[RESULT][VOTE] Third release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC2) is available.

[Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>]

With 4 binding +1 votes and no -0's, the vote has passed. I'll publish the
release artifacts shortly. Thanks everyone for helping with the release!

-n

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:

> Here is my +1.
>
> checked sigs, crcs
>
> build src tarsal with hadoop 2.3, 2.4.0, 2.5.0, 2.5.1, 2.5.2 and 2.6.0 and
> 2.7.0 (Did not try the 2.2)
>
> run local mode
>
> simple tests from shell
>
> Build with downstreamer
>
> checked dir layouts
>
> checked jar files
>
> checked version, tag,
>
> Checked the documentation.
>
>
> I did not these tests on the RC2, but RC0:
>
> Run with LTT with 1M load on local mode and 5 node cluster. Seems fine.
>
> Run with different block encoding and compression algorithms
>
> Run 1.0.1 and 0.98.12 clients against 1.1.0 server, some smoke tests (list,
> scan) and LTT
> I am relying on the fact that RC0 and RC2 has only trivial changes in
> regards to code.
>
> Enis
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > - Checked signatures
> > - Ran unit test suite
> > - Exercised basic shell commands
> > - Performed RAT check
> > - Ran LTT in a mixed deployment (0.98.4 servers along side 1.1.0 servers)
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > - Checked sums and signatures
> > > - Unpacked src tarball, layout looks good
> > > - Built from source with defaults
> > > - RAT check passed
> > > - Built from source with Hadoop 2.2.0
> > > - Unit test suite mostly passed. (See HBASE-13676.)*
> > > - Unpacked bin tarball, layout looks good
> > > - Spot checked docs, looks good*
> > > - Ran LTT with 1M keys, latencies stable after warmup. Some minor
> issues
> > > with log levels (HBASE-13673, HBASE-13674, HBASE-13675)*
> > >
> > > ​* - Carried over from previous RC​
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Testing done with the new bits:
> > > >
> > > > - confirmed there's no difference between HBASE-13661 on branch-1.1
> > > > (07d9904) HBASE-13661 on branch-1.1.0 (e860c66).
> > > >
> > > > $ interdiff <(git show 07d9904) <(git show e860c66) 2>&1 | wc -l
> > > >        0
> > > >
> > > > - inspected compatibility reports vs. 0.98.0 [0] and 1.0.0 [1].
> HTable
> > > > issue from RC1 corrected.
> > > > - extracted src tgz, structure looks good.
> > > > - verified build of src tgz against hadoop versions
> > (2.2.0/minikdc=2.3.0,
> > > > 2.3.0, 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.5.0, 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.6.0, 2.7.0), with both
> > > > jdk1.7.0_67.jdk (mac) and jdk1.8.0_20.jdk (mac).
> > > > - run LoadTestTool against standalone built from src tgz with
> FAST_DIFF
> > > > block encoder and ROWCOL blooms. No issues, filed HBASE-13677.
> > > > - built site from src tgz. site and book looks good.
> > > > - extracted bin tgz, inspect structure. looks good.
> > > > - run LoadTestTool against standalone from bin tgz with FAST_DIFF
> block
> > > > encoder and ROWCOL blooms. No issues, logs look good.
> > > > - load the site from bin tgz. looks good.
> > > > - ran Stack's hbase-downstreamer vs. the maven repo. tests pass.
> > > >
> > > > These validations combined with my previous testing means I'm +1 for
> > this
> > > > RC.
> > > >
> > > > [0]:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/0.98.0_1.1.0RC2_compat_report.html
> > > > [1]:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.0.0_1.1.0RC2_compat_report.html
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm happy to announce the third (time's the charm) release
> candidate
> > of
> > > > > HBase 1.1.0 (HBase-1.1.0RC2) is available for download at
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.0RC2/
> > > > >
> > > > > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1078
> > > > >
> > > > > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey
> 0xAD9039071C3489BD,
> > > > > available in the Apache keys directory
> > > > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc.
> > > > >
> > > > > There's also a signed tag for this release at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=831f98dc3ba722be44792d10b67c2e57d9522caf
> > > > >
> > > > > HBase 1.1.0 is the first minor release in the HBase 1.x line,
> > > continuing
> > > > > on the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop
> > and
> > > > > NoSQL communities. This release includes nearly 200 resolved issues
> > > above
> > > > > the 1.0.x series to date. Notable features include:
> > > > >
> > > > >  - Async RPC client (HBASE-12684)
> > > > >  - Simple RPC throttling (HBASE-11598)
> > > > >  - Improved compaction controls (HBASE-8329, HBASE-12859)
> > > > >  - Scan improvements (HBASE-11544, HBASE-13090)
> > > > >  - New extension interfaces for coprocessor users, better
> supporting
> > > > > projects like Phoenix (HBASE-12972, HBASE-12975)
> > > > >  - Per-column family flush (HBASE-10201)
> > > > >  - WAL on SSD (HBASE-12848)
> > > > >  - BlockCache in Memcached (HBASE-13170)
> > > > >  - Tons of region replica enhancements around META, WAL, and bulk
> > > loading
> > > > > (HBASE-11574, HBASE-11568, HBASE-11571, HBASE-11567)
> > > > >
> > > > > The full list of issues can be found at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12329043
> > > > >
> > > > > This release candidate is not materially different from the
> previous,
> > > > > correcting the application of HBASE-13661. Because of the small
> > > > difference
> > > > > between this RC and the previous, and the extended period for which
> > the
> > > > > first RC was available, this vote window will be a continuation of
> > the
> > > > > previous window.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:00 Pacific time
> on
> > > > > 2015-05-13 as to whether we should release these bits as HBase
> 1.1.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Nick
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>