You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Dirk Rudolph (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/12/22 11:07:01 UTC

[jira] [Created] (OAK-7109) rep:facet returns wrong results for complex queries

Dirk Rudolph created OAK-7109:
---------------------------------

             Summary: rep:facet returns wrong results for complex queries
                 Key: OAK-7109
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109
             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: lucene
    Affects Versions: 1.6.7
            Reporter: Dirk Rudolph


Complex queries in that case are queries, which are passed to lucene not containing all original constraints. For example queries with multiple path restrictions like:

{code}
select [rep:facet(simple/tags)] from [nt:base] as a where contains(a.[*], 'ipsum') and (isdescendantnode(a,'/content1') or isdescendantnode(a,'/content2'))
{code}

In that particular case the index planer gives ":fulltext:ipsum" to lucene even though the index supports evaluating path constraints. 

As counting the facets happens on the raw result of lucene, the returned facets are incorrect. For example having the following content 

{code}
/content1/test/foo
 + text = lorem ipsum
 - simple/
  + tags = tag1, tag2
/content2/test/bar
 + text = lorem ipsum
 - simple/
  + tags = tag1, tag2
/content1/test/bar
 + text = lorem ipsum
 - simple/
   + tags = tag1, tag2
{code}

the expected result for the dimensions of simple/tags and the query above is 
- tag1: 2
- tag2: 2

as the result set is 2 results long and all documents are equal. The actual result set is 
- tag1: 3
- tag2: 3

as the path constraint is not handled by lucene.

To workaround that the only solution that came to my mind is building the DNF of my complex query and executing a query for each of the disjunctive statements. As this is expanding exponentially its only a theoretical solution, nothing for production. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)