Logging

[Martin <ma...@apache.org>]

Hi,

there are different logging frameworks used in archiva (log4j2) and redback 
(slf4j).

I use slf4j not very frequently. Where can I change the logging (especially 
for testing) of the redback components. I didn't find the config file.

Doesn't it make sense to switch all to log4j2 and use the slf4j layer (so wie 
do not have to change the code in one). Or are there special reasons that 
prevents the move to log4j2?

Greetings

Martin

Re: Logging

[Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>]

On 2 October 2016 at 06:21, Martin <ma...@apache.org> wrote:

> Ok, I think I understand now.
> For redback, the slf4j-simple dependencies are only in test scope, and the
> slf4j api is a dependency in the standard scope.
>
> There is one project in redback that uses the log4j2-slf4j-Binding (log4j-
> slf4j-simple) and not the slf4j-simple dependency in the test scope
> (redback-
> rest-services). Are there reasons against doing this? I would like to do
> the
> same in the jpa projects.
>

No real reasons.
Feel free to change that if you prefer!


>
> Greetings
>
> martin
>
>
> Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016, 10:40:34 CEST schrieb Olivier Lamy:
> > Hi
> > The main used framework is slf4j (as a logging api) then the slf4j
> > implementation we use is log4j2.
> > For unit testing in redback, I think is slf4j-simple as redback is an api
> > we do not provide any default impl with the jars (users can choose their
> > own impl).
> > For Archiva, as we provide an application we provide a default logging as
> > well (log4j2)
> > Makes sense for you?
> >
> > On 1 October 2016 at 06:10, Martin <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > there are different logging frameworks used in archiva (log4j2) and
> > > redback
> > > (slf4j).
> > >
> > > I use slf4j not very frequently. Where can I change the logging
> > > (especially
> > > for testing) of the redback components. I didn't find the config file.
> > >
> > > Doesn't it make sense to switch all to log4j2 and use the slf4j layer
> (so
> > > wie
> > > do not have to change the code in one). Or are there special reasons
> that
> > > prevents the move to log4j2?
> > >
> > > Greetings
> > >
> > > Martin
>
>
>


-- 
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

Re: Logging

[Martin <ma...@apache.org>]

Ok, I think I understand now. 
For redback, the slf4j-simple dependencies are only in test scope, and the 
slf4j api is a dependency in the standard scope.

There is one project in redback that uses the log4j2-slf4j-Binding (log4j-
slf4j-simple) and not the slf4j-simple dependency in the test scope (redback-
rest-services). Are there reasons against doing this? I would like to do the 
same in the jpa projects. 

Greetings 

martin


Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016, 10:40:34 CEST schrieb Olivier Lamy:
> Hi
> The main used framework is slf4j (as a logging api) then the slf4j
> implementation we use is log4j2.
> For unit testing in redback, I think is slf4j-simple as redback is an api
> we do not provide any default impl with the jars (users can choose their
> own impl).
> For Archiva, as we provide an application we provide a default logging as
> well (log4j2)
> Makes sense for you?
> 
> On 1 October 2016 at 06:10, Martin <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > there are different logging frameworks used in archiva (log4j2) and
> > redback
> > (slf4j).
> > 
> > I use slf4j not very frequently. Where can I change the logging
> > (especially
> > for testing) of the redback components. I didn't find the config file.
> > 
> > Doesn't it make sense to switch all to log4j2 and use the slf4j layer (so
> > wie
> > do not have to change the code in one). Or are there special reasons that
> > prevents the move to log4j2?
> > 
> > Greetings
> > 
> > Martin

Re: Logging

[Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>]

Hi
The main used framework is slf4j (as a logging api) then the slf4j
implementation we use is log4j2.
For unit testing in redback, I think is slf4j-simple as redback is an api
we do not provide any default impl with the jars (users can choose their
own impl).
For Archiva, as we provide an application we provide a default logging as
well (log4j2)
Makes sense for you?



On 1 October 2016 at 06:10, Martin <ma...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> there are different logging frameworks used in archiva (log4j2) and redback
> (slf4j).
>
> I use slf4j not very frequently. Where can I change the logging (especially
> for testing) of the redback components. I didn't find the config file.
>
> Doesn't it make sense to switch all to log4j2 and use the slf4j layer (so
> wie
> do not have to change the code in one). Or are there special reasons that
> prevents the move to log4j2?
>
> Greetings
>
> Martin
>
>


-- 
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy