You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user-java@ibatis.apache.org by Nathan Maves <Na...@Sun.COM> on 2005/07/20 23:37:30 UTC
.Net vs Java
How is the team managing these two projects?
Do they use the same code base?
Can we expect the same functionality from both?
Nathan
Re: .Net vs Java
Posted by Larry Meadors <la...@gmail.com>.
...and hopefully get the xml formats closer. ;-)
On 7/21/05, Clinton Begin <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I expect we'll start discussing iBATIS 3.0 sometime in September. At that
> time, we can consolodate features, design and also align the version
> numbers.
>
> Cheers,
> Clinton
>
>
> On 7/20/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The .NET and Java version don't followed the same roadmap as the .NET is
> younger than Java but .NET team expect to reach the same level of
> fonctionnality of the Java version.
> > The .NET version as its beginning was based on the first version of
> iBATIS.Java (which it is the current version at this time) and 2/3 months
> latter Clinton introduced the version 2 of iBATIS.Java :-!.
> > Since this time, the .NET version have been refactoring in a transparent
> way to introduce the fonctionnalities of iBATIS.Java V2 and we continue.
> >
> > DataAccess 1.6.1 GA == mixed of Java DAO V1 and V2
> > .NET DataMapper 1.2.1 GA == Java Data Mapper V2 without all the
> fonctionnalities
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/20/05, Nathan Maves <Nathan.Maves@sun.com > wrote:
> > > Do they follow the same road map?
> > >
> > > Are the following statements true?
> > >
> > > .NET DataMapper 1.2.1 == Java Data Mapper
> > > DataAccess 1.6.1 Beta! == Java DAO
> > >
> > > If so why not use a standard naming convention?
> > >
> > > Wow I am really on a rant today :)
> > >
> > > Nathan
> > > On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:49 PM, Larry Meadors wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 7/20/05, Nathan Maves < Nathan.Maves@sun.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> How is the team managing these two projects?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Pretty well. ;-) Kidding aside, their are two teams with a tiny bit of
> > > > overlap..I know Ron and I both use both versions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Do they use the same code base?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Nope, they are totally independent.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Can we expect the same functionality from both?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Not identical, but *very* similar.
> > > >
> > > > Larry
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: .Net vs Java
Posted by Clinton Begin <cl...@gmail.com>.
I expect we'll start discussing iBATIS 3.0 sometime in September. At that
time, we can consolodate features, design and also align the version
numbers.
Cheers,
Clinton
On 7/20/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The .NET and Java version don't followed the same roadmap as the .NET is
> younger than Java but .NET team expect to reach the same level of
> fonctionnality of the Java version.
> The .NET version as its beginning was based on the first version of
> iBATIS.Java (which it is the current version at this time) and 2/3 months
> latter Clinton introduced the version 2 of iBATIS.Java :-!.
> Since this time, the .NET version have been refactoring in a transparent
> way to introduce the fonctionnalities of iBATIS.Java V2 and we continue.
> DataAccess 1.6.1 GA == mixed of Java DAO V1 and V2
> .NET DataMapper 1.2.1 GA == Java Data Mapper V2 without all the
> fonctionnalities
>
> On 7/20/05, Nathan Maves <Na...@sun.com> wrote:
> >
> > Do they follow the same road map?
> >
> > Are the following statements true?
> >
> > .NET DataMapper 1.2.1 == Java Data Mapper
> > DataAccess 1.6.1 Beta! == Java DAO
> >
> > If so why not use a standard naming convention?
> >
> > Wow I am really on a rant today :)
> >
> > Nathan
> > On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:49 PM, Larry Meadors wrote:
> >
> > > On 7/20/05, Nathan Maves < Nathan.Maves@sun.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> How is the team managing these two projects?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Pretty well. ;-) Kidding aside, their are two teams with a tiny bit of
> >
> > > overlap..I know Ron and I both use both versions.
> > >
> > >
> > >> Do they use the same code base?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Nope, they are totally independent.
> > >
> > >
> > >> Can we expect the same functionality from both?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Not identical, but *very* similar.
> > >
> > > Larry
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: .Net vs Java
Posted by Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com>.
The .NET and Java version don't followed the same roadmap as the .NET is
younger than Java but .NET team expect to reach the same level of
fonctionnality of the Java version.
The .NET version as its beginning was based on the first version of
iBATIS.Java (which it is the current version at this time) and 2/3 months
latter Clinton introduced the version 2 of iBATIS.Java :-!.
Since this time, the .NET version have been refactoring in a transparent way
to introduce the fonctionnalities of iBATIS.Java V2 and we continue.
DataAccess 1.6.1 GA == mixed of Java DAO V1 and V2
.NET DataMapper 1.2.1 GA == Java Data Mapper V2 without all the
fonctionnalities
On 7/20/05, Nathan Maves <Na...@sun.com> wrote:
>
> Do they follow the same road map?
>
> Are the following statements true?
>
> .NET DataMapper 1.2.1 == Java Data Mapper
> DataAccess 1.6.1 Beta! == Java DAO
>
> If so why not use a standard naming convention?
>
> Wow I am really on a rant today :)
>
> Nathan
> On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:49 PM, Larry Meadors wrote:
>
> > On 7/20/05, Nathan Maves <Na...@sun.com> wrote:
> >
> >> How is the team managing these two projects?
> >>
> >
> > Pretty well. ;-) Kidding aside, their are two teams with a tiny bit of
> > overlap..I know Ron and I both use both versions.
> >
> >
> >> Do they use the same code base?
> >>
> >
> > Nope, they are totally independent.
> >
> >
> >> Can we expect the same functionality from both?
> >>
> >
> > Not identical, but *very* similar.
> >
> > Larry
> >
>
>
Mapping SP to Beans in oracle
Posted by Wilberto Montoya <wi...@ec-red.com>.
Hi i have two questions about Oracle (yes, i know i'm not the only ;) ), but
is posible map an oracle cursor to a class like a java bean only changing
the XML file (without typehandler) and is posible map more than one cursor?
thank you
<parameterMap id="clientParameters" class="map" >
> <parameter property="result" jdbcType="ORACLECURSOR" mode="OUT"/>
> <parameter property="maxRows" jdbcType="VARCHAR"
javaType="java.lang.String" mode="IN"/>
> </parameterMap>
> <procedure id="getClientListProc" resultMap="clientResult"
parameterMap="clientParameters">
> {?= call abc.CLIENT_VIEW_PKG.client_result_list_f(?)}
> </procedure>
Re: .Net vs Java
Posted by Nathan Maves <Na...@Sun.COM>.
Do they follow the same road map?
Are the following statements true?
.NET DataMapper 1.2.1 == Java Data Mapper
DataAccess 1.6.1 Beta! == Java DAO
If so why not use a standard naming convention?
Wow I am really on a rant today :)
Nathan
On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:49 PM, Larry Meadors wrote:
> On 7/20/05, Nathan Maves <Na...@sun.com> wrote:
>
>> How is the team managing these two projects?
>>
>
> Pretty well. ;-) Kidding aside, their are two teams with a tiny bit of
> overlap..I know Ron and I both use both versions.
>
>
>> Do they use the same code base?
>>
>
> Nope, they are totally independent.
>
>
>> Can we expect the same functionality from both?
>>
>
> Not identical, but *very* similar.
>
> Larry
>
Re: .Net vs Java
Posted by Larry Meadors <la...@gmail.com>.
On 7/20/05, Nathan Maves <Na...@sun.com> wrote:
> How is the team managing these two projects?
Pretty well. ;-) Kidding aside, their are two teams with a tiny bit of
overlap..I know Ron and I both use both versions.
> Do they use the same code base?
Nope, they are totally independent.
> Can we expect the same functionality from both?
Not identical, but *very* similar.
Larry