Re:Re: [DISCUSS] Details of the feature "Provider a docker im

[zhangke <zh...@foxmail.com>]

Thanks for the suggestion that server use JDK7. I forgot JDK6 just for client.

About images, two is ok. First is for namesrv,broker and console. Different command will be used. This image is preparing for deploy them on seperate physical node. Second image is built by docker-compose to start the three components by just one command. It's for develop or test environment mainly to start the whole system more quick and easy. Now i am not sure if docker officcial accepts compose.

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "yukon" <yu...@apache.org>;
发送时间: 2017年3月15日(星期三) 11:07
收件人: "dev" <de...@rocketmq.incubator.apache.org>;
主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Details of the feature "Provider a docker image for RocketMQ"



Hi Rick,

Thanks for your interest in this feature.

For server, JDK7+ is better, only client supports JDK6.

About the second and third points, Do you mean provide 4 docker images,
three separate docker images for namesrv/broker/console, while the last is
a all-in-one docker image?

Regards,
yukon

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks, please let me know after you put the original project into new git
> external repository.
>
> 2017-03-15 9:59 GMT+08:00 Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>:
>
> > Cool ~
> >
> >
> > In fact, the docker image has been existence since 3.2.6. But there is
> > some work to be done, hoping to polish it continuously. We can host it in
> > our new git external repository.
> >
> >
> > > 在 2017年3月14日，22:24，Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com> 写道：
> > >
> > > 4. After docker file reviewed by RocketMQ Team, it's better to submit a
> > PR
> >
> >
>

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Details of the feature "Provider a docker im

[yukon <yu...@apache.org>]

Cool~

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:20 AM, zhangke <zh...@foxmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for the suggestion that server use JDK7. I forgot JDK6 just for
> client.
>
> About images, two is ok. First is for namesrv,broker and console.
> Different command will be used. This image is preparing for deploy them on
> seperate physical node. Second image is built by docker-compose to start
> the three components by just one command. It's for develop or test
> environment mainly to start the whole system more quick and easy. Now i am
> not sure if docker officcial accepts compose.
>
> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
> *发件人:* "yukon" <yu...@apache.org>;
> *发送时间:* 2017年3月15日(星期三) 11:07
> *收件人:* "dev" <de...@rocketmq.incubator.apache.org>;
> *主题:* Re: [DISCUSS] Details of the feature "Provider a docker image for
> RocketMQ"
>
>
> Hi Rick,
>
> Thanks for your interest in this feature.
>
> For server, JDK7+ is better, only client supports JDK6.
>
> About the second and third points, Do you mean provide 4 docker images,
> three separate docker images for namesrv/broker/console, while the last is
> a all-in-one docker image?
>
> Regards,
> yukon
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, please let me know after you put the original project into new
> git
> > external repository.
> >
> > 2017-03-15 9:59 GMT+08:00 Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Cool ~
> > >
> > >
> > > In fact, the docker image has been existence since 3.2.6. But there is
> > > some work to be done, hoping to polish it continuously. We can host it
> in
> > > our new git external repository.
> > >
> > >
> > > > 在 2017年3月14日，22:24，Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com> 写道：
> > > >
> > > > 4. After docker file reviewed by RocketMQ Team, it's better to
> submit a
> > > PR
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>