You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@curator.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/10/02 22:23:34 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-144) TreeCache should use a builder for
advanced options
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14157121#comment-14157121 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CURATOR-144:
----------------------------------------
Github user dragonsinth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/41#discussion_r18364761
--- Diff: curator-recipes/src/main/java/org/apache/curator/framework/recipes/cache/TreeCache.java ---
@@ -65,6 +70,102 @@
{
private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(TreeCache.class);
+ public static final class Builder
--- End diff --
That's kind of weird since it's then TreeCache.TreeCacheBuilder instead of just TreeCache.Builder. I see "Builder" as a static inner class much more often, for example in Guava (ImmutableList.Builder) and protoc-generated java code.
> TreeCache should use a builder for advanced options
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CURATOR-144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-144
> Project: Apache Curator
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Recipes
> Reporter: Scott Blum
> Priority: Minor
> Original Estimate: 24h
> Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)