You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net> on 2006/03/20 20:14:19 UTC
Re: svn commit: r18966 - branches/fs-atomic-renames/subversion/tests/libsvn_fs
rooneg@tigris.org wrote:
> Author: rooneg
> Date: Mon Mar 20 12:07:49 2006
> New Revision: 18966
[...]
> Modified: branches/fs-atomic-renames/subversion/tests/libsvn_fs/fs-test.c
> URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/branches/fs-atomic-renames/subversion/tests/libsvn_fs/fs-test.c?pathrev=18966&r1=18965&r2=18966
> ==============================================================================
> --- branches/fs-atomic-renames/subversion/tests/libsvn_fs/fs-test.c (original)
> +++ branches/fs-atomic-renames/subversion/tests/libsvn_fs/fs-test.c Mon Mar 20 12:07:49 2006
> @@ -4625,7 +4625,6 @@
> svn_fs_txn_t *txn;
> svn_fs_root_t *txn_root, *rev_root;
> svn_revnum_t after_rev;
> - svn_fs_history_t *history;
I'm so -1 on this change. Subversion has strived since the day it first
drew breath to maintain, at all costs, history[1].
-- C-Mike
[1] There was that brief sussman-induced period in which the software
could have more aptly been named OneVersion, but that's long been
forgiven.
--
C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Distractions Undemanded
Re: svn commit: r18966 - branches/fs-atomic-renames/subversion/tests/libsvn_fs
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On 3/20/06, C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net> wrote:
> I'm so -1 on this change. Subversion has strived since the day it first
> drew breath to maintain, at all costs, history[1].
I'm sorry, but I still contend that the decision to preserve history
in our version control system was a mistake. It must be eradicated at
all costs!
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org