You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Emmanuel Bourg <sm...@lfjr.net> on 2004/07/05 12:05:52 UTC
[configuration] ConfigurationFactory
Is there a need to keep the inner classes AdditionalConfigurationData
and ConfigurationBuilder in ConfigurationFactory static ? I also wonder
if it is desirable to have the other inner classes public, I would make
them private or package visible.
Emmanuel Bourg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [configuration] ConfigurationFactory
Posted by Oliver Heger <he...@med.uni-marburg.de>.
There is no special need that these classes are static. I prefer to make
inner classes static if they do not need a reference to their outer
class and are merely utility classes.
The public inner classes will be called and instantiated by Digester
when the XML file is parsed. I think this forces at least some of them
being public.
Oliver
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Is there a need to keep the inner classes AdditionalConfigurationData
> and ConfigurationBuilder in ConfigurationFactory static ? I also wonder
> if it is desirable to have the other inner classes public, I would make
> them private or package visible.
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org