[jira] [Commented] (TAP5-1894) Rosetta Stone

["Lance (Commented) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13246172#comment-13246172 ] 

Lance commented on TAP5-1894:
-----------------------------

A few more:
5) ActionLink vs EventLink
6) Annotations vs naming conventions
7) Constructor injection vs field injection
                
> Rosetta Stone
> -------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-1894
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1894
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: documentation
>            Reporter: Chris Mylonas
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: documentation
>
> There are equivalent ways for doing numerous things in Tapestry 5.
> An equivalence table, or rosetta stone, or icon that links "tagged" features within the documentation would be a treat for new to intermediate developers.  A double rainbow or double unicorn for giggles.
> For example:
> 1)  @Property bindings within the template, or in the page's java class file.
> 2)  contributeApplicationDefaults VS command line parameters / symbols
> 3)  component templating (MarkupWriter element&end/writeRaw VS .tml VS streamResponse)
> 4)  JS & CSS inclusions within .tml files or in java classes.  Further, inclusion of contexts versus relative
> I've read the above 4 examples time and again over the last 12 months as I've part-timed my way through Tapestry deving, but it's just not that easy to find what I'm looking for in a quick enough time.
> Cheers
> Chris

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira