You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Dmitry Goldenberg <dg...@gmail.com> on 2016/05/16 00:45:38 UTC
The state of 2.1
Hi,
Could someone summarize the state of the VOTE for 2.1?
Thank you.
Re: The state of 2.1
Posted by Josh Elser <el...@apache.org>.
Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I assume you mean Commons VFS 2.1.
>
> The second release candidate was effectively pulled because we were
> missing a LICENSE/NOTICE entry:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/Zif1iomxs7u25tt
>
> This should be trivial to fix, but also important to get right legally.
>
>
> I assume Josh Elser (as the Release Manager for this candidate) will
> formally mark the 2.1 RC2 thread as [CANCELLED] and then we can
> prepare a new RC3 for voting.
>
> ..but be aware that many Apache committers have been involved with
> ApacheCon which just finished last Friday, so folks probably have lots
> of things to catch up on.
>
> On 16 May 2016 at 01:45, Dmitry Goldenberg<dg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could someone summarize the state of the VOTE for 2.1?
>>
>> Thank you.
>
Yeah, had a busy end of week and weekend, so I didn't have any time to
sit down in front of a computer and hash this all out. I pinged busbey
(the original reporter of the issue) to make sure he has visibility of
the assessment of the situation. Your legwork has been great and makes
sense to me, Stian.
Hopefully we can proceed with RC2, but it would be pretty easy to add
that new line to NOTICE and roll an RC3 if necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: The state of 2.1
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 16 May 2016 at 08:33, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I assume you mean Commons VFS 2.1.
>
> The second release candidate was effectively pulled because we were
> missing a LICENSE/NOTICE entry:
Surely it has not yet been established whether an entry is needed or not?
Therefore the VOTE can remain open whilst this is determined.
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/Zif1iomxs7u25tt
>
> This should be trivial to fix, but also important to get right legally.
Maybe no fix is needed.
See else-thread.
>
> I assume Josh Elser (as the Release Manager for this candidate) will
> formally mark the 2.1 RC2 thread as [CANCELLED] and then we can
> prepare a new RC3 for voting.
Again, perhaps not necessary.
> ..but be aware that many Apache committers have been involved with
> ApacheCon which just finished last Friday, so folks probably have lots
> of things to catch up on.
>
> On 16 May 2016 at 01:45, Dmitry Goldenberg <dg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could someone summarize the state of the VOTE for 2.1?
>>
>> Thank you.
>
>
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: The state of 2.1
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I assume you mean Commons VFS 2.1.
The second release candidate was effectively pulled because we were
missing a LICENSE/NOTICE entry:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/Zif1iomxs7u25tt
This should be trivial to fix, but also important to get right legally.
I assume Josh Elser (as the Release Manager for this candidate) will
formally mark the 2.1 RC2 thread as [CANCELLED] and then we can
prepare a new RC3 for voting.
..but be aware that many Apache committers have been involved with
ApacheCon which just finished last Friday, so folks probably have lots
of things to catch up on.
On 16 May 2016 at 01:45, Dmitry Goldenberg <dg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone summarize the state of the VOTE for 2.1?
>
> Thank you.
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org