
> provided), should be backwards compatible.
>
>
> On 9/8/2017 3:02 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> I think the problem was caused by a bug in the old beta rc and the jar
>> was not replaced by the staged artifact.
>>
>>
>> Now, I face compile errors because I have two classes that extend the
>> old FSIteratorImplBase but do not implement the getter on the comparator
>> yet. Should we take care of some sort of backward-compatability on
>> compile level here? (I don't know)
>>
>>
>> I must admit that I lost the overview of all the changes in v3. A lot to
>> catch up on...
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> Am 07.09.2017 um 21:06 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>> ok, let me know if I can help... -Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/7/2017 11:29 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Ah wait, I still have some version problems. The staged-release build
>>>> did not work as expected.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 07.09.2017 um 17:19 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>> Ok, this is really strange.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are two annotations of type "Struct" in the CAS (variables view
>>>>> say so). The first time I call cas.getAnnotationIndex(type) only one is
>>>>> returned (I am using the iterable). If I "drop to frame" and call the
>>>>> method again, two are returned. This behavior seems to be repeated for
>>>>> every other rule in this test.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Could it be that I corrupted the index somehow and it recovers by itself
>>>>> for a second call?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Some help would be really appreciated. I can provide specific steps how
>>>>> to reproduce it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 07.09.2017 um 17:03 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I finally set up some ruta-v3 version (right now for testing the rc).
>>>>>> One test is failing caused by some strange inconsistent matching behavior.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... investigating ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS: I put it in the uv3 folder if that's ok.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 06.09.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are many fixes and improvements since the first rc on 27 April 2017, due
>>>>>>> to much testing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> List of changes:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12339590
>>>>>>> 36 new Jiras (out of 51) since rc1; to see, sort by key and looke at UIMA-5407
>>>>>>> and newer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The v3 users guide has many updates and corrections.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1154
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/artifacts/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eclipse update site (no need to download, just use this as the link in Eclipse's
>>>>>>> install):
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
I'll make this new getter on the API a "default method", which should get rid of
the compile errors.
Thanks! -Marshall
P.S., the quick overview of v3:
1) FSs are Java objects, can be garbage collected when no longer referenced.
2) Iterators no longer throw ConcurrentModificationException - the iterators use
a lazy copy-on-write technique to continue iterating over the unmodified state
of the index (although that can be reset by using moveToFirst/Last/FS).
3) Using special JCas classes you can effectively put any Java object into the
CAS. This is used for 3 new semi-built-in types:
- FSArrayList (like FSArray, but adjustible, like Java ArrayList
- FSHashSet
- IntegerArrayList - like ArrayList, but holds ints
4) New logging setup, defaults to old one, but allows slf4j and its connection
to many alternative loggers
5) new "select" api allowing comprehensive iterator/stream ops on Uima indexes,
with support for
- ignoring typeOrdering (the default)
- coveredBy, covering
- many other options (inspired by uimaFIT)
6) Lots of new APIs integrate with new Java 8 constructs. UIMA Logger supports
lambda values to allow deferring log message construction unless needed.
Indexes support Iterable.
7) performance seems better, but likely depends on particular kinds of use.
8) except for needed regenerated or migrated JCas classes (migration tool
provided), should be backwards compatible.
On 9/8/2017 3:02 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> I think the problem was caused by a bug in the old beta rc and the jar
> was not replaced by the staged artifact.
>
>
> Now, I face compile errors because I have two classes that extend the
> old FSIteratorImplBase but do not implement the getter on the comparator
> yet. Should we take care of some sort of backward-compatability on
> compile level here? (I don't know)
>
>
> I must admit that I lost the overview of all the changes in v3. A lot to
> catch up on...
>
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
> Am 07.09.2017 um 21:06 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> ok, let me know if I can help... -Marshall
>>
>>
>> On 9/7/2017 11:29 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Ah wait, I still have some version problems. The staged-release build
>>> did not work as expected.
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 07.09.2017 um 17:19 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>> Ok, this is really strange.
>>>>
>>>> There are two annotations of type "Struct" in the CAS (variables view
>>>> say so). The first time I call cas.getAnnotationIndex(type) only one is
>>>> returned (I am using the iterable). If I "drop to frame" and call the
>>>> method again, two are returned. This behavior seems to be repeated for
>>>> every other rule in this test.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could it be that I corrupted the index somehow and it recovers by itself
>>>> for a second call?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Some help would be really appreciated. I can provide specific steps how
>>>> to reproduce it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 07.09.2017 um 17:03 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I finally set up some ruta-v3 version (right now for testing the rc).
>>>>> One test is failing caused by some strange inconsistent matching behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ... investigating ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> PS: I put it in the uv3 folder if that's ok.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 06.09.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are many fixes and improvements since the first rc on 27 April 2017, due
>>>>>> to much testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> List of changes:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12339590
>>>>>> 36 new Jiras (out of 51) since rc1; to see, sort by key and looke at UIMA-5407
>>>>>> and newer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The v3 users guide has many updates and corrections.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1154
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/artifacts/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eclipse update site (no need to download, just use this as the link in Eclipse's
>>>>>> install):
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Hi,
Yes, the newer Iterator/ListIterator stuff will allow some nice
improvements in ruta, I think :-)
The first class that implemented FSIteratorImplBase is
org.apache.uima.ruta.RutaStream.
There is actually no reason now why it has to implement it, and I also
removed it in ruta-v3. The class is on top of my todo list and will be
reimplemented when I find the time. It implemented the iterator for
legacy/historical reasons. The version of textmarker (ruta) before it
was adapted to UIMA used this class as some sort of filtered iterator on
annotations. Therefore I chose to implement the UIMA iterator when I
migrated it to UIMA. (My UIMA knowledge was quite limited in 2007)
The second class is org.apache.uima.ruta.rule.AnnotationListFSIterator.
This class is a mock of an iterator based on a simple list of annotations.
The wildcard rule element operates on an FSIterator in order to identify
the match of the next rule element in order to determine its own match
range. If the next rule element macthes on an a FSArray feature of an
annotation, I need some wrapper class fulfilling the FSIterator
interface based on a list (FSArray). I think I will refactor the code
using the ListIterator interface in future. Right now,
AnnotationListFSIterator implements the remaining methods with a
NotImplementedException.
So, its all fine from the ruta side.
Best,
Peter
Am 08.09.2017 um 22:18 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> I'm curious whether the newer iterator things in v3 address the use case you
> extended FSIteratorImplBase for. Can you point to some code that is doing this
> extension or some other info about it?
>
> Thanks. -Marshall
>
>
> On 9/8/2017 3:02 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> I think the problem was caused by a bug in the old beta rc and the jar
>> was not replaced by the staged artifact.
>>
>>
>> Now, I face compile errors because I have two classes that extend the
>> old FSIteratorImplBase but do not implement the getter on the comparator
>> yet. Should we take care of some sort of backward-compatability on
>> compile level here? (I don't know)
>>
>>
>> I must admit that I lost the overview of all the changes in v3. A lot to
>> catch up on...
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> Am 07.09.2017 um 21:06 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>> ok, let me know if I can help... -Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/7/2017 11:29 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Ah wait, I still have some version problems. The staged-release build
>>>> did not work as expected.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 07.09.2017 um 17:19 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>> Ok, this is really strange.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are two annotations of type "Struct" in the CAS (variables view
>>>>> say so). The first time I call cas.getAnnotationIndex(type) only one is
>>>>> returned (I am using the iterable). If I "drop to frame" and call the
>>>>> method again, two are returned. This behavior seems to be repeated for
>>>>> every other rule in this test.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Could it be that I corrupted the index somehow and it recovers by itself
>>>>> for a second call?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Some help would be really appreciated. I can provide specific steps how
>>>>> to reproduce it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 07.09.2017 um 17:03 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I finally set up some ruta-v3 version (right now for testing the rc).
>>>>>> One test is failing caused by some strange inconsistent matching behavior.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... investigating ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS: I put it in the uv3 folder if that's ok.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 06.09.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are many fixes and improvements since the first rc on 27 April 2017, due
>>>>>>> to much testing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> List of changes:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12339590
>>>>>>> 36 new Jiras (out of 51) since rc1; to see, sort by key and looke at UIMA-5407
>>>>>>> and newer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The v3 users guide has many updates and corrections.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1154
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/artifacts/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eclipse update site (no need to download, just use this as the link in Eclipse's
>>>>>>> install):
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
I'm curious whether the newer iterator things in v3 address the use case you
extended FSIteratorImplBase for. Can you point to some code that is doing this
extension or some other info about it?
Thanks. -Marshall
On 9/8/2017 3:02 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> I think the problem was caused by a bug in the old beta rc and the jar
> was not replaced by the staged artifact.
>
>
> Now, I face compile errors because I have two classes that extend the
> old FSIteratorImplBase but do not implement the getter on the comparator
> yet. Should we take care of some sort of backward-compatability on
> compile level here? (I don't know)
>
>
> I must admit that I lost the overview of all the changes in v3. A lot to
> catch up on...
>
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
> Am 07.09.2017 um 21:06 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> ok, let me know if I can help... -Marshall
>>
>>
>> On 9/7/2017 11:29 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Ah wait, I still have some version problems. The staged-release build
>>> did not work as expected.
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 07.09.2017 um 17:19 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>> Ok, this is really strange.
>>>>
>>>> There are two annotations of type "Struct" in the CAS (variables view
>>>> say so). The first time I call cas.getAnnotationIndex(type) only one is
>>>> returned (I am using the iterable). If I "drop to frame" and call the
>>>> method again, two are returned. This behavior seems to be repeated for
>>>> every other rule in this test.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could it be that I corrupted the index somehow and it recovers by itself
>>>> for a second call?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Some help would be really appreciated. I can provide specific steps how
>>>> to reproduce it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 07.09.2017 um 17:03 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I finally set up some ruta-v3 version (right now for testing the rc).
>>>>> One test is failing caused by some strange inconsistent matching behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ... investigating ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> PS: I put it in the uv3 folder if that's ok.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 06.09.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are many fixes and improvements since the first rc on 27 April 2017, due
>>>>>> to much testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> List of changes:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12339590
>>>>>> 36 new Jiras (out of 51) since rc1; to see, sort by key and looke at UIMA-5407
>>>>>> and newer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The v3 users guide has many updates and corrections.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1154
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/artifacts/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eclipse update site (no need to download, just use this as the link in Eclipse's
>>>>>> install):
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
I think the problem was caused by a bug in the old beta rc and the jar
was not replaced by the staged artifact.
Now, I face compile errors because I have two classes that extend the
old FSIteratorImplBase but do not implement the getter on the comparator
yet. Should we take care of some sort of backward-compatability on
compile level here? (I don't know)
I must admit that I lost the overview of all the changes in v3. A lot to
catch up on...
Best,
Peter
Am 07.09.2017 um 21:06 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> ok, let me know if I can help... -Marshall
>
>
> On 9/7/2017 11:29 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Ah wait, I still have some version problems. The staged-release build
>> did not work as expected.
>>
>>
>> Am 07.09.2017 um 17:19 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>> Ok, this is really strange.
>>>
>>> There are two annotations of type "Struct" in the CAS (variables view
>>> say so). The first time I call cas.getAnnotationIndex(type) only one is
>>> returned (I am using the iterable). If I "drop to frame" and call the
>>> method again, two are returned. This behavior seems to be repeated for
>>> every other rule in this test.
>>>
>>>
>>> Could it be that I corrupted the index somehow and it recovers by itself
>>> for a second call?
>>>
>>>
>>> Some help would be really appreciated. I can provide specific steps how
>>> to reproduce it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 07.09.2017 um 17:03 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I finally set up some ruta-v3 version (right now for testing the rc).
>>>> One test is failing caused by some strange inconsistent matching behavior.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ... investigating ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PS: I put it in the uv3 folder if that's ok.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 06.09.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are many fixes and improvements since the first rc on 27 April 2017, due
>>>>> to much testing.
>>>>>
>>>>> List of changes:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12339590
>>>>> 36 new Jiras (out of 51) since rc1; to see, sort by key and looke at UIMA-5407
>>>>> and newer.
>>>>>
>>>>> The v3 users guide has many updates and corrections.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1154
>>>>>
>>>>> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/artifacts/
>>>>>
>>>>> Eclipse update site (no need to download, just use this as the link in Eclipse's
>>>>> install):
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>>>>>
>>>>> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
ok, let me know if I can help... -Marshall
On 9/7/2017 11:29 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Ah wait, I still have some version problems. The staged-release build
> did not work as expected.
>
>
> Am 07.09.2017 um 17:19 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>> Ok, this is really strange.
>>
>> There are two annotations of type "Struct" in the CAS (variables view
>> say so). The first time I call cas.getAnnotationIndex(type) only one is
>> returned (I am using the iterable). If I "drop to frame" and call the
>> method again, two are returned. This behavior seems to be repeated for
>> every other rule in this test.
>>
>>
>> Could it be that I corrupted the index somehow and it recovers by itself
>> for a second call?
>>
>>
>> Some help would be really appreciated. I can provide specific steps how
>> to reproduce it.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 07.09.2017 um 17:03 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> I finally set up some ruta-v3 version (right now for testing the rc).
>>> One test is failing caused by some strange inconsistent matching behavior.
>>>
>>>
>>> ... investigating ...
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> PS: I put it in the uv3 folder if that's ok.
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 06.09.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
>>>>
>>>> There are many fixes and improvements since the first rc on 27 April 2017, due
>>>> to much testing.
>>>>
>>>> List of changes:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12339590
>>>> 36 new Jiras (out of 51) since rc1; to see, sort by key and looke at UIMA-5407
>>>> and newer.
>>>>
>>>> The v3 users guide has many updates and corrections.
>>>>
>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1154
>>>>
>>>> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/artifacts/
>>>>
>>>> Eclipse update site (no need to download, just use this as the link in Eclipse's
>>>> install):
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>>>>
>>>> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Ah wait, I still have some version problems. The staged-release build
did not work as expected.
Am 07.09.2017 um 17:19 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> Ok, this is really strange.
>
> There are two annotations of type "Struct" in the CAS (variables view
> say so). The first time I call cas.getAnnotationIndex(type) only one is
> returned (I am using the iterable). If I "drop to frame" and call the
> method again, two are returned. This behavior seems to be repeated for
> every other rule in this test.
>
>
> Could it be that I corrupted the index somehow and it recovers by itself
> for a second call?
>
>
> Some help would be really appreciated. I can provide specific steps how
> to reproduce it.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 07.09.2017 um 17:03 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I finally set up some ruta-v3 version (right now for testing the rc).
>> One test is failing caused by some strange inconsistent matching behavior.
>>
>>
>> ... investigating ...
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> PS: I put it in the uv3 folder if that's ok.
>>
>>
>> Am 06.09.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
>>>
>>> There are many fixes and improvements since the first rc on 27 April 2017, due
>>> to much testing.
>>>
>>> List of changes:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12339590
>>> 36 new Jiras (out of 51) since rc1; to see, sort by key and looke at UIMA-5407
>>> and newer.
>>>
>>> The v3 users guide has many updates and corrections.
>>>
>>> Maven artifacts:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1154
>>>
>>> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/artifacts/
>>>
>>> Eclipse update site (no need to download, just use this as the link in Eclipse's
>>> install):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>>>
>>> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>>>
>>> Please vote on release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Ok, this is really strange.
There are two annotations of type "Struct" in the CAS (variables view
say so). The first time I call cas.getAnnotationIndex(type) only one is
returned (I am using the iterable). If I "drop to frame" and call the
method again, two are returned. This behavior seems to be repeated for
every other rule in this test.
Could it be that I corrupted the index somehow and it recovers by itself
for a second call?
Some help would be really appreciated. I can provide specific steps how
to reproduce it.
Best,
Peter
Am 07.09.2017 um 17:03 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> Hi,
>
>
> I finally set up some ruta-v3 version (right now for testing the rc).
> One test is failing caused by some strange inconsistent matching behavior.
>
>
> ... investigating ...
>
>
> Best,
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> PS: I put it in the uv3 folder if that's ok.
>
>
> Am 06.09.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
>>
>> There are many fixes and improvements since the first rc on 27 April 2017, due
>> to much testing.
>>
>> List of changes:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12339590
>> 36 new Jiras (out of 51) since rc1; to see, sort by key and looke at UIMA-5407
>> and newer.
>>
>> The v3 users guide has many updates and corrections.
>>
>> Maven artifacts:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1154
>>
>> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/artifacts/
>>
>> Eclipse update site (no need to download, just use this as the link in Eclipse's
>> install):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>>
>> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>>
>> Please vote on release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 3.0.0 beta rc2
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Hi,
I finally set up some ruta-v3 version (right now for testing the rc).
One test is failing caused by some strange inconsistent matching behavior.
... investigating ...
Best,
Peter
PS: I put it in the uv3 folder if that's ok.
Am 06.09.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> Here's RC2 for uimaj-sdk 3.0.0-beta.
>
> There are many fixes and improvements since the first rc on 27 April 2017, due
> to much testing.
>
> List of changes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12339590
> 36 new Jiras (out of 51) since rc1; to see, sort by key and looke at UIMA-5407
> and newer.
>
> The v3 users guide has many updates and corrections.
>
> Maven artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1154
>
> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/artifacts/
>
> Eclipse update site (no need to download, just use this as the link in Eclipse's
> install):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-beta-rc2/uimaj-v3-pre-production/
>
> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0-beta/
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>