You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Dirk Verbeeck <di...@pandora.be> on 2004/06/09 07:53:37 UTC
Re: Commons DBCP and Pool 1.2
That's correct, there were no code changes between RC1 and 1.2 final.
-- Dirk
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Dirk,
>
> Can you please confirm that there were *no* changes to DBCP or Pool since
> the RC1 jars I had picked up for James? We're releasing this week.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: Commons DBCP and Pool 1.2
Posted by Dirk Verbeeck <di...@pandora.be>.
Noel,
An immediate release of DBCP 1.2.1 based on CVS head sounds OK.
Otherwise we'll get more of those incompatibility bug reports.
I will see what I can do this weekend.
-- Dirk
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Dirk,
>
> Do we need to immediately issue a DBCP and Pool 1.2.1 with the 1.4
> dependencies removed? James has 1.3 as an operational platform, and we have
> quite a few users who are not on 1.4.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
RE: Commons DBCP and Pool 1.2
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
Dirk,
Do we need to immediately issue a DBCP and Pool 1.2.1 with the 1.4
dependencies removed? James has 1.3 as an operational platform, and we have
quite a few users who are not on 1.4.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org