You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to pluto-dev@portals.apache.org by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org> on 2007/03/31 18:47:33 UTC
Pluto 1.1.3 Release
Are all of the notice files in place now for the build? Should we move
forward with 1.1.3 this weekend?
David
Re: Pluto 1.1.3 Release
Posted by Charles Severance <cs...@umich.edu>.
DOH - Found it.
/Chuck
On Mar 31, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Charles Severance wrote:
> Eliott - I am a dummy - what is the URL for the jar artifacts?
>
> /Chuck
>
> On Mar 31, 2007, at 4:20 PM, Elliot Metsger wrote:
>
>> Ok, I think we're good - the bits are up.
>>
>> I had to fumble with the GPG plugin and the Release plugin. I
>> updated the Wiki page with an updated release:perform command.
>>
>>
>> Elliot
>>
>
Re: Pluto 1.1.3 Release
Posted by Charles Severance <cs...@umich.edu>.
Eliott - I am a dummy - what is the URL for the jar artifacts?
/Chuck
On Mar 31, 2007, at 4:20 PM, Elliot Metsger wrote:
> Ok, I think we're good - the bits are up.
>
> I had to fumble with the GPG plugin and the Release plugin. I
> updated the Wiki page with an updated release:perform command.
>
>
> Elliot
>
Re: Pluto 1.1.3 Release
Posted by Elliot Metsger <em...@jhu.edu>.
Ok, I think we're good - the bits are up.
I had to fumble with the GPG plugin and the Release plugin. I updated
the Wiki page with an updated release:perform command.
Elliot
Elliot Metsger wrote:
> Sounds good, I'll send out an update this afternoon.
>
> E
>
> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>> Nice. . .go ahead with it if you want. I'll have cycles tonight to
>> help clean things up if you need.
>>
>> David
>>
>> Elliot Metsger wrote:
>>> Yes, the notice files are in place for 1.1.3 (I opened a separate
>>> issue for 1.2.0/trunk on this).
>>>
>>> Moving forward with 1.1.3 sounds good to me. I have cycles this
>>> afternoon, and some on Sunday afternoon.
>>>
>>> E
>>>
>>> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>>>> Are all of the notice files in place now for the build? Should we
>>>> move forward with 1.1.3 this weekend?
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>
>
Re: Pluto 1.1.3 Release
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
Not a ton, but a little bit. The biggest thing is that urls generated
by the portal are no longer absolute (http://...), but instead are
relative to the server root (/<context-path>/...) - but this is a portal
driver thing and not a container thing
See:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12312391&styleName=Text&projectId=10560&Create=Create
More than anything the biggest thing is adding release notes to the mvn
artifacts so we could public ally announce the release (we refrained
from doing so for 1.1.2).
QA would still be helpful to make sure we don't have regressions.
Charles Severance wrote:
> Is there new functionality here? I can do a quick QA of release files
> if needed later tonight.
>
> /Chuck
>
> On Mar 31, 2007, at 1:50 PM, Elliot Metsger wrote:
>
>> Sounds good, I'll send out an update this afternoon.
>>
>> E
>>
>> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>>> Nice. . .go ahead with it if you want. I'll have cycles tonight to
>>> help clean things up if you need.
>>> David
>>> Elliot Metsger wrote:
>>>> Yes, the notice files are in place for 1.1.3 (I opened a separate
>>>> issue for 1.2.0/trunk on this).
>>>>
>>>> Moving forward with 1.1.3 sounds good to me. I have cycles this
>>>> afternoon, and some on Sunday afternoon.
>>>>
>>>> E
>>>>
>>>> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>>>>> Are all of the notice files in place now for the build? Should we
>>>>> move forward with 1.1.3 this weekend?
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Pluto 1.1.3 Release
Posted by Charles Severance <cs...@umich.edu>.
Is there new functionality here? I can do a quick QA of release
files if needed later tonight.
/Chuck
On Mar 31, 2007, at 1:50 PM, Elliot Metsger wrote:
> Sounds good, I'll send out an update this afternoon.
>
> E
>
> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>> Nice. . .go ahead with it if you want. I'll have cycles tonight
>> to help clean things up if you need.
>> David
>> Elliot Metsger wrote:
>>> Yes, the notice files are in place for 1.1.3 (I opened a separate
>>> issue for 1.2.0/trunk on this).
>>>
>>> Moving forward with 1.1.3 sounds good to me. I have cycles this
>>> afternoon, and some on Sunday afternoon.
>>>
>>> E
>>>
>>> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>>>> Are all of the notice files in place now for the build? Should
>>>> we move forward with 1.1.3 this weekend?
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>
>
>
Re: Pluto 1.1.3 Release
Posted by Elliot Metsger <em...@jhu.edu>.
Sounds good, I'll send out an update this afternoon.
E
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> Nice. . .go ahead with it if you want. I'll have cycles tonight to help
> clean things up if you need.
>
> David
>
> Elliot Metsger wrote:
>> Yes, the notice files are in place for 1.1.3 (I opened a separate
>> issue for 1.2.0/trunk on this).
>>
>> Moving forward with 1.1.3 sounds good to me. I have cycles this
>> afternoon, and some on Sunday afternoon.
>>
>> E
>>
>> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>>> Are all of the notice files in place now for the build? Should we
>>> move forward with 1.1.3 this weekend?
>>>
>>> David
>>
Re: Pluto 1.1.3 Release
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
Nice. . .go ahead with it if you want. I'll have cycles tonight to help
clean things up if you need.
David
Elliot Metsger wrote:
> Yes, the notice files are in place for 1.1.3 (I opened a separate issue
> for 1.2.0/trunk on this).
>
> Moving forward with 1.1.3 sounds good to me. I have cycles this
> afternoon, and some on Sunday afternoon.
>
> E
>
> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>> Are all of the notice files in place now for the build? Should we
>> move forward with 1.1.3 this weekend?
>>
>> David
>
Re: Pluto 1.1.3 Release
Posted by Elliot Metsger <em...@jhu.edu>.
Yes, the notice files are in place for 1.1.3 (I opened a separate issue
for 1.2.0/trunk on this).
Moving forward with 1.1.3 sounds good to me. I have cycles this
afternoon, and some on Sunday afternoon.
E
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> Are all of the notice files in place now for the build? Should we move
> forward with 1.1.3 this weekend?
>
> David